Comparative Analysis of Usual and Incidental Contractual Conditions in the Albanian and English Contract Law

Luan Hasneziri
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Usual and Incidental Contractual Conditions in the Albanian and English Contract Law","authors":"Luan Hasneziri","doi":"10.2478/ajbals-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The contract concluded by the parties, in addition to the essential conditions, which must necessarily exist in every contract; otherwise, it is invalid, also contains the usual conditions and the incidental conditions. This paper consists of two main issues. In the first case, the usual conditions and the incidental conditions will be treated according to contractual law in Albania. In the second case, these conditions will be addressed in accordance with English contract law, which is commonly referred to as “conditions negotiated by the parties”. The issues to be addressed in the first case pertain to the fundamental features that characterize the usual and incidental conditions under Albanian contract law, their content, and the consequences of their omission in the contract. In the second part of this paper, we will delve into the interpretation of miscellaneous clauses, both ordinary and incidental, under English contract law. We will explore the evolution in their interpretation within English judicial practice and examine the consequences of parties anticipating these terms. Particular attention will be paid to the challenges that have arisen in English judicial practice when resolving disputes between parties. In this manuscript, we will not only discuss the various positions held by different authors on this matter but also reference select decisions from English courts. In conclusion, we will provide a summary of results, focusing on the disparities between contractual law in Albania and UK concerning typical and incidental contract conditions. We will also address the issues that have arisen in the judicial practices of both countries, emphasizing the need for a fair and accurate interpretation of such conditions.","PeriodicalId":358300,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences","volume":"65 1","pages":"36 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ajbals-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The contract concluded by the parties, in addition to the essential conditions, which must necessarily exist in every contract; otherwise, it is invalid, also contains the usual conditions and the incidental conditions. This paper consists of two main issues. In the first case, the usual conditions and the incidental conditions will be treated according to contractual law in Albania. In the second case, these conditions will be addressed in accordance with English contract law, which is commonly referred to as “conditions negotiated by the parties”. The issues to be addressed in the first case pertain to the fundamental features that characterize the usual and incidental conditions under Albanian contract law, their content, and the consequences of their omission in the contract. In the second part of this paper, we will delve into the interpretation of miscellaneous clauses, both ordinary and incidental, under English contract law. We will explore the evolution in their interpretation within English judicial practice and examine the consequences of parties anticipating these terms. Particular attention will be paid to the challenges that have arisen in English judicial practice when resolving disputes between parties. In this manuscript, we will not only discuss the various positions held by different authors on this matter but also reference select decisions from English courts. In conclusion, we will provide a summary of results, focusing on the disparities between contractual law in Albania and UK concerning typical and incidental contract conditions. We will also address the issues that have arisen in the judicial practices of both countries, emphasizing the need for a fair and accurate interpretation of such conditions.
阿尔巴尼亚和英国合同法中通常和附带合同条件的比较分析
摘要 当事人订立的合同,除了每份合同都必须具备的基本条件(否则无效)之外,还包含通常条件和附带条件。本文包括两个主要问题。在第一种情况下,将根据阿尔巴尼亚的合同法处理通常条件和附带条件。在第二种情况下,将根据英国合同法处理这些条件,即通常所说的 "双方协商的条件"。第一种情况下要解决的问题涉及阿尔巴尼亚合同法规定的通常条件和附带条件的基本特征、其内容以及在合同中遗漏这些条件的后果。在本文的第二部分,我们将深入探讨英国合同法中对杂项条款(包括通常条款和附带条款)的解释。我们将探讨这些条款的解释在英国司法实践中的演变,并研究当事人预期这些条款的后果。我们将特别关注英国司法实践在解决当事人之间的争议时所面临的挑战。在本手稿中,我们不仅将讨论不同作者对此问题所持的各种立场,还将参考英国法院的部分判决。最后,我们将对结果进行总结,重点关注阿尔巴尼亚和英国合同法在典型和附带合同条件方面的差异。我们还将讨论两国司法实践中出现的问题,强调对此类条件进行公平、准确解释的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信