The Windmill Row Theatre and the Irish (1796–1804): Civilizing Sydney Cove’s Convict Society

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS
P. Kuch
{"title":"The Windmill Row Theatre and the Irish (1796–1804): Civilizing Sydney Cove’s Convict Society","authors":"P. Kuch","doi":"10.3366/iur.2023.0618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the role of the Irish, and the performance of Irishness, in the Windmill Row Theatre (1796–1804), which opened a mere eight years after the penal colony of Sydney Cove was established. Influenced by revisionist histories such as Grace Karskens’ The Colony: A History of Early Sydney (2010), and by recent research about the performativity of Irishness on the eighteenth-century London and Dublin stages, it enriches the view that the colony was intended to be ‘a society, not a gaol’. While it offers a corrective to the idea that Sydney Cove was ‘a subsistence colony that would transform felons into farmers’, it takes issue with Robert Jordan's argument in The Convict Theatres of Early Australia (2002) that the theatre would have had little impact on the Irish. It proposes that several plays that were staged constituted a social experiment to manage the gender imbalance in the colony, and also considers the impact of Irish political protest, the role of the 1798 Rising and the effect of the contentious ‘Union of Hearts’ of 1800 on the theatre. It further speculates about Irish convict access to Australia's first commercial theatre, which had its own specifically designed building, booking system, regime of admission prices, and paid staff and actors.","PeriodicalId":43277,"journal":{"name":"IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/iur.2023.0618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay examines the role of the Irish, and the performance of Irishness, in the Windmill Row Theatre (1796–1804), which opened a mere eight years after the penal colony of Sydney Cove was established. Influenced by revisionist histories such as Grace Karskens’ The Colony: A History of Early Sydney (2010), and by recent research about the performativity of Irishness on the eighteenth-century London and Dublin stages, it enriches the view that the colony was intended to be ‘a society, not a gaol’. While it offers a corrective to the idea that Sydney Cove was ‘a subsistence colony that would transform felons into farmers’, it takes issue with Robert Jordan's argument in The Convict Theatres of Early Australia (2002) that the theatre would have had little impact on the Irish. It proposes that several plays that were staged constituted a social experiment to manage the gender imbalance in the colony, and also considers the impact of Irish political protest, the role of the 1798 Rising and the effect of the contentious ‘Union of Hearts’ of 1800 on the theatre. It further speculates about Irish convict access to Australia's first commercial theatre, which had its own specifically designed building, booking system, regime of admission prices, and paid staff and actors.
风车行剧院与爱尔兰人(1796-1804 年):悉尼湾俘虏社会的文明化
这篇文章探讨了爱尔兰人在风车行剧院(Windmill Row Theatre,1796-1804 年)中所扮演的角色,以及爱尔兰人的表演。受格蕾丝-卡斯肯斯(Grace Karskens)的《殖民地》(The Colony:A History of Early Sydney》(2010 年)等修正主义历史著作的影响,以及近期对十八世纪伦敦和都柏林舞台上爱尔兰人表演性的研究,丰富了该殖民地旨在成为 "社会而非监狱 "的观点。该书纠正了悉尼湾是 "将重刑犯改造成农民的自给自足的殖民地 "这一观点,同时对罗伯特-乔丹(Robert Jordan)在《早期澳大利亚的囚犯剧院》(The Convict Theatres of Early Australia)(2002 年)中提出的戏剧对爱尔兰人影响甚微的论点提出了质疑。该书提出,上演的几部戏剧是管理殖民地性别不平衡的一种社会实验,还考虑了爱尔兰政治抗议的影响、1798 年起义的作用以及 1800 年有争议的 "心灵联盟 "对剧院的影响。报告还进一步推测了爱尔兰囚犯进入澳大利亚第一家商业剧院的情况,该剧院拥有自己专门设计的建筑、预订系统、票价制度以及带薪的工作人员和演员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW
IRISH UNIVERSITY REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1970, the Irish University Review has sought to foster and publish the best scholarly research and critical debate in Irish literary and cultural studies. The first issue contained contributions by Austin Clarke, John Montague, Sean O"Faolain, and Conor Cruise O"Brien, among others. Today, the journal publishes the best literary and cultural criticism by established and emerging scholars in Irish Studies. It is published twice annually, in the Spring and Autumn of each year. The journal is based in University College Dublin, where it was founded in 1970 by Professor Maurice Harmon, who edited the journal from 1970 to 1987. It has subsequently been edited by Professor Christopher Murray (1987-1997).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信