{"title":"How Oil and Gas Companies can derive C-Factors in the API RP 14E Erosional Velocity Models for their ‘Clean Service’ Pipelines","authors":"Livinus A","doi":"10.23880/ppej-16000364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In designing pipeline facilities for production and transportation of oil, hydrocarbon gases or non-hydrocarbon gases – CO2 and H2 , consideration is given to pipeline integrity, flow assurance, operation and health/safety issues. Erosion-corrosion of the inner pipeline wall and/or high-pressure losses is of great concern. For many years now, many oil and gas field operators have adopted the America Petroleum Institute recommended practice 14E (API RP 14E) equation to estimate the erosional velocity. Unfortunately, the C-factor (which is an empirical constant) in the API RP 14E equation has been generalized to all field conditions. In addition, there is no concrete scientific evidence behind the basis of its formulation, and various values have been adopted based on field and laboratory experiences. In this work, we present how oil and gas companies could formulate safer erosional velocity models for their sand free or ‘clean service’ pipelines, based on the velocities calculated for the equilibrium flow rate (that is, the intersection of vertical lift performance (VLP) and inflow performance relationship (IPR)). The developed erosional velocity models can be applied, and compared with in-house correlations, for erosional velocity predictions","PeriodicalId":282073,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In designing pipeline facilities for production and transportation of oil, hydrocarbon gases or non-hydrocarbon gases – CO2 and H2 , consideration is given to pipeline integrity, flow assurance, operation and health/safety issues. Erosion-corrosion of the inner pipeline wall and/or high-pressure losses is of great concern. For many years now, many oil and gas field operators have adopted the America Petroleum Institute recommended practice 14E (API RP 14E) equation to estimate the erosional velocity. Unfortunately, the C-factor (which is an empirical constant) in the API RP 14E equation has been generalized to all field conditions. In addition, there is no concrete scientific evidence behind the basis of its formulation, and various values have been adopted based on field and laboratory experiences. In this work, we present how oil and gas companies could formulate safer erosional velocity models for their sand free or ‘clean service’ pipelines, based on the velocities calculated for the equilibrium flow rate (that is, the intersection of vertical lift performance (VLP) and inflow performance relationship (IPR)). The developed erosional velocity models can be applied, and compared with in-house correlations, for erosional velocity predictions
石油和天然气公司如何在 API RP 14E 侵蚀速度模型中为其 "清洁服务 "管道推导出 C 因子
在设计用于生产和运输石油、碳氢化合物气体或非碳氢化合物气体(二氧化碳和 H2)的管道设施时,需要考虑管道的完整性、流量保证、运行和健康/安全问题。管道内壁的腐蚀和/或高压损失是一个非常值得关注的问题。多年来,许多油气田运营商都采用美国石油学会推荐实践 14E (API RP 14E)方程来估算侵蚀速度。遗憾的是,API RP 14E 公式中的 C 因子(这是一个经验常数)已被普遍应用于所有油田条件。此外,其计算公式背后并没有具体的科学依据,人们根据现场和实验室经验采用了不同的数值。在这项工作中,我们介绍了油气公司如何根据平衡流速(即垂直提升性能(VLP)和流入性能关系(IPR)的交叉点)计算出的速度,为其无砂或 "清洁服务 "管道制定更安全的侵蚀速度模型。开发的侵蚀速度模型可用于侵蚀速度预测,并与内部相关数据进行比较