Repair Project Acceleration Strategy of Three Ship Units using Fuzzy Logic Analysis and Critical Path Method

Hidayatus Ubyani, T. Tuswan, H. Yudo, Haris Nubli, O. Mursid, Muhammad Iqbal
{"title":"Repair Project Acceleration Strategy of Three Ship Units using Fuzzy Logic Analysis and Critical Path Method","authors":"Hidayatus Ubyani, T. Tuswan, H. Yudo, Haris Nubli, O. Mursid, Muhammad Iqbal","doi":"10.20961/mekanika.v22i2.76502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The project planning process, especially in ship repair projects, is essential to improving project completion. Ineffective planning of ship repair projects results in a lack of time and labour efficiency. Therefore, using project acceleration tools in scheduling ship repair activities is crucial to accelerate project completion and mitigate risk analysis of delays for each project activity. This research uses the critical path method (CPM) to analyze the main schedule of three combined ship repair projects. Then, shop-level planning is used to determine the productivity of each workshop so that each workshop knows the volume of work that needs to be completed daily. Furthermore, fuzzy logic is applied to analyze the risk of delays in repair project activities. The addition of working hours to critical work activities is accelerated from 30 days, the normal duration, to 23 days. Meanwhile, the addition of the workforce to critical work activities is accelerated from 30 days, the normal duration, to 22 days. The analysis of productivity values in each workshop results in the following productivity values: sandblasting and painting workshop 309.97 m2/person-days, piping workshop 4.12 units/person-days, fabrication workshop 407.16 kg/person-days, outfitting workshop 14.8 units/person-days, tank cleaning workshop 114.36 m3/person-days, and machining workshop 2.7 units/person-days. The fuzzy logic analysis results to determine the risk of delays in critical activities show that jobs with the codes SP1, SP2, SP3, SP4, M2, and SP5 have a high risk of delay. Additionally, the collaboration with other departments in the company, such as the marketing, finance, and human resources departments, is ongoing to complete assigned tasks.","PeriodicalId":356258,"journal":{"name":"Mekanika: Majalah Ilmiah Mekanika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mekanika: Majalah Ilmiah Mekanika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/mekanika.v22i2.76502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The project planning process, especially in ship repair projects, is essential to improving project completion. Ineffective planning of ship repair projects results in a lack of time and labour efficiency. Therefore, using project acceleration tools in scheduling ship repair activities is crucial to accelerate project completion and mitigate risk analysis of delays for each project activity. This research uses the critical path method (CPM) to analyze the main schedule of three combined ship repair projects. Then, shop-level planning is used to determine the productivity of each workshop so that each workshop knows the volume of work that needs to be completed daily. Furthermore, fuzzy logic is applied to analyze the risk of delays in repair project activities. The addition of working hours to critical work activities is accelerated from 30 days, the normal duration, to 23 days. Meanwhile, the addition of the workforce to critical work activities is accelerated from 30 days, the normal duration, to 22 days. The analysis of productivity values in each workshop results in the following productivity values: sandblasting and painting workshop 309.97 m2/person-days, piping workshop 4.12 units/person-days, fabrication workshop 407.16 kg/person-days, outfitting workshop 14.8 units/person-days, tank cleaning workshop 114.36 m3/person-days, and machining workshop 2.7 units/person-days. The fuzzy logic analysis results to determine the risk of delays in critical activities show that jobs with the codes SP1, SP2, SP3, SP4, M2, and SP5 have a high risk of delay. Additionally, the collaboration with other departments in the company, such as the marketing, finance, and human resources departments, is ongoing to complete assigned tasks.
使用模糊逻辑分析法和关键路径法的三船单位修理项目加速策略
项目规划过程,尤其是修船项目的规划过程,对于提高项目完成率至关重要。修船项目规划不力会导致时间和劳动效率低下。因此,在安排修船活动时使用项目加速工具,对于加快项目完工速度和减轻每个项目活动的延误风险分析至关重要。本研究采用关键路径法(CPM)分析了三个联合修船项目的主要进度计划。然后,使用车间级计划来确定每个车间的生产率,以便每个车间了解每天需要完成的工作量。此外,还采用模糊逻辑分析修理项目活动的延误风险。关键工作活动的工时增加从正常的 30 天加快到 23 天。同时,关键工作活动的劳动力增加时间也从正常情况下的 30 天加快到 22 天。对各车间生产率值的分析结果如下:喷砂和喷漆车间 309.97 平方米/人-天,管道车间 4.12 台/人-天,制造车间 407.16 公斤/人-天,舾装车间 14.8 台/人-天,储罐清洗车间 114.36 立方米/人-天,机加工车间 2.7 台/人-天。确定关键活动延误风险的模糊逻辑分析结果显示,代码为 SP1、SP2、SP3、SP4、M2 和 SP5 的工作具有较高的延误风险。此外,与公司其他部门(如市场部、财务部和人力资源部)的合作也在持续进行,以完成分配的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信