Engaging Presence of Constructivism Philosophy in and through Management of Christian Education: Reflective Investigation

Debi Silvia Dinata, Hurmanisa Yohana Juan Andika Manuputty, Katerina Tinopi, Rudie Institut Agama, Kristen Negeri, Palangka Raya
{"title":"Engaging Presence of Constructivism Philosophy in and through Management of Christian Education: Reflective Investigation","authors":"Debi Silvia Dinata, Hurmanisa Yohana Juan Andika Manuputty, Katerina Tinopi, Rudie Institut Agama, Kristen Negeri, Palangka Raya","doi":"10.58526/jsret.v2i4.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to stitch the participation of constructivism philosophy in the space of management, education, education management, and Christian education management. Such cross-disciplinary stitching became the locus of observation as well as a response to the presence of constructivism philosophy through critical reflection in education located in Christianity. Constructivism in this paper seeks to see knowledge not as an object of transfer to learners who are often perceived as objects of education. The position of teachers, management and policy makers in access to education is located at or as facilitators. The construction of knowledge according to constructivism philosophy originates and starts from the learners themselves. Thus, the teacher's position as a faciflitator seeks to transfer and strengthen the responsibility as much as possible and according to the portion of the learner. This research is based on qualitative research with a data search model using literature studies. The literature study brings together interrelated cross-disciplines between education management and Christian education management with the philosophy of the presence of participation in the philosophy of constructivism. The results show that constructivism philosophy takes responsibility, criticizes, responds, takes part in class discussions, forms circular seating (learning strategies), and contributes innovations and sees gaps that have not surfaced in the learning process.","PeriodicalId":113492,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET)","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i4.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper attempts to stitch the participation of constructivism philosophy in the space of management, education, education management, and Christian education management. Such cross-disciplinary stitching became the locus of observation as well as a response to the presence of constructivism philosophy through critical reflection in education located in Christianity. Constructivism in this paper seeks to see knowledge not as an object of transfer to learners who are often perceived as objects of education. The position of teachers, management and policy makers in access to education is located at or as facilitators. The construction of knowledge according to constructivism philosophy originates and starts from the learners themselves. Thus, the teacher's position as a faciflitator seeks to transfer and strengthen the responsibility as much as possible and according to the portion of the learner. This research is based on qualitative research with a data search model using literature studies. The literature study brings together interrelated cross-disciplines between education management and Christian education management with the philosophy of the presence of participation in the philosophy of constructivism. The results show that constructivism philosophy takes responsibility, criticizes, responds, takes part in class discussions, forms circular seating (learning strategies), and contributes innovations and sees gaps that have not surfaced in the learning process.
在基督教教育管理中引入建构主义哲学:反思调查
本文试图缝合建构主义哲学在管理学、教育学、教育管理学和基督教教育管理学中的参与。这种跨学科的缝合既是观察的中心,也是对建构主义哲学在基督教教育中的批判性反思的回应。本文中的建构主义试图将知识看作不是向学习者传授的对象,而学习者往往被看作是教育的对象。教师、管理者和政策制定者在受教育方面的定位是促进者或推动者。根据建构主义哲学,知识的建构起源于学习者本身。因此,教师作为促进者的定位是根据学习者的特点,尽可能地转移和加强责任。本研究以定性研究为基础,采用文献研究的数据搜索模式。文献研究将教育管理和基督教教育管理之间相互关联的交叉学科与建构主义哲学中的参与哲学结合在一起。研究结果表明,建构主义哲学的理念是承担责任、批评、回应、参与课堂讨论、形成循环座位(学习策略)、贡献创新以及看到学习过程中尚未浮现的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信