Work and illness risks in Territorial Psychosocial Care: implications for mental health care management

Israel Coutinho Sampaio Lima, José Jackson Coelho Sampaio, Antonio Rodrigues Ferreira Júnior
{"title":"Work and illness risks in Territorial Psychosocial Care: implications for mental health care management","authors":"Israel Coutinho Sampaio Lima, José Jackson Coelho Sampaio, Antonio Rodrigues Ferreira Júnior","doi":"10.1590/0103-1104202313911i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study aims to analyze precarious work due to working conditions that influence the management of mental health care and occupational health. This single case mixed study was conducted in six Psychosocial Care Centers (CAPS) in a Decentralized Health Sector. The Work and Illness Risks Inventory was applied to a total purposeful sample of 35 workers, 15 of whom participated in the projective interview. Data were processed in SPSS 26.0.0.0 as measures of central tendency and dispersion. The interviews were categorized based on the evaluation axes proposed by the inventory, contextualized, and discussed from Edgar Morin’s Complex Thought. The result is critical for most predictors that evaluated the context, human cost, pleasure, distress, and harm related to work in the CAPS. Data illustrated by the workers’ narratives describe the precarious work conditions. Local Unified Health System managers quickly incorporated neoliberalism’s productivist principles, perpetuating substandard work conditions. Mental health care management processes, funding, and legal occupational and contractual conditions must be reviewed to align with Territorial Psychosocial Care (APT).","PeriodicalId":267215,"journal":{"name":"Saúde em Debate","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saúde em Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202313911i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study aims to analyze precarious work due to working conditions that influence the management of mental health care and occupational health. This single case mixed study was conducted in six Psychosocial Care Centers (CAPS) in a Decentralized Health Sector. The Work and Illness Risks Inventory was applied to a total purposeful sample of 35 workers, 15 of whom participated in the projective interview. Data were processed in SPSS 26.0.0.0 as measures of central tendency and dispersion. The interviews were categorized based on the evaluation axes proposed by the inventory, contextualized, and discussed from Edgar Morin’s Complex Thought. The result is critical for most predictors that evaluated the context, human cost, pleasure, distress, and harm related to work in the CAPS. Data illustrated by the workers’ narratives describe the precarious work conditions. Local Unified Health System managers quickly incorporated neoliberalism’s productivist principles, perpetuating substandard work conditions. Mental health care management processes, funding, and legal occupational and contractual conditions must be reviewed to align with Territorial Psychosocial Care (APT).
全境社会心理护理中的工作和疾病风险:对心理保健管理的影响
摘要 本研究旨在分析影响心理保健和职业健康管理的工作条件所导致的不稳定工作。这项单一案例混合研究是在一个权力下放的卫生部门的六个社会心理护理中心(CAPS)进行的。工作与疾病风险量表适用于 35 名工人的有目的样本,其中 15 人参加了投射式访谈。数据在 SPSS 26.0.0 中进行了集中趋势和离散度测量。根据清单提出的评价轴对访谈进行了分类,并根据埃德加-莫林的复杂思想对访谈进行了语境化和讨论。在 CAPS 中,对与工作相关的情境、人力成本、快乐、痛苦和伤害进行评估的大多数预测指标的结果都是至关重要的。工人的叙述数据描述了不稳定的工作条件。当地联合医疗系统的管理者很快就采纳了新自由主义的生产原则,使不达标的工作条件长期存在。必须对心理保健管理程序、资金、法定职业和合同条件进行审查,以便与地区社会心理保健(APT)保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信