The effects of dexamethasone and erythropoietin on mice sciatic nerve crush injury: histopathologic and functional outcomes

Q4 Veterinary
Nikta Mansouri, H. Fattahian, Alireza Jahandideh, H. Akbarein
{"title":"The effects of dexamethasone and erythropoietin on mice sciatic nerve crush injury: histopathologic and functional outcomes","authors":"Nikta Mansouri, H. Fattahian, Alireza Jahandideh, H. Akbarein","doi":"10.5380/avs.v28i3.85581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peripheral neuropathies are one of the major causes of motor and sensory disability. The multitude of nerve injuries and associated comorbidities provides a strong impetus to find a drug that potentiate or accelerate axonal regeneration. Systemic drug delivery has been a promising strategy in this regard. This study aimed to evaluate dexamethasone and erythropoietin effects on sciatic nerve regeneration. Twenty-three mice were randomly assigned to sham, control, dexamethasone, erythropoietin, and dexamethasone + erythropoietin groups. The left sciatic nerve was crushed using mosquito hemostatic forceps. Medications were administered once daily for 28 days. The sham group received neither crush injury nor medication. Histopathologic and walking track analyses were performed. Medical therapy influence on functional recovery was observed in as soon as 14 days. Although functional recovery was superior in the dexamethasone + erythropoietin group, a complete return to near-normal function was seen after 28 days in all of the groups. Dexamethasone yielded superior SFI values compared to the erythropoietin on day 14, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.534). Histopathologically, recovery of average axonal number up to 75% normal nerve and significant decline of axonal swelling was observed in the erythropoietin and dexamethasone + erythropoietin groups, which were statistically significant compared to the dexamethasone group (p = 0.008). Marked immunoreactivity to Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was present in the dexamethasone group. Furthermore, immunoreactivity to S-100 protein was observed in regenerated nerves in all groups. Present data provide insights into the neurotrophic effects of dexamethasone and erythropoietin on sciatic crush; however, further investigation is required to justify the clinical application of these agents.","PeriodicalId":8351,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Veterinary Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v28i3.85581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peripheral neuropathies are one of the major causes of motor and sensory disability. The multitude of nerve injuries and associated comorbidities provides a strong impetus to find a drug that potentiate or accelerate axonal regeneration. Systemic drug delivery has been a promising strategy in this regard. This study aimed to evaluate dexamethasone and erythropoietin effects on sciatic nerve regeneration. Twenty-three mice were randomly assigned to sham, control, dexamethasone, erythropoietin, and dexamethasone + erythropoietin groups. The left sciatic nerve was crushed using mosquito hemostatic forceps. Medications were administered once daily for 28 days. The sham group received neither crush injury nor medication. Histopathologic and walking track analyses were performed. Medical therapy influence on functional recovery was observed in as soon as 14 days. Although functional recovery was superior in the dexamethasone + erythropoietin group, a complete return to near-normal function was seen after 28 days in all of the groups. Dexamethasone yielded superior SFI values compared to the erythropoietin on day 14, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.534). Histopathologically, recovery of average axonal number up to 75% normal nerve and significant decline of axonal swelling was observed in the erythropoietin and dexamethasone + erythropoietin groups, which were statistically significant compared to the dexamethasone group (p = 0.008). Marked immunoreactivity to Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was present in the dexamethasone group. Furthermore, immunoreactivity to S-100 protein was observed in regenerated nerves in all groups. Present data provide insights into the neurotrophic effects of dexamethasone and erythropoietin on sciatic crush; however, further investigation is required to justify the clinical application of these agents.
地塞米松和促红细胞生成素对小鼠坐骨神经挤压伤的影响:组织病理学和功能结果
周围神经病是造成运动和感觉残疾的主要原因之一。大量的神经损伤和相关合并症为寻找一种能促进或加速轴突再生的药物提供了强大的动力。在这方面,全身给药是一种很有前景的策略。本研究旨在评估地塞米松和促红细胞生成素对坐骨神经再生的影响。23 只小鼠被随机分配到假组、对照组、地塞米松组、促红细胞生成素组和地塞米松 + 促红细胞生成素组。用蚊式止血钳压碎左侧坐骨神经。每天用药一次,连续用药 28 天。假组既不接受挤压损伤,也不接受药物治疗。进行组织病理学和行走轨迹分析。药物治疗对功能恢复的影响在14天内就能观察到。虽然地塞米松+促红细胞生成素组的功能恢复较好,但在28天后,所有组的功能都完全恢复到接近正常水平。与促红细胞生成素相比,地塞米松在第14天的SFI值更高,但这并不具有统计学意义(p = 0.534)。从组织病理学角度看,促红细胞生成素组和地塞米松+促红细胞生成素组的轴突平均数量恢复到正常神经的75%,轴突肿胀明显减少,与地塞米松组相比有统计学意义(p = 0.008)。地塞米松组出现了明显的神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)免疫反应。此外,在所有组的再生神经中都观察到了 S-100 蛋白的免疫反应。目前的数据提供了地塞米松和促红细胞生成素对坐骨神经损伤的神经营养作用的见解;然而,要证明这些药物的临床应用是合理的,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Veterinary Science
Archives of Veterinary Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 weeks
期刊介绍: O periódico ARCHIVES OF VETERINARY SCIENCE (AVS) é publicado trimestralmente, sob orientação do seu Corpo Editorial, com a finalidade de divulgar artigos completos e de revisão relacionados à ciência animal sobre os temas: clínica, cirurgia e patologia veterinária; sanidade animal e medicina veterinária preventiva; nutrição e alimentação animal; sistemas de produção animal e meio ambiente; reprodução e melhoramento genético animal; tecnologia de alimentos; economia e sociologia rural e métodos de investigação científica. A publicação dos artigos científicos dependerá da observância das normas editoriais e dos pareceres dos consultores “ad hoc”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信