“Fantasy as Subversion”: Ray, Totalitarianism, and “Dissensus”

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Binayak Roy, Debanjali Dutta
{"title":"“Fantasy as Subversion”: Ray, Totalitarianism, and “Dissensus”","authors":"Binayak Roy, Debanjali Dutta","doi":"10.5325/jasiapacipopcult.8.2.0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Satyajit Ray’s faith in the integrity of his middle-class protagonists and his philosophical detachment coupled with his aesthetics of contemplation have often been brutally criticized by his Marxist critics. They have accused Ray of being a bourgeois humanist, a political effete without any specific ideology, estranged from tackling pressing contemporary social and political issues. The article attempts to trace Ray’s thoughts on cinema and analyze how his films, even those that seem to be fantasies, are not situated in a rarefied atmosphere but are determined by a number of sociopolitical events that intersect and interact in myriad ways. A ghost story by Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury, provided the filmmaker with the perfect narrative trope to critique what he considered the germs of contemporary social and political conditions, the vantage point from which his allegory could address not only the contemporary scenario but also the distant future. In his fantasy-based musicals Goopy Gyne Bagha Byne (The Adventures of Goopy and Bagha, 1969) and Hirak Rajar Deshe (The Kingdom of Diamonds, 1980), Ray decided to be at his subversive best. These films based on magic realism were not simply departures from his neo-realistic narratives but also veiled satires that indicted the establishment.","PeriodicalId":40211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jasiapacipopcult.8.2.0173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Satyajit Ray’s faith in the integrity of his middle-class protagonists and his philosophical detachment coupled with his aesthetics of contemplation have often been brutally criticized by his Marxist critics. They have accused Ray of being a bourgeois humanist, a political effete without any specific ideology, estranged from tackling pressing contemporary social and political issues. The article attempts to trace Ray’s thoughts on cinema and analyze how his films, even those that seem to be fantasies, are not situated in a rarefied atmosphere but are determined by a number of sociopolitical events that intersect and interact in myriad ways. A ghost story by Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury, provided the filmmaker with the perfect narrative trope to critique what he considered the germs of contemporary social and political conditions, the vantage point from which his allegory could address not only the contemporary scenario but also the distant future. In his fantasy-based musicals Goopy Gyne Bagha Byne (The Adventures of Goopy and Bagha, 1969) and Hirak Rajar Deshe (The Kingdom of Diamonds, 1980), Ray decided to be at his subversive best. These films based on magic realism were not simply departures from his neo-realistic narratives but also veiled satires that indicted the establishment.
"作为颠覆的幻想":雷、极权主义和 "共识"
萨蒂亚吉特-雷对中产阶级主人公正直的信念、哲学上的超脱以及他的沉思美学常常受到他的马克思主义批评家的猛烈抨击。他们指责雷是一个资产阶级人文主义者,是一个没有任何特定意识形态的政治庸才,疏于解决当代紧迫的社会和政治问题。本文试图追溯雷的电影思想,分析他的电影,甚至那些看似幻想的电影,是如何并非处于一种稀有的氛围中,而是由一系列社会政治事件所决定的,这些事件以无数种方式相互交织、相互作用。乌彭德拉基肖尔-雷-乔杜里(Upendrakishore Ray Chowdhury)的一个鬼故事为电影制作人提供了一个完美的叙事模式,以批判他所认为的当代社会和政治状况的萌芽,他的寓言不仅可以从这个有利的角度来探讨当代的情景,还可以探讨遥远的未来。在他的奇幻音乐片《Goopy Gyne Bagha Byne》(《Goopy 和 Bagha 历险记》,1969 年)和《Hirak Rajar Deshe》(《钻石王国》,1980 年)中,雷将他的颠覆性发挥到了极致。这些以魔幻现实主义为基础的电影不仅偏离了他的新现实主义叙事风格,而且还暗含着对当权者的讽刺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture
Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信