Death benefit provisions in the Pension Funds Act 5 of 2019 of Lesotho: Contradictions or deliberate policy choices?

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Mtendeweka Mhango
{"title":"Death benefit provisions in the Pension Funds Act 5 of 2019 of Lesotho: Contradictions or deliberate policy choices?","authors":"Mtendeweka Mhango","doi":"10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the provisions in the Pension Funds Act 5 of 2019 (PFA 2019) that regulate the payment of death benefits after a member of a pension fund has died. While the article welcomes the death benefit provisions in the PFA 2019, it discusses two potential problems that will likely confront Lesotho as it implements those provisions. The first problem is the possible contradiction between sections 32 and 35(1) of the PFA 2019. The article suggests ways to avoid this potential contradiction short of amending the PFA 2019. The second problem is the absence of a definition of a \"dependant\" in the PFA 2019 and the constitutional implications of this. The article recommends reliance on the common-law definition of dependency or the inclusion of such a definition in the regulations to the PFA 2019.","PeriodicalId":41915,"journal":{"name":"De Jure","volume":"68 5-6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the provisions in the Pension Funds Act 5 of 2019 (PFA 2019) that regulate the payment of death benefits after a member of a pension fund has died. While the article welcomes the death benefit provisions in the PFA 2019, it discusses two potential problems that will likely confront Lesotho as it implements those provisions. The first problem is the possible contradiction between sections 32 and 35(1) of the PFA 2019. The article suggests ways to avoid this potential contradiction short of amending the PFA 2019. The second problem is the absence of a definition of a "dependant" in the PFA 2019 and the constitutional implications of this. The article recommends reliance on the common-law definition of dependency or the inclusion of such a definition in the regulations to the PFA 2019.
莱索托 2019 年第 5 号《养老基金法》中的死亡抚恤金条款:矛盾还是有意的政策选择?
本文讨论了 2019 年第 5 号《养老基金法》(PFA 2019)中关于养老基金成员死亡后死亡抚恤金支付的规定。文章对 2019 年《养老基金法》中的死亡抚恤金条款表示欢迎,同时也讨论了莱索托在实施这些条款时可能面临的两个潜在问题。第一个问题是 2019 年《养老金法》第 32 条和第 35(1)条之间可能存在的矛盾。文章提出了在不修订 2019 年《联邦宪法》的情况下避免这一潜在矛盾的方法。第二个问题是 2019 年《联邦公共财政法案》中缺乏 "受抚养人 "的定义及其宪法影响。文章建议依据普通法中受抚养人的定义,或在 2019 年《联邦公共财政法案》的条例中纳入该定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
De Jure
De Jure LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信