Biomarkers that Can Predict the Diagnosis of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on MR Images, Preoperatively.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
F. Soy, O. Pehlivan, B. Oktaş, M. Çirpar
{"title":"Biomarkers that Can Predict the Diagnosis of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on MR Images, Preoperatively.","authors":"F. Soy, O. Pehlivan, B. Oktaş, M. Çirpar","doi":"10.55095/achot2023/042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The competence of the anterior translation of tibia (ATT), posterior cruciate ligament angle (PCLA), and femorotibial rotation angle (FTRA) measured on MR images in predicting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury was evaluated in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS 266 patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy between 2015-2020 were included in this study. Age, gender, radiological fi ndings included ATT, PCLA, and FTRA were measured on preoperative MR images of all patients. RESULTS ACL tear was detected in 143 of patients and most of them were younger males. In ACL-R group, the ATT was 7 mm (-4-17 mm), PCLA value was 110º (52º-157º), and FTRA value was 5.8º (-5º-18º), while in ACL-I group, the ATT was approximately 5 mm (-4-12 mm), PCLA value was 122º (82º-162º) and FTRA value was 1.6º (-10.9º-10º) (p<0.001). ROCCurve test results showed that if ATT value was >6.05 mm (63% sensitivity, 65% specifi city) if PCLA value was <116.5º (65% sensitivity, 70% specifi city) and if FTRA value was >3.45º (73% sensitivity, 72% specifi city), these parameters could predict the probability of ACL tear, preoperatively. The Logistic Regression test results revealed that the PCLA and FTRA values could be the best markers to predict the probability of ACL tear, preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This study results showed that the ATT, PCLA, and FTRA values could be used as predictive markers in diagnosis of ACL tear, preoperatively. Among these three values, it was concluded that the FTRA could have the highest sensitivity and specifi city ratios and the best predictive value. Key words: anterior cruciate ligament tear, magnetic resonance imaging, arthroscopy, rotational instability, femorotibial rotation angle, anterior translation of the tibia, posterior cruciate ligament angle.","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2023/042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The competence of the anterior translation of tibia (ATT), posterior cruciate ligament angle (PCLA), and femorotibial rotation angle (FTRA) measured on MR images in predicting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury was evaluated in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS 266 patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy between 2015-2020 were included in this study. Age, gender, radiological fi ndings included ATT, PCLA, and FTRA were measured on preoperative MR images of all patients. RESULTS ACL tear was detected in 143 of patients and most of them were younger males. In ACL-R group, the ATT was 7 mm (-4-17 mm), PCLA value was 110º (52º-157º), and FTRA value was 5.8º (-5º-18º), while in ACL-I group, the ATT was approximately 5 mm (-4-12 mm), PCLA value was 122º (82º-162º) and FTRA value was 1.6º (-10.9º-10º) (p<0.001). ROCCurve test results showed that if ATT value was >6.05 mm (63% sensitivity, 65% specifi city) if PCLA value was <116.5º (65% sensitivity, 70% specifi city) and if FTRA value was >3.45º (73% sensitivity, 72% specifi city), these parameters could predict the probability of ACL tear, preoperatively. The Logistic Regression test results revealed that the PCLA and FTRA values could be the best markers to predict the probability of ACL tear, preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This study results showed that the ATT, PCLA, and FTRA values could be used as predictive markers in diagnosis of ACL tear, preoperatively. Among these three values, it was concluded that the FTRA could have the highest sensitivity and specifi city ratios and the best predictive value. Key words: anterior cruciate ligament tear, magnetic resonance imaging, arthroscopy, rotational instability, femorotibial rotation angle, anterior translation of the tibia, posterior cruciate ligament angle.
术前通过磁共振成像预测前交叉韧带损伤诊断的生物标志物
研究目的 本研究评估了在磁共振图像上测量的胫骨前移(ATT)、后交叉韧带角度(PCLA)和股胫旋转角度(FTRA)在预测前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤方面的能力。材料与方法 本研究纳入了 2015-2020 年间接受关节镜诊断的 266 例患者。在所有患者的术前磁共振图像上测量其年龄、性别、放射学检查结果(包括 ATT、PCLA 和 FTRA)。结果 143 名患者被检测出前交叉韧带撕裂,其中大部分为年轻男性。在前交叉韧带-R 组,ATT 为 7 毫米(-4-17 毫米),PCLA 值为 110º(52º-157º),FTRA 值为 5.8º(-5º-18º);而在前交叉韧带-I 组,ATT 约为 5 毫米(-4-12 毫米),PCLA 值为 122º(82º-162º),FTRA 值为 1.6º(-10.9º-10º)(p6.05 mm,灵敏度为 63%,特异度为 65%),如果 PCLA 值为 3.45º(灵敏度为 73%,特异度为 72%),这些参数可预测术前前交叉韧带撕裂的概率。逻辑回归测试结果显示,PCLA 和 FTRA 值是预测术前前交叉韧带撕裂概率的最佳指标。结论 该研究结果表明,ATT、PCLA 和 FTRA 值可作为术前诊断前交叉韧带撕裂的预测指标。在这三个值中,FTRA 的灵敏度和特异性比率最高,预测价值最高。关键词:前交叉韧带撕裂;磁共振成像;关节镜;旋转不稳定;股胫旋转角度;胫骨前移;后交叉韧带角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信