The Effect of Iraqi EFL University Students’ Critical Thinking Abilities on Their Use of Language Learning Strategies

Lihadh A. Kareem, Abbas Ali Rezaee
{"title":"The Effect of Iraqi EFL University Students’ Critical Thinking Abilities on Their Use of Language Learning Strategies","authors":"Lihadh A. Kareem, Abbas Ali Rezaee","doi":"10.55568/amd.v12i47.275-302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of critical thinking has formed a motivation for educators at different fields of education, such as EFL and ESL contexts. Similarly, the awareness of the importance of language learning strategies has been growing throughout the different stages of language learning history. The current study is planned to investigate the effect of EFL learners' critical thinking abilities on their use of the different language learning strategies. To this end, the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) were administered to 100 Iraqi EFL university students. A fifteen-week experiment was conducted in an attempt to improve the participants' critical thinking abilities. The findings reveal that there is a statistically significant relationship between the participants' use of the different language learning strategies and their critical thinking abilities. It is also found out that the effect of teaching critical thinking is most clear in the case of the use of memory strategies and less in the use of the affective strategies.","PeriodicalId":181525,"journal":{"name":"مجلة العميد مجلة فصلية محكمة تعنى بالابحاث والدراسات الإنسانية","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"مجلة العميد مجلة فصلية محكمة تعنى بالابحاث والدراسات الإنسانية","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55568/amd.v12i47.275-302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of critical thinking has formed a motivation for educators at different fields of education, such as EFL and ESL contexts. Similarly, the awareness of the importance of language learning strategies has been growing throughout the different stages of language learning history. The current study is planned to investigate the effect of EFL learners' critical thinking abilities on their use of the different language learning strategies. To this end, the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) were administered to 100 Iraqi EFL university students. A fifteen-week experiment was conducted in an attempt to improve the participants' critical thinking abilities. The findings reveal that there is a statistically significant relationship between the participants' use of the different language learning strategies and their critical thinking abilities. It is also found out that the effect of teaching critical thinking is most clear in the case of the use of memory strategies and less in the use of the affective strategies.
伊拉克 EFL 大学生的批判性思维能力对其使用语言学习策略的影响
批判性思维的重要性已成为不同教育领域(如 EFL 和 ESL)的教育工作者的动力。同样,在语言学习的不同历史阶段,人们对语言学习策略重要性的认识也在不断提高。本研究计划调查 EFL 学习者的批判性思维能力对他们使用不同语言学习策略的影响。为此,研究人员对 100 名伊拉克 EFL 大学生进行了语言学习策略量表(SILL)和沃森-格莱瑟批判性思维评估(WGCTA)的测试。进行了为期 15 周的实验,试图提高参与者的批判性思维能力。研究结果表明,受试者使用不同语言学习策略与他们的批判性思维能力之间存在统计学上的显著关系。研究还发现,批判性思维教学对记忆策略的使用效果最明显,而对情感策略的使用效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信