Strategic Alliance of Science and Theology: Nonviolent Resistance to Global Challenges and Antagonism

Faruk Hadžić
{"title":"Strategic Alliance of Science and Theology: Nonviolent Resistance to Global Challenges and Antagonism","authors":"Faruk Hadžić","doi":"10.25069/spmj.1210338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The starting point of this paper is that science and religion, alongside social and political dynamics, have massive effects on global challenges such as conflicts (national, geopolitical, ideological, or religious), environmental matters, growing radicalism, nationalism, or influence social justice. Historically, the relationship between science and religion has recently ranged from conflict to hostility. The normative action of mutual understanding and the interaction and cooperation between science and religion depend primarily on the participants (non-politized theologians and scientists), in constructive dialogue, particularly regarding global issues. Conflicting narratives between science and religion is an opportunity for joint learning and contribution to a better world and a compassionate culture. Therefore, the leading ideas of the discourse across borders are the promotion of synergy between sciences and religions, as well as cooperation between nations in promoting a compassionate society – an empathetic civilization. Nonviolent dissent to global challenges should be involved in changing the power imbalance as a source of structural violence, but the practice of liberation must focus on social justice, sociopolitical stability, and critical human security. In facing global challenges, science and religion must have diplomatic value by promoting mutual understanding and using a common language through collaboration. Religious traditions, and science, strengthened by global non-religious spiritualism as the valuable means of general spiritual growth, should assert a culture of peace and dialogue for transnational challenges. However, material science and theology are not explicitly formative to growing radical nationalism, racism, conflicts, hegemonism, destruction of the earth, and socioeconomic inequality. The healthy strategic union between science and religion enforced by ethical and constructive politics can support and enhance the resolution of global issues and antagonistic practices. Such a normative-formative framework should ensure that knowledge is developed to advance human, social, economic, and environmental goals according to the moral principles of each religion.","PeriodicalId":395315,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Public Management Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Public Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25069/spmj.1210338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The starting point of this paper is that science and religion, alongside social and political dynamics, have massive effects on global challenges such as conflicts (national, geopolitical, ideological, or religious), environmental matters, growing radicalism, nationalism, or influence social justice. Historically, the relationship between science and religion has recently ranged from conflict to hostility. The normative action of mutual understanding and the interaction and cooperation between science and religion depend primarily on the participants (non-politized theologians and scientists), in constructive dialogue, particularly regarding global issues. Conflicting narratives between science and religion is an opportunity for joint learning and contribution to a better world and a compassionate culture. Therefore, the leading ideas of the discourse across borders are the promotion of synergy between sciences and religions, as well as cooperation between nations in promoting a compassionate society – an empathetic civilization. Nonviolent dissent to global challenges should be involved in changing the power imbalance as a source of structural violence, but the practice of liberation must focus on social justice, sociopolitical stability, and critical human security. In facing global challenges, science and religion must have diplomatic value by promoting mutual understanding and using a common language through collaboration. Religious traditions, and science, strengthened by global non-religious spiritualism as the valuable means of general spiritual growth, should assert a culture of peace and dialogue for transnational challenges. However, material science and theology are not explicitly formative to growing radical nationalism, racism, conflicts, hegemonism, destruction of the earth, and socioeconomic inequality. The healthy strategic union between science and religion enforced by ethical and constructive politics can support and enhance the resolution of global issues and antagonistic practices. Such a normative-formative framework should ensure that knowledge is developed to advance human, social, economic, and environmental goals according to the moral principles of each religion.
科学与神学的战略联盟:以非暴力方式抵御全球挑战与对抗
本文的出发点是,科学和宗教与社会和政治动态一起,对全球性挑战产生巨大影响,如冲突(国家、地缘政治、意识形态或宗教)、环境问题、日益增长的激进主义、民族主义或影响社会正义。从历史上看,科学与宗教之间的关系近来从冲突到敌对。相互理解的规范行动以及科学与宗教之间的互动与合作主要取决于参与者(非政治化的神学家和科学家)的建设性对话,尤其是关于全球性问题的对话。科学与宗教之间的冲突是一个共同学习的机会,也是对更美好的世界和富有同情心的文化做出贡献的机会。因此,跨国界对话的主导思想是促进科学与宗教之间的协同作用,以及国家之间的合作,以促进富有同情心的社会--富有同情心的文明。对全球挑战的非暴力异议应涉及改变作为结构性暴力根源的权力失衡,但解放的实践必须关注社会正义、社会政治稳定和关键的人类安全。在面对全球挑战时,科学和宗教必须具有外交价值,通过合作促进相互理解并使用共同语言。宗教传统和科学作为普遍精神成长的宝贵手段,在全球非宗教灵性主义的强化下,应坚持和平与对话文化,以应对跨国挑战。然而,物质科学和神学对于日益增长的激进民族主义、种族主义、冲突、霸权主义、地球毁灭和社会经济不平等并没有明确的形成作用。在伦理和建设性政治的推动下,科学与宗教之间的健康战略结合可以支持和促进全球问题和对立做法的解决。这种规范性-形成性框架应确保知识的发展能够根据每个宗教的道德原则促进人类、社会、经济和环境目标的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信