Gaming Between Leisure and Addiction: How Young People Perceive Risk in Video Games

IF 1.4 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Kristian Haulund Jensen, T. Bengtsson
{"title":"Gaming Between Leisure and Addiction: How Young People Perceive Risk in Video Games","authors":"Kristian Haulund Jensen, T. Bengtsson","doi":"10.1177/10575677231212179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Young people's leisure activities are a subject of interest and concern. While criminal engagement is a key concern, video gaming has long been in focus for its possible deteriorating effects threatening societal values and interests. As it is often the case with studies on deviancy, studies on problematic gaming frequently rest upon an assumption that risk exists independently of everyday life context and thus use isolated “risk” variables to measure problematic gaming. Contrarily, this study argues that, in gaming, risk cannot be separated from everyday life. We analyze 35 qualitative interviews with young people and use social constructivist perspectives of risk to show how risk is embedded in everyday practices. We find two dominant risks: The risk of gaming monopolizing everyday life and the risk of overspending. Linked to these risks is the social risk of being excluded from the friendship group. We also find that young people integrate discourses of gaming addiction into their risk perceptions and that they actively strive to balance their gaming by avoiding “becoming addicted.” Our findings challenge assumptions that video games carry inherent risks of addiction and prompt an approach to risk in gaming as not being separated from the context of everyday life.","PeriodicalId":51797,"journal":{"name":"International Criminal Justice Review","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Criminal Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677231212179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young people's leisure activities are a subject of interest and concern. While criminal engagement is a key concern, video gaming has long been in focus for its possible deteriorating effects threatening societal values and interests. As it is often the case with studies on deviancy, studies on problematic gaming frequently rest upon an assumption that risk exists independently of everyday life context and thus use isolated “risk” variables to measure problematic gaming. Contrarily, this study argues that, in gaming, risk cannot be separated from everyday life. We analyze 35 qualitative interviews with young people and use social constructivist perspectives of risk to show how risk is embedded in everyday practices. We find two dominant risks: The risk of gaming monopolizing everyday life and the risk of overspending. Linked to these risks is the social risk of being excluded from the friendship group. We also find that young people integrate discourses of gaming addiction into their risk perceptions and that they actively strive to balance their gaming by avoiding “becoming addicted.” Our findings challenge assumptions that video games carry inherent risks of addiction and prompt an approach to risk in gaming as not being separated from the context of everyday life.
介于休闲与成瘾之间的游戏:年轻人如何看待电子游戏中的风险
年轻人的休闲活动是一个令人感兴趣和关注的话题。虽然犯罪活动是一个主要关注点,但电子游戏因其可能对社会价值观和利益造成的恶化影响而长期受到关注。与有关变态问题的研究一样,有关问题游戏的研究往往基于这样一种假设,即风险是独立于日常生活背景而存在的,因此使用孤立的 "风险 "变量来衡量问题游戏。与此相反,本研究认为,在游戏中,风险与日常生活是不可分割的。我们分析了 35 个对年轻人的定性访谈,并使用社会建构主义的风险视角来说明风险是如何嵌入日常生活实践中的。我们发现两种主要风险:游戏垄断日常生活的风险和过度消费的风险。与这些风险相关联的是被排除在友谊群体之外的社会风险。我们还发现,年轻人将游戏成瘾的论述融入他们的风险认知中,并积极努力通过避免 "成瘾 "来平衡他们的游戏。我们的研究结果对电子游戏固有成瘾风险的假设提出了质疑,并促使我们将游戏中的风险与日常生活中的风险区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Criminal Justice Review
International Criminal Justice Review CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: International Criminal Justice Review is a scholarly journal dedicated to presenting system wide trends and problems on crime and justice throughout the world. Articles may focus on a single country or compare issues affecting two or more countries. Both qualitative and quantitative pieces are encouraged, providing they adhere to standards of quality scholarship. Manuscripts may emphasize either contemporary or historical topics. As a peer-reviewed journal, we encourage the submission of articles, research notes, and commentaries that focus on crime and broadly defined justice-related topics in an international and/or comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信