Capitalizing on art and artifying capitals: China’s journey to Venice and scandal around the Kenya Pavilion

IF 0.3 0 ART
Xing Zhao
{"title":"Capitalizing on art and artifying capitals: China’s journey to Venice and scandal around the Kenya Pavilion","authors":"Xing Zhao","doi":"10.1386/jcca_00089_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Embedded in a globalized framework, contemporary Chinese art operates as a powerful network of socio-economic and ideological relationships. Both China and Chinese artists have been assimilated into the global art system, which is firmly built on the basis of capitalism. The world saw a surge in artistic activism in the years between 2008 and 2014, with biennales emerging as the gravitational field in which left-wing theories critically addressed economic and cultural exploitation, as well as the disparities arising from the global capitalist system. While western discourses on contemporary art rejected complicity with the neo-liberal order, refusing to be reduced to ‘a consumable sign of opposition’, the Chinese artworld still upheld neo-liberal values at the Venice Biennale. The incidents involving Chinese artists ‘renting’ the Kenya Pavilion and representing Kenya for the 55th and 56th Venice Biennales in 2013 and 2015 became viral media sensations, prompting accusations of ‘neo-liberalism’ and ‘neo-colonialism’. This article takes the Venetian farce, with a focus on the Kenya Pavilion, as the point of departure to investigate the fame-driven image of China.","PeriodicalId":40969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca_00089_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Embedded in a globalized framework, contemporary Chinese art operates as a powerful network of socio-economic and ideological relationships. Both China and Chinese artists have been assimilated into the global art system, which is firmly built on the basis of capitalism. The world saw a surge in artistic activism in the years between 2008 and 2014, with biennales emerging as the gravitational field in which left-wing theories critically addressed economic and cultural exploitation, as well as the disparities arising from the global capitalist system. While western discourses on contemporary art rejected complicity with the neo-liberal order, refusing to be reduced to ‘a consumable sign of opposition’, the Chinese artworld still upheld neo-liberal values at the Venice Biennale. The incidents involving Chinese artists ‘renting’ the Kenya Pavilion and representing Kenya for the 55th and 56th Venice Biennales in 2013 and 2015 became viral media sensations, prompting accusations of ‘neo-liberalism’ and ‘neo-colonialism’. This article takes the Venetian farce, with a focus on the Kenya Pavilion, as the point of departure to investigate the fame-driven image of China.
艺术资本化和资本艺术化:中国的威尼斯之旅和围绕肯尼亚馆的丑闻
在全球化的框架下,中国当代艺术作为一个强大的社会经济和意识形态关系网络而运作。中国和中国艺术家都已被同化到牢固建立在资本主义基础上的全球艺术体系中。2008 年至 2014 年间,全球艺术行动主义风起云涌,双年展成为左翼理论批判经济和文化剥削以及全球资本主义体系造成的差距的引力场。西方关于当代艺术的论述反对与新自由主义秩序同流合污,拒绝沦为 "可消费的反对标志",而中国艺术界在威尼斯双年展上仍然坚持新自由主义的价值观。2013年和2015年,中国艺术家 "租用 "肯尼亚馆并代表肯尼亚参加第55届和第56届威尼斯双年展的事件在媒体上引起轰动,引发了对 "新自由主义 "和 "新殖民主义 "的指责。本文以威尼斯闹剧为切入点,以肯尼亚馆为重点,探究名利驱动下的中国形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信