Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma as an Adjunct to Core Decompression to Treatment Outcomes and Femoral Head Preservation in Avascular Necrosis of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Carlo F Fernandez, Byron S Angeles, Carmelo L Braganza
{"title":"Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma as an Adjunct to Core Decompression to Treatment Outcomes and Femoral Head Preservation in Avascular Necrosis of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Carlo F Fernandez, Byron S Angeles, Carmelo L Braganza","doi":"10.35460/2546-1621.2023-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head results from intraosseous pathology causing functional impairment. Early diagnosis allows conservative treatment like core decompression, delaying total hip arthroplasty. Objective: This meta-analysis aims to summarize platelet-rich plasma's (PRP) impact as an adjunct to core decompression (CD) on treatment outcomes and femoral head preservation in hip AVN. Methods: The study conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Med Line, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and previous meta-analyses from various databases. Using a random effects model, it compared PRP+CD with bone grafting to CD with bone grafting alone in AVN patients, evaluating function, pain scores, disease progression and the need for hip surgery. Results: The meta-analysis examined 1041 records and included three studies. The primary outcomes were function and pain scores using Harris Hip Scoring (HHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Postoperative HHS scores at final follow-up favored the PRP+CD group significantly over CD alone. Postoperative VAS scores showed a trend towards higher scores in the CD alone group. The PRP+CD group demonstrated higher survival from disease progression compared to CD alone. Overall, the study suggests that PRP+CD led to better functional outcomes and disease progression outcomes than CD alone in AVN of the hip. Conclusion: The PRP+CD treatment group showed significant benefits in AVN patients compared to CD alone, including higher HHS scores, improved disease progression survival and reduced need for hip surgery. Although PRP+CD resulted in decreased VAS scores, the difference was not statistically significant. Keywords : Avascular Necrosis/AVN, Osteonecrosis, Femoral Head, Platelet-Rich Plasma, Core Decompression and Randomized Controlled Trial","PeriodicalId":399180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35460/2546-1621.2023-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head results from intraosseous pathology causing functional impairment. Early diagnosis allows conservative treatment like core decompression, delaying total hip arthroplasty. Objective: This meta-analysis aims to summarize platelet-rich plasma's (PRP) impact as an adjunct to core decompression (CD) on treatment outcomes and femoral head preservation in hip AVN. Methods: The study conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Med Line, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and previous meta-analyses from various databases. Using a random effects model, it compared PRP+CD with bone grafting to CD with bone grafting alone in AVN patients, evaluating function, pain scores, disease progression and the need for hip surgery. Results: The meta-analysis examined 1041 records and included three studies. The primary outcomes were function and pain scores using Harris Hip Scoring (HHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Postoperative HHS scores at final follow-up favored the PRP+CD group significantly over CD alone. Postoperative VAS scores showed a trend towards higher scores in the CD alone group. The PRP+CD group demonstrated higher survival from disease progression compared to CD alone. Overall, the study suggests that PRP+CD led to better functional outcomes and disease progression outcomes than CD alone in AVN of the hip. Conclusion: The PRP+CD treatment group showed significant benefits in AVN patients compared to CD alone, including higher HHS scores, improved disease progression survival and reduced need for hip surgery. Although PRP+CD resulted in decreased VAS scores, the difference was not statistically significant. Keywords : Avascular Necrosis/AVN, Osteonecrosis, Femoral Head, Platelet-Rich Plasma, Core Decompression and Randomized Controlled Trial
富血小板血浆作为核心减压术的辅助手段对髋关节血管性坏死的治疗效果和股骨头保留的有效性: 随机对照试验的 Meta 分析
背景:股骨头血管性坏死(AVN)是由骨内病变导致的功能障碍。早期诊断可采取核心减压等保守治疗,从而推迟全髋关节置换术的时间。研究目的本荟萃分析旨在总结富血小板血浆(PRP)作为核心减压术(CD)的辅助手段对髋关节 AVN 治疗效果和股骨头保留的影响。研究方法该研究使用 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Science Direct、Google Scholar 和 Med Line 进行了全面的文献检索,包括各种数据库中的随机对照试验 (RCT) 和以往的荟萃分析。研究采用随机效应模型,比较了在 AVN 患者中使用 PRP+CD+ 植骨疗法和仅使用 CD+ 植骨疗法的效果,评估了患者的功能、疼痛评分、疾病进展和髋关节手术需求。分析结果荟萃分析研究了 1041 份记录,包括三项研究。主要结果是使用哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行的功能和疼痛评分。最终随访时的术后 HHS 评分显示,PRP+CD 组明显优于单纯 CD 组。术后 VAS 评分显示,单纯 CD 组的评分呈上升趋势。与单纯 CD 相比,PRP+CD 组的疾病进展存活率更高。总之,研究表明,在髋关节 AVN 的治疗中,PRP+CD 比单纯 CD 能带来更好的功能预后和疾病进展预后。结论与单纯 CD 相比,PRP+CD 治疗组对 AVN 患者有显著疗效,包括更高的 HHS 评分、更好的疾病进展存活率和更少的髋关节手术需求。虽然 PRP+CD 可降低 VAS 评分,但差异无统计学意义。关键词 :血管性坏死/AVN 骨坏死 股骨头 富血小板血浆 核心减压 随机对照试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信