Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 25 August 2022 (III FSK 1262/21)

Barbara Smuk
{"title":"Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 25 August 2022 (III FSK 1262/21)","authors":"Barbara Smuk","doi":"10.17951/ppa.2022.5.191-201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commentary is devoted to the issue of the head of the tax office’s refusal to issue a notary public with a certificate confirming that the acquisition is exempt from tax, that the tax due has been paid or the tax liability has expired due to the statute of limitations. The aim is to show that this obligation cannot be identified with the fact that the notary public is entitled to apply for the issuance of this certificate pursuant to Article 306a of the Act of 29 August 1997 – Tax Ordinance on its own behalf and for its own benefit as the addressee of Article 19 (6) of the Act of 28 July 1983 on inheritance and donation tax in a situation where he is only to prepare a notarial deed documenting the sale of shares.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2022.5.191-201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commentary is devoted to the issue of the head of the tax office’s refusal to issue a notary public with a certificate confirming that the acquisition is exempt from tax, that the tax due has been paid or the tax liability has expired due to the statute of limitations. The aim is to show that this obligation cannot be identified with the fact that the notary public is entitled to apply for the issuance of this certificate pursuant to Article 306a of the Act of 29 August 1997 – Tax Ordinance on its own behalf and for its own benefit as the addressee of Article 19 (6) of the Act of 28 July 1983 on inheritance and donation tax in a situation where he is only to prepare a notarial deed documenting the sale of shares.
对最高行政法院 2022 年 8 月 25 日判决的评论(III FSK 1262/21)
评注主要涉及税务局局长拒绝向公证人出具证明,确认购置免税、已支付应缴税款或纳税义务已因 时效到期而失效的问题。这样做的目的是为了表明,这一义务不能与以下事实相提并论,即根据 1997 年 8 月 29 日的法律--《税收条例》第 306a 条,公证处作为 1983 年 7 月 28 日关于继承和捐赠税的法律第 19 条第(6)款的收件人,在其只负责准备一份记录股票销售的公证书的情况下,有权以其自身的名义并为其自身的利益申请出具该证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信