Sociodemographic decomposition of inequality in self-rated health: A cross-sectional study in Hubei, China

Xiaosheng Lei, Chaojie Liu
{"title":"Sociodemographic decomposition of inequality in self-rated health: A cross-sectional study in Hubei, China","authors":"Xiaosheng Lei, Chaojie Liu","doi":"10.56028/aehssr.8.1.177.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Health inequality is associated with profound social, health and economic costs. Despite extensive studies about inequality in health outcomes, our understanding of inequality in self-rated health is quite limited. This study aimed to determine the inequality in self-rated health and its associated factors in Hubei populations, China.  Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on the community residents purposively selected from six municipalities in Hubei province, China. Participants were asked to rate their health on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5. A total of 1336 valid questionnaires were collected. Inequality in self-rated health was assessed using concentration index and further decomposed to measure sociodemographic inequality in the health of residents.  Results: Two thirds (66%) of respondents rated their health as “excellent/very good/good”, while 34% rated it as fair or poor. The income-related concentration index was 0.0321 (95% CI, 0.0229 to 0.0413), indicating a concentration of poor self-rated health in the low-income groups. The CI of SRH in urban areas was 0.0239, which was lower than that in rural areas (0.0379). Age (17.5%) made the biggest contribution to the inequality in SRH, which was followed by employment (15.7%), income (8.5%), education (4.5%) and physical exercise (3.0%). Conclusions: There exist socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health in Hubei, China. Policy priorities should be given to rural area, the older people and those with low economic participation.","PeriodicalId":502379,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.8.1.177.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Health inequality is associated with profound social, health and economic costs. Despite extensive studies about inequality in health outcomes, our understanding of inequality in self-rated health is quite limited. This study aimed to determine the inequality in self-rated health and its associated factors in Hubei populations, China.  Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on the community residents purposively selected from six municipalities in Hubei province, China. Participants were asked to rate their health on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5. A total of 1336 valid questionnaires were collected. Inequality in self-rated health was assessed using concentration index and further decomposed to measure sociodemographic inequality in the health of residents.  Results: Two thirds (66%) of respondents rated their health as “excellent/very good/good”, while 34% rated it as fair or poor. The income-related concentration index was 0.0321 (95% CI, 0.0229 to 0.0413), indicating a concentration of poor self-rated health in the low-income groups. The CI of SRH in urban areas was 0.0239, which was lower than that in rural areas (0.0379). Age (17.5%) made the biggest contribution to the inequality in SRH, which was followed by employment (15.7%), income (8.5%), education (4.5%) and physical exercise (3.0%). Conclusions: There exist socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health in Hubei, China. Policy priorities should be given to rural area, the older people and those with low economic participation.
自评健康不平等的社会人口分解:中国湖北的横断面研究
目标:健康不平等会带来巨大的社会、健康和经济损失。尽管对健康结果的不平等进行了大量研究,但我们对自评健康不平等的了解却相当有限。本研究旨在确定中国湖北省人群自评健康的不平等及其相关因素。 研究方法我们从湖北省 6 个地级市的社区居民中进行了横断面问卷调查。受访者被要求用 1-5 分的李克特五点量表对自己的健康状况进行评分。共收集到 1336 份有效问卷。采用集中指数评估自评健康的不平等程度,并进一步分解以衡量居民健康的社会人口不平等程度。 结果显示三分之二(66%)的受访者将自己的健康状况评为 "优秀/很好/良好",34%的受访者将自己的健康状况评为 "一般或较差"。与收入相关的集中指数为 0.0321(95% CI,0.0229 至 0.0413),表明自评健康状况较差的人群集中在低收入群体中。城市地区 SRH 的集中指数为 0.0239,低于农村地区(0.0379)。年龄(17.5%)是造成性健康和生殖健康不平等的最大原因,其次是就业(15.7%)、收入(8.5%)、教育(4.5%)和体育锻炼(3.0%)。结论中国湖北省在自评健康方面存在社会经济不平等。政策重点应放在农村地区、老年人和经济参与度低的人群上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信