An Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of M30 Concrete Using Seashell Powder and Eggshell Powder as a Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Comparison with Conventional Concrete

Q4 Materials Science
Pasupuleti Jaswanth, Ganesan Ramachandran
{"title":"An Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of M30 Concrete Using Seashell Powder and Eggshell Powder as a Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Comparison with Conventional Concrete","authors":"Pasupuleti Jaswanth, Ganesan Ramachandran","doi":"10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the research is to compare seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete and conventional concrete on the compressive strength. In this study, a total of 18 samples were divided into two groups and prepared for data collection. One is made with ordinary concrete, and the other with seashells and eggshells-based powder M30 concrete. To perform the independent sample t-test, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software, version 21, was used. The seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete sample has a mean compressive strength of 38.00 N/mm 2 , whereas the conventional concrete test sample has a mean characteristics compressive strength of 33.73 N/mm 2 . Independent samples t-test is performed to analyze the results. When a significant difference is found between the two groups in an independent sample t-test and the G-power is 80% and p = 0.053 (p > 0.05), the independent sample t-test is run for both groups is not statistically significant. The standard deviation is 2.90452, 5.81220, and the standard error is 0.68460, 1.36995, with the mean value being 33.7294, 36.8378. From the experimental study results, it could be found that the seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete has more compressive strength than traditional concrete.","PeriodicalId":36802,"journal":{"name":"NanoWorld Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NanoWorld Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/nwj.2023-s3-050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the research is to compare seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete and conventional concrete on the compressive strength. In this study, a total of 18 samples were divided into two groups and prepared for data collection. One is made with ordinary concrete, and the other with seashells and eggshells-based powder M30 concrete. To perform the independent sample t-test, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software, version 21, was used. The seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete sample has a mean compressive strength of 38.00 N/mm 2 , whereas the conventional concrete test sample has a mean characteristics compressive strength of 33.73 N/mm 2 . Independent samples t-test is performed to analyze the results. When a significant difference is found between the two groups in an independent sample t-test and the G-power is 80% and p = 0.053 (p > 0.05), the independent sample t-test is run for both groups is not statistically significant. The standard deviation is 2.90452, 5.81220, and the standard error is 0.68460, 1.36995, with the mean value being 33.7294, 36.8378. From the experimental study results, it could be found that the seashell and eggshell based powder M30 concrete has more compressive strength than traditional concrete.
使用贝壳粉和蛋壳粉部分替代细骨料的 M30 混凝土抗压强度与传统混凝土对比实验研究
研究的目的是比较基于贝壳和蛋壳粉的 M30 混凝土和传统混凝土的抗压强度。在这项研究中,共有 18 个样本被分为两组,并准备收集数据。一组使用普通混凝土,另一组使用贝壳和蛋壳粉 M30 混凝土。使用 21 版 SPSS(社会科学统计软件包)软件进行独立样本 t 检验。贝壳和蛋壳粉 M30 混凝土样本的平均抗压强度为 38.00 牛顿/毫米 2,而传统混凝土测试样本的平均抗压强度为 33.73 牛顿/毫米 2。对结果进行了独立样本 t 检验。当在独立样本 t 检验中发现两组之间存在显着差异,且 G 功率为 80%,p = 0.053(p > 0.05)时,对两组进行独立样本 t 检验在统计上并不显着。标准差为 2.90452、5.81220,标准误差为 0.68460、1.36995,平均值为 33.7294、36.8378。从实验研究结果可以看出,贝壳和蛋壳粉 M30 混凝土的抗压强度高于传统混凝土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NanoWorld Journal
NanoWorld Journal Materials Science-Polymers and Plastics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信