Lecturers’ Perception of Moodle-based LMS in Speaking Class

Bramy Biantoro, R. Gusdian
{"title":"Lecturers’ Perception of Moodle-based LMS in Speaking Class","authors":"Bramy Biantoro, R. Gusdian","doi":"10.24903/sj.v8i2.1291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many Indonesian universities use Moodle-based LMS as suggested by the Ministry of Education. The study aimed at examining English Speaking course lecturers’ perception of Moodle-based LMS. Two important questions to dig out lecturers’ perceptions included supporting features in Moodle LMS preferred by lecturers in Speaking courses and how they perceive Moodle as the main LMS for Speaking courses. Methodology: Qualitative descriptive was utilized. Three Speaking course lecturers of English Language Education Department were selected based on some criteria. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data. The interview questions covered benefits of Moodle-based LMS in speaking class, support of LMS in learning speaking and learning autonomy, and possible problems during the use of LMS. The data were then transcribed into textual forms and analyzed narratively. Findings: Several menus preferred by lecturers were assignment, page, and quiz. There were also less preferred menus on Moodle, including video conference, attendance, and writing-oriented activities (i.e., chat and forum) menus. It is also found that participants held both positive and negative views towards Moodle. Conclusion: Major findings of the study suggest that Moodle offered a number of menus that were considered beneficial for the participants in conducting their classes. Generally, they also held positive perceptions towards the LMS and suggest some room for improvement for the LMS. Originality: Little attention has been paid to Moodle-based LMS is carried out and the lecturers’ perception on its implementation in the speaking classes. Thus, the current study is deemed necessary.","PeriodicalId":250621,"journal":{"name":"Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v8i2.1291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many Indonesian universities use Moodle-based LMS as suggested by the Ministry of Education. The study aimed at examining English Speaking course lecturers’ perception of Moodle-based LMS. Two important questions to dig out lecturers’ perceptions included supporting features in Moodle LMS preferred by lecturers in Speaking courses and how they perceive Moodle as the main LMS for Speaking courses. Methodology: Qualitative descriptive was utilized. Three Speaking course lecturers of English Language Education Department were selected based on some criteria. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data. The interview questions covered benefits of Moodle-based LMS in speaking class, support of LMS in learning speaking and learning autonomy, and possible problems during the use of LMS. The data were then transcribed into textual forms and analyzed narratively. Findings: Several menus preferred by lecturers were assignment, page, and quiz. There were also less preferred menus on Moodle, including video conference, attendance, and writing-oriented activities (i.e., chat and forum) menus. It is also found that participants held both positive and negative views towards Moodle. Conclusion: Major findings of the study suggest that Moodle offered a number of menus that were considered beneficial for the participants in conducting their classes. Generally, they also held positive perceptions towards the LMS and suggest some room for improvement for the LMS. Originality: Little attention has been paid to Moodle-based LMS is carried out and the lecturers’ perception on its implementation in the speaking classes. Thus, the current study is deemed necessary.
讲师对基于 Moodle 的 LMS 在口语课上的使用感受
背景: 根据教育部的建议,许多印尼大学使用基于 Moodle 的 LMS。本研究旨在考察英语课程讲师对基于 Moodle 的 LMS 的看法。要了解讲师们的看法,有两个重要问题,包括讲师们在口语课程中偏爱的 Moodle LMS 的辅助功能,以及他们如何看待 Moodle 作为口语课程的主要 LMS。 研究方法: 采用定性描述法。根据一些标准挑选了英语语言教育系的三位口语课程讲师。采用半结构式访谈收集数据。访谈问题包括基于 Moodle 的 LMS 在口语课上的优势、LMS 对口语学习和学习自主性的支持,以及使用 LMS 过程中可能出现的问题。然后将数据转录为文本形式,并进行叙事分析。 研究结果 讲师喜欢的几个菜单是作业、页面和测验。Moodle 上也有一些不太受欢迎的菜单,包括视频会议、考勤和以写作为主的活动(即聊天和论坛)菜单。研究还发现,参与者对 Moodle 持有积极和消极两种观点。 结论 研究的主要结果表明,Moodle 提供了许多菜单,这些菜单被认为有利于参与者开展课堂教学。总的来说,他们对学习管理系统持有积极的看法,并提出了学习管理系统需要改进的地方。 独创性: 基于 Moodle 的学习管理系统在口语课上的实施情况以及讲师对其的看法很少受到关注。因此,本研究被认为是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信