Inquiring about the link between urotensin-II and coronary collateral development in coronary artery patients with and without diabetes

Yasin Karakuş, Nusret Açikgöz
{"title":"Inquiring about the link between urotensin-II and coronary collateral development in coronary artery patients with and without diabetes","authors":"Yasin Karakuş, Nusret Açikgöz","doi":"10.38053/acmj.1330608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Coronary collateral circulation consists of vascular channels activated to maintain perfusion in major epicardial coronary arteries in severe stenosis or occlusion. Yet, coronary collateral development (CCD) in diabetic patients was previously proven to be poor. Urotesin-II (U-II) is famous for being the most potent vasoconstrictor agent, and plasma levels are known to elevate in diabetic patients and play an important role in diabetic complications. In this study, we inquired about the link between U-II levels and the development of coronary collaterals between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: We recruited 31 diabetic and 30 non-diabetic patients with 95% or more coronary artery stenosis or occlusion and considered Rentrop’s classification for grading collaterals. In this sense, while Rentrop grades 0-1 are regarded as poor CCD, Rentrop grades 2-3 correspond to well-developed collaterals. Moreover, we compared the patients’ serum levels of U-II by the degree of CCD. Results: The findings revealed that demographic characteristics did not significantly differ between the groups (p >0.05). Although CCD seemed worse in diabetic patients than those without diabetes (DM), the finding was not statistically significant. However, the diabetic patients had significantly higher U-II levels than non-diabetic patients (388.1±314.2 vs. 229.8±216.9, p=0.026). Despite not being significant, U-II levels were higher in patients with poor CCD than those with well-developed collaterals in the non-diabetic group (370.6±298; 178.6±158.3, p=0.2). In the diabetic group, on the other hand, U-II levels were significantly higher in patients with poor CCD and significantly lower in patients with good CCD (582.7±316.4 and 180.4±121.6, respectively; p","PeriodicalId":307693,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1330608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Coronary collateral circulation consists of vascular channels activated to maintain perfusion in major epicardial coronary arteries in severe stenosis or occlusion. Yet, coronary collateral development (CCD) in diabetic patients was previously proven to be poor. Urotesin-II (U-II) is famous for being the most potent vasoconstrictor agent, and plasma levels are known to elevate in diabetic patients and play an important role in diabetic complications. In this study, we inquired about the link between U-II levels and the development of coronary collaterals between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: We recruited 31 diabetic and 30 non-diabetic patients with 95% or more coronary artery stenosis or occlusion and considered Rentrop’s classification for grading collaterals. In this sense, while Rentrop grades 0-1 are regarded as poor CCD, Rentrop grades 2-3 correspond to well-developed collaterals. Moreover, we compared the patients’ serum levels of U-II by the degree of CCD. Results: The findings revealed that demographic characteristics did not significantly differ between the groups (p >0.05). Although CCD seemed worse in diabetic patients than those without diabetes (DM), the finding was not statistically significant. However, the diabetic patients had significantly higher U-II levels than non-diabetic patients (388.1±314.2 vs. 229.8±216.9, p=0.026). Despite not being significant, U-II levels were higher in patients with poor CCD than those with well-developed collaterals in the non-diabetic group (370.6±298; 178.6±158.3, p=0.2). In the diabetic group, on the other hand, U-II levels were significantly higher in patients with poor CCD and significantly lower in patients with good CCD (582.7±316.4 and 180.4±121.6, respectively; p
探究患有和未患有糖尿病的冠状动脉患者体内尿促性素-II 与冠状动脉侧支发展之间的联系
目的:冠状动脉侧支循环是在心外膜主要冠状动脉严重狭窄或闭塞时为维持灌注而激活的血管通道。然而,糖尿病患者的冠状动脉侧支发育(CCD)以前被证明很差。尿囊素-II(U-II)是最有效的血管收缩剂,众所周知,糖尿病患者血浆中的尿囊素-II水平会升高,并在糖尿病并发症中扮演重要角色。在这项研究中,我们探究了糖尿病和非糖尿病冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的 U-II 水平与冠状动脉瓣膜发展之间的联系。 研究方法我们招募了 31 名糖尿病患者和 30 名非糖尿病患者,这些患者的冠状动脉狭窄或闭塞程度达到或超过 95%。从这个意义上讲,Rentrop 0-1 级被认为是不良的 CCD,而 Rentrop 2-3 级则对应于发达的袢。此外,我们还根据 CCD 的程度比较了患者血清中的 U-II 水平。 结果研究结果显示,两组患者的人口统计学特征无明显差异(P>0.05)。虽然糖尿病患者的 CCD 似乎比非糖尿病(DM)患者更严重,但这一结果在统计学上并不显著。然而,糖尿病患者的 U-II 水平明显高于非糖尿病患者(388.1±314.2 vs. 229.8±216.9,P=0.026)。在非糖尿病组中,CCD 较差的患者的 U-II 水平(370.6±298;178.6±158.3,P=0.2)高于脉络发达的患者,尽管差异不明显。另一方面,在糖尿病组中,CCD 差的患者 U-II 水平明显较高,而 CCD 好的患者 U-II 水平明显较低(分别为 582.7±316.4 和 180.4±121.6;P=0.2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信