Strengthening home-school links through family literacy programmes: a comparative European case study

Anthea Rose, Chris Atkin
{"title":"Strengthening home-school links through family literacy programmes: a comparative European case study","authors":"Anthea Rose, Chris Atkin","doi":"10.54195/ijpe.18276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Family literacy programmes have become increasingly popular, particularly in England since the implementation of the Skills for Life (SfL) agenda (DfEE, 2001). Programmes are perceived by policy makers as a means of addressing low levels of literacy and numeracy in families who are viewed as underachieving, economically and socially, (Atkin, Rose and Shier, 2005). They can also be used to develop links between the home and school fields, (Bourdieu, 1977) and to re-engage adults who have a habitus (Bourdieu, 1993) of none-involvement with formal learning. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theoretical concepts of habitus and field this paper looks at family literacy programmes in England, Ireland and Malta and the role, if any, of such programmes in strengthening links between the home and school. Based on the findings of a European comparative doctoral study, research found that the fundamental difference between the three case study areas was the absence of children participating in family literacy programmes in Ireland compared to England and Malta largely due to the fact that in Ireland programmes did not involve schools. This paper explores reasons why programmes in Ireland are not delivered in conjunction with schools and the impact collaboration has on home and school relationships.","PeriodicalId":355712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal about Parents in Education","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal about Parents in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/ijpe.18276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family literacy programmes have become increasingly popular, particularly in England since the implementation of the Skills for Life (SfL) agenda (DfEE, 2001). Programmes are perceived by policy makers as a means of addressing low levels of literacy and numeracy in families who are viewed as underachieving, economically and socially, (Atkin, Rose and Shier, 2005). They can also be used to develop links between the home and school fields, (Bourdieu, 1977) and to re-engage adults who have a habitus (Bourdieu, 1993) of none-involvement with formal learning. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theoretical concepts of habitus and field this paper looks at family literacy programmes in England, Ireland and Malta and the role, if any, of such programmes in strengthening links between the home and school. Based on the findings of a European comparative doctoral study, research found that the fundamental difference between the three case study areas was the absence of children participating in family literacy programmes in Ireland compared to England and Malta largely due to the fact that in Ireland programmes did not involve schools. This paper explores reasons why programmes in Ireland are not delivered in conjunction with schools and the impact collaboration has on home and school relationships.
通过家庭扫盲计划加强家庭与学校的联系:欧洲案例比较研究
家庭扫盲计划越来越受欢迎,特别是在英格兰,自从生活技能(SfL)议程实施以来 (DfEE, 2001)。政策制定者认为,扫盲计划是解决被认为在经济和社会方面成绩不佳的家庭中识字和算术水平低下问题的一种手段(Atkin、Rose 和 Shier,2005 年)。它们还可用于发展家庭与学校之间的联系(布迪厄,1977 年),并重新吸引那些不参与正规学习的成年人(布迪厄,1993 年)。根据布迪厄的习惯和领域的理论概念,本文研究了英格兰、爱尔兰和马耳他的家庭扫盲计划,以及这些计划在加强家庭与学校之间联系方面的作用(如果有的话)。根据一项欧洲比较博士研究的结果,研究发现三个案例研究地区的根本区别在于,与英格兰和马耳他相比,爱尔兰没有儿童参与家庭扫盲计划,这主要是因为爱尔兰的计划不涉及学校。本文探讨了爱尔兰的计划没有与学校共同实施的原因,以及合作对家校关系的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信