Antifungal activity of Punica granatum linn extracts against Malassezia pachydermatis

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sophia Aparecida Morro Chamilete, L. S. Matsumoto, Fernanda Delfino, Guilherme Villa Pirajá, R. M. G. Silva, E. C. T. M. Peixoto
{"title":"Antifungal activity of Punica granatum linn extracts against Malassezia pachydermatis","authors":"Sophia Aparecida Morro Chamilete, L. S. Matsumoto, Fernanda Delfino, Guilherme Villa Pirajá, R. M. G. Silva, E. C. T. M. Peixoto","doi":"10.14393/bj-v39n0a2023-66031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malassezia pachydermatis causes external otitis, often affecting dogs, and control methods for this microorganism have been resistant to synthetic antifungals. Therefore, this study evaluated the antifungal activity of aqueous extracts of Punica granatum Linn (AEP) fruit peel dehydrated (AEPd) and in natura (AEPn) against Malassezia pachydermatis. The M. pachydermatis samples were from the Microbiology Laboratory of the State University of Northern Paraná (UENP), PR, Brazil. The strains were identified and replicated after inoculation in the Sabouraud dextrose medium. Subsequently, the P. granatum extract was obtained through different extraction methods: cold, water bath, decoction, and infusion. Each test was run fivefold at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% after 10, 20, and 30 minutes. The sensitivity of isolates was determined with the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and indicated by an inhibition zone larger than 15 mm. The results were evaluated with a 2x3x6 factorial study design, ANOVA, and Tukey's test at 5% significance. AEPn showed antifungal activity on M. pachydermatis strains, and AEPd did not present an inhibitory influence at any concentration and time.  Extraction by decoction was the most efficient, followed by water bath, cold, and infusion. The extracts at a 50% concentration showed the best results, but all other doses determined an inhibition zone larger than 15 mm. Thus, AEP showed a significant therapeutic potential for controlling M. pachydermatis.","PeriodicalId":8951,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14393/bj-v39n0a2023-66031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malassezia pachydermatis causes external otitis, often affecting dogs, and control methods for this microorganism have been resistant to synthetic antifungals. Therefore, this study evaluated the antifungal activity of aqueous extracts of Punica granatum Linn (AEP) fruit peel dehydrated (AEPd) and in natura (AEPn) against Malassezia pachydermatis. The M. pachydermatis samples were from the Microbiology Laboratory of the State University of Northern Paraná (UENP), PR, Brazil. The strains were identified and replicated after inoculation in the Sabouraud dextrose medium. Subsequently, the P. granatum extract was obtained through different extraction methods: cold, water bath, decoction, and infusion. Each test was run fivefold at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% after 10, 20, and 30 minutes. The sensitivity of isolates was determined with the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and indicated by an inhibition zone larger than 15 mm. The results were evaluated with a 2x3x6 factorial study design, ANOVA, and Tukey's test at 5% significance. AEPn showed antifungal activity on M. pachydermatis strains, and AEPd did not present an inhibitory influence at any concentration and time.  Extraction by decoction was the most efficient, followed by water bath, cold, and infusion. The extracts at a 50% concentration showed the best results, but all other doses determined an inhibition zone larger than 15 mm. Thus, AEP showed a significant therapeutic potential for controlling M. pachydermatis.
丹皮提取物对马拉色菌的抗真菌活性
马拉色菌(Malassezia pachydermatis)会引起外耳道炎,通常会影响到狗,而控制这种微生物的方法对合成抗真菌药物有抗药性。因此,本研究评估了去水(AEPd)和天然(AEPn)石榴皮水提取物对马拉色菌的抗真菌活性。马拉色菌样本来自巴西北巴拉那州立大学(UENP)的微生物实验室。菌株在沙保酵母葡萄糖培养基中接种后进行了鉴定和复制。随后,通过不同的提取方法(冷提取、水浴提取、煎煮提取和浸泡提取)获得了 P. granatum 提取物。每种试验在 10、20、30、40 和 50% 时进行五次,分别在 10、20 和 30 分钟后进行。用柯比鲍尔盘扩散法测定分离物的敏感性,抑制区大于 15 毫米即为敏感性。研究结果采用 2x3x6 的因子研究设计、方差分析和 5% 的 Tukey 检验进行评估。AEPn 对柏氏真菌菌株具有抗真菌活性,而 AEPd 在任何浓度和时间下都没有抑制作用。 煎煮提取的效率最高,其次是水浴提取、冷提取和浸泡提取。浓度为 50%的提取物显示出最佳效果,但所有其他剂量确定的抑制区都大于 15 毫米。因此,AEP 在控制矛孢子菌方面具有显著的治疗潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioscience Journal
Bioscience Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bioscience Journal is an interdisciplinary electronic journal that publishes scientific articles in the areas of Agricultural Sciences, Biological Sciences and Health Sciences. Its mission is to disseminate new knowledge while contributing to the development of science in the country and in the world. The journal is published in a continuous flow, in English. The opinions and concepts expressed in the published articles are the sole responsibility of their authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信