Juridical Overview of the Authority for the Confiscation of Evidence in the Code of Criminal Procedure and Book II of the Technical Guidelines for Administration and Technical Guidelines for General and Special Criminal Court Proceedings of the Indonesia Supreme Court

Path of Science Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.22178/pos.97-21

Iga Okfida, Abdul Madjid, Setiawan Noedajasakti

{"title":"Juridical Overview of the Authority for the Confiscation of Evidence in the Code of Criminal Procedure and Book II of the Technical Guidelines for Administration and Technical Guidelines for General and Special Criminal Court Proceedings of the Indonesia Supreme Court","authors":"Iga Okfida, Abdul Madjid, Setiawan Noedajasakti","doi":"10.22178/pos.97-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This study aims to conduct a juridical review of the authority to seize evidence as regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP) and Book II of the Technical Guidelines for the Administration and Technicalities of General and Special Criminal Justice by the Supreme Court. The research involves the analysis of legal texts, namely KUHAP and relevant technical guidelines, and the review of pertinent literature. The research findings reveal that the Supreme Court clearly outlines the authority to seize evidence in the Indonesian criminal procedure in KUHAP and Book II of the Technical Guidelines for the Administration and Technicalities of General and Special Criminal Justice. However, certain ambiguities and variations in interpretation exist in its practical implementation. Therefore, there is a need for harmonisation and refinement of regulations and an enhancement of the understanding and awareness among legal practitioners regarding the authority to seize evidence. This research contributes significantly to understanding the role of evidence seizure in the Indonesian criminal justice system. It could improve legal practices related to the exercise of this authority.","PeriodicalId":19980,"journal":{"name":"Path of Science","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Path of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.97-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This study aims to conduct a juridical review of the authority to seize evidence as regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP) and Book II of the Technical Guidelines for the Administration and Technicalities of General and Special Criminal Justice by the Supreme Court. The research involves the analysis of legal texts, namely KUHAP and relevant technical guidelines, and the review of pertinent literature. The research findings reveal that the Supreme Court clearly outlines the authority to seize evidence in the Indonesian criminal procedure in KUHAP and Book II of the Technical Guidelines for the Administration and Technicalities of General and Special Criminal Justice. However, certain ambiguities and variations in interpretation exist in its practical implementation. Therefore, there is a need for harmonisation and refinement of regulations and an enhancement of the understanding and awareness among legal practitioners regarding the authority to seize evidence. This research contributes significantly to understanding the role of evidence seizure in the Indonesian criminal justice system. It could improve legal practices related to the exercise of this authority.

查看原文本刊更多论文

刑事诉讼法》和《印度尼西亚最高法院普通和特别刑事法院诉讼管理技术准则和技术准则》第二册中证据没收权的法理概述

.本研究旨在对《印度尼西亚刑事诉讼法》（KUHAP）和最高法院《普通和特别刑事司法管理和技术指南》第二册中规定的证据扣押权进行司法审查。研究涉及对法律文本（即 KUHAP 和相关技术指南）的分析，以及对相关文献的审查。研究结果表明，最高法院在 KUHAP 和《普通和特别刑事司法管理和技术性技术指南》第二册中明确概述了印尼刑事诉讼中扣押证据的权力。然而，在实际执行过程中存在着某些含糊不清和不同的解释。因此，有必要对相关法规进行协调和完善，并加强法律从业人员对扣押证据权的理解和认识。本研究对理解证据扣押在印尼刑事司法系统中的作用大有裨益。它可以改善与行使这一权力有关的法律实践。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Path of Science

自引率

0.00%

发文量