Abstract 5 — Prediction of Flare Following Glucocorticoids Withdrawal in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Continuation of csDMARDs: A Real-Life Study

W. Xie, Zhuoli Zhang
{"title":"Abstract 5 — Prediction of Flare Following Glucocorticoids Withdrawal in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Continuation of csDMARDs: A Real-Life Study","authors":"W. Xie, Zhuoli Zhang","doi":"10.1142/s2661341723740218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), glucocorticoids (GC) should be firstly discontinued before considering tapering conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) or other biological agents. We aim to determine risk factors for flare after GC withdrawal in RA patients undergoing csDMARDs. Method RA patients who discontinued GC with continuation of csDMARD were selected from a longitudinal real-world cohort. Established RA was defined as disease duration over 12 months. Dissatisfied RA control was defined as the proportion of simplified disease activity index (SDAI)-based remission time to total time from GC initiation to discontinuation less than 50%. Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors for flare after GC discontinuation and results were expressed as odds ratio (OR). Results There were 115 eligible RA patients discounted GC with continuation of csDMARDs (methotrexate: 80%; hydroxychloroquine: 61%; csDMARDs combination: 79%). Of these, 24 patients experienced flare after GC discontinuation. Compared with relapse-free patients, flare patients were more likely to have established RA (75% vs. 49%, p=0.025), higher median cumulative prednisolone dosages (3.3g vs. 2.2g, p=0.004), and higher proportion of dissatisfied RA control during GC usage (66% vs. 33%, p=0.038). In multivariate analysis, significantly increased flare risk was predicted by established RA (OR 2.93 [1.02-8.43]), cumulative prednisolone dose > 2.5g (OR 3.69 [1.34-10.19]) and dissatisfied RA control (OR 3.00 [1.09-8.30]). Flare risk was increased with increases in number of risk factors, with highest OR of 11.56 in patients with three risk factors (p for trend=0.002). Conclusions Flare following GC withdrawal is not common in RA patients with undergoing csDMARDs therapy. Established RA, higher cumulative GC dose and dissatisfied RA control before GC discontinuation are important factors associated with flare after GC withdrawal.","PeriodicalId":15538,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661341723740218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), glucocorticoids (GC) should be firstly discontinued before considering tapering conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) or other biological agents. We aim to determine risk factors for flare after GC withdrawal in RA patients undergoing csDMARDs. Method RA patients who discontinued GC with continuation of csDMARD were selected from a longitudinal real-world cohort. Established RA was defined as disease duration over 12 months. Dissatisfied RA control was defined as the proportion of simplified disease activity index (SDAI)-based remission time to total time from GC initiation to discontinuation less than 50%. Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors for flare after GC discontinuation and results were expressed as odds ratio (OR). Results There were 115 eligible RA patients discounted GC with continuation of csDMARDs (methotrexate: 80%; hydroxychloroquine: 61%; csDMARDs combination: 79%). Of these, 24 patients experienced flare after GC discontinuation. Compared with relapse-free patients, flare patients were more likely to have established RA (75% vs. 49%, p=0.025), higher median cumulative prednisolone dosages (3.3g vs. 2.2g, p=0.004), and higher proportion of dissatisfied RA control during GC usage (66% vs. 33%, p=0.038). In multivariate analysis, significantly increased flare risk was predicted by established RA (OR 2.93 [1.02-8.43]), cumulative prednisolone dose > 2.5g (OR 3.69 [1.34-10.19]) and dissatisfied RA control (OR 3.00 [1.09-8.30]). Flare risk was increased with increases in number of risk factors, with highest OR of 11.56 in patients with three risk factors (p for trend=0.002). Conclusions Flare following GC withdrawal is not common in RA patients with undergoing csDMARDs therapy. Established RA, higher cumulative GC dose and dissatisfied RA control before GC discontinuation are important factors associated with flare after GC withdrawal.
摘要 5 - 继续使用 csDMARDs 的类风湿关节炎患者停用糖皮质激素后病情发作的预测:一项真实生活研究
背景 对于类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者,在考虑减量使用常规合成改善病情抗风湿药物(csDMARD)或其他生物制剂之前,应首先停用糖皮质激素(GC)。我们旨在确定接受 csDMARDs 治疗的 RA 患者停用 GC 后病情复发的风险因素。方法 从一个纵向真实世界队列中选取停用 GC 并继续使用 csDMARD 的 RA 患者。病程超过 12 个月即为已确立的 RA。对 RA 控制不满意的定义是,基于简化疾病活动指数(SDAI)的缓解时间占从开始使用 GC 到停药的总时间的比例低于 50%。采用逻辑回归分析停用 GC 后复发的独立风险因素,结果以几率比(OR)表示。结果 有115名符合条件的RA患者在继续使用csDMARDs(甲氨蝶呤:80%;羟氯喹:61%;csDMARDs联合用药:79%)的情况下对GC进行了折扣。其中,24 名患者在停用 GC 后复发。与未复发的患者相比,复发患者更有可能已建立RA(75%对49%,P=0.025),中位泼尼松龙累积剂量更高(3.3克对2.2克,P=0.004),使用GC期间对RA控制不满意的比例更高(66%对33%,P=0.038)。在多变量分析中,已确诊的 RA(OR 2.93 [1.02-8.43])、泼尼松龙累积剂量大于 2.5 克(OR 3.69 [1.34-10.19])和 RA 控制不满意(OR 3.00 [1.09-8.30])均可显著增加复发风险。随着风险因素数量的增加,复发风险也随之增加,具有三个风险因素的患者的 OR 值最高,为 11.56(趋势 p=0.002)。结论 在接受 csDMARDs 治疗的 RA 患者中,停用 GC 后发生发炎的情况并不常见。已确诊的RA、较高的GC累积剂量以及停用GC前对RA控制不满意是与停用GC后复发相关的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信