Ret Samadhi: Booker Award and Dialectics of South Asian Literature

Dr Amod Kumar Rai
{"title":"Ret Samadhi: Booker Award and Dialectics of South Asian Literature","authors":"Dr Amod Kumar Rai","doi":"10.53032/tcl.2023.8.5.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gitanjali Shree, now seen in the elite group of Booker winners, basically a teacher of English and social studies, has solicited a coveted recognition for herself with her brilliant writing skill in Hindi. Indian academics and literary sphere owe a rich tradition of such all-round competence of certain eminent personalities who having a commanding deft in their professional discipline flaunts an equal skill in a discipline of a different language. Many a shining name like Firaq Gorakpuri, Harivansh Rai Bachchan, Ram Villas Sharma, Madhav Kaushik, Anamika, Ashok Vajpayee and lastly, but not the least, to mention the name of Gitanjali Shree is a strong testimony that Indian intelligentsia is multidisciplinary. In the current monograph the author intends to analyze certain features in the dialectics of South Asian literature in Gitanjali Shree’s Booker Award winning work of Ret Samadhi, Tomb of Sand. One sole purpose of this investigation is to ascertain accuracy in her portrayal of Indian society in 21st century. If this portrayal conforms to the tradition of early Booker winner writers like Rushdi, Naipaul, Adiga, Desai and Roy or it has modulated the depiction of South Asian society with a distinguished prying into it. One of the arch constituents of South Asian dialectics is a vivid sketch of society with all its chores and an imitative representation of the entire zeitgeist. From this perspective how well, the authoress has succeeded in foregrounding the apparent and subterranean reality has to be weighed in this paper. There is an easily perceptible thread of commonality in almost all Indian Booker winner writers that is to expose even the hidden vulnerabilities of Indian society and to ignore even the most conspicuous beauties of it. Is Gitanjali also treading on the same path or she has her own trajectory with some distinction is another intent of this research paper.","PeriodicalId":370788,"journal":{"name":"The Creative Launcher","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Creative Launcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2023.8.5.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gitanjali Shree, now seen in the elite group of Booker winners, basically a teacher of English and social studies, has solicited a coveted recognition for herself with her brilliant writing skill in Hindi. Indian academics and literary sphere owe a rich tradition of such all-round competence of certain eminent personalities who having a commanding deft in their professional discipline flaunts an equal skill in a discipline of a different language. Many a shining name like Firaq Gorakpuri, Harivansh Rai Bachchan, Ram Villas Sharma, Madhav Kaushik, Anamika, Ashok Vajpayee and lastly, but not the least, to mention the name of Gitanjali Shree is a strong testimony that Indian intelligentsia is multidisciplinary. In the current monograph the author intends to analyze certain features in the dialectics of South Asian literature in Gitanjali Shree’s Booker Award winning work of Ret Samadhi, Tomb of Sand. One sole purpose of this investigation is to ascertain accuracy in her portrayal of Indian society in 21st century. If this portrayal conforms to the tradition of early Booker winner writers like Rushdi, Naipaul, Adiga, Desai and Roy or it has modulated the depiction of South Asian society with a distinguished prying into it. One of the arch constituents of South Asian dialectics is a vivid sketch of society with all its chores and an imitative representation of the entire zeitgeist. From this perspective how well, the authoress has succeeded in foregrounding the apparent and subterranean reality has to be weighed in this paper. There is an easily perceptible thread of commonality in almost all Indian Booker winner writers that is to expose even the hidden vulnerabilities of Indian society and to ignore even the most conspicuous beauties of it. Is Gitanjali also treading on the same path or she has her own trajectory with some distinction is another intent of this research paper.
Ret Samadhi:布克奖与南亚文学的辩证法
吉檀迦利-史瑞(Gitanjali Shree)如今已跻身布克奖获得者的精英行列,她基本上是一名英语和社会学教师,却以其出色的印地语写作技巧赢得了梦寐以求的认可。印度的学术界和文学界有着丰富的传统,某些杰出人士在自己的专业领域拥有全面的能力,但在不同的语言领域也拥有同样的技能。许多闪亮的名字,如 Firaq Gorakpuri、Harivansh Rai Bachchan、Ram Villas Sharma、Madhav Kaushik、Anamika、Ashok Vajpayee,以及最后但并非最不重要的 Gitanjali Shree,都有力地证明了印度知识分子是多学科的。在本专著中,作者打算分析吉檀迦利-史瑞的布克奖获奖作品《沙之墓》(Ret Samadhi)中南亚文学辩证法的某些特征。这项调查的唯一目的是确定她对 21 世纪印度社会的描述是否准确。这种描写是否符合早期布克奖获得者如拉什迪、奈保尔、阿迪加、德赛和罗伊等作家的传统,抑或是对南亚社会的描写有所调整,对其进行了杰出的窥探。南亚辩证法的主要内容之一是生动描绘社会的各种琐事,并对整个时代精神进行模仿性再现。从这个角度来看,本文必须权衡女作家成功地凸显了表层和深层现实的程度。几乎所有印度布克奖获得者的作品都有一个很容易察觉的共同点,那就是揭露印度社会隐藏的弱点,忽视印度社会最显而易见的美。吉檀迦利是否也走在同一条道路上,或者她是否有自己与众不同的轨迹,这是本研究论文的另一个意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信