Telehealth for Equitable Obstetric Care

Sabrina Movitz, MS, Rachel Mayer Ediger, Alison Dingwall, Yvonne Butler Tobah
{"title":"Telehealth for Equitable Obstetric Care","authors":"Sabrina Movitz, MS, Rachel Mayer Ediger, Alison Dingwall, Yvonne Butler Tobah","doi":"10.30953/thmt.v8.443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2022, President Biden and Vice President Harris released their blueprint for addressing the maternal health crisis, stating their “vision for the future is that the United States will be considered the best country in the world to have a baby.” Currently, it is one of the worst among industrialized countries despite the US spending nearly double the average amount on healthcare per capita. The US is amidst a maternal mortality crisis, particularly for Black and American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people, with more than 80% of the deaths preventable. Telehealth in obstetrics has the potential to reach pregnant people who are not currently being served by the medical system and to improve rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality; however, more research is needed to understand and monitor its equity, costs, and optimal usage. Extant research shows that telehealth can produce a small positive effect for certain obstetric health outcomes, but these research findings are rarely stratified by pregnant patients’ demographics. To prevent the perpetuation of existing health inequities, gaps in obstetric telehealth research will need to be addressed. Key knowledge gaps for researchers and policy makers include outcomes, access, satisfaction by patients and providers, potential time savings for patients, and health system cost savings. Im​plementation of equitable obstetric coverage of telehealth services requires clarity from private and public payers for inter-state provisions of care, liability and risk, and service and payment parity.Note: While we use pregnant and postpartum people where possible here to recognize that not all pregnant people identify as women, we occasionally use maternal to reflect terminology used in federal, state, and local data.","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In June 2022, President Biden and Vice President Harris released their blueprint for addressing the maternal health crisis, stating their “vision for the future is that the United States will be considered the best country in the world to have a baby.” Currently, it is one of the worst among industrialized countries despite the US spending nearly double the average amount on healthcare per capita. The US is amidst a maternal mortality crisis, particularly for Black and American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people, with more than 80% of the deaths preventable. Telehealth in obstetrics has the potential to reach pregnant people who are not currently being served by the medical system and to improve rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality; however, more research is needed to understand and monitor its equity, costs, and optimal usage. Extant research shows that telehealth can produce a small positive effect for certain obstetric health outcomes, but these research findings are rarely stratified by pregnant patients’ demographics. To prevent the perpetuation of existing health inequities, gaps in obstetric telehealth research will need to be addressed. Key knowledge gaps for researchers and policy makers include outcomes, access, satisfaction by patients and providers, potential time savings for patients, and health system cost savings. Im​plementation of equitable obstetric coverage of telehealth services requires clarity from private and public payers for inter-state provisions of care, liability and risk, and service and payment parity.Note: While we use pregnant and postpartum people where possible here to recognize that not all pregnant people identify as women, we occasionally use maternal to reflect terminology used in federal, state, and local data.
远程保健促进公平产科护理
2022 年 6 月,拜登总统和哈里斯副总统发布了他们应对孕产妇健康危机的蓝图,并表示他们 "对未来的愿景是,美国将被视为世界上最适合生孩子的国家"。目前,尽管美国的人均医疗保健支出几乎是平均水平的两倍,但在工业化国家中,美国却是最差的国家之一。美国正处于孕产妇死亡危机之中,尤其是黑人和美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民孕妇,其中 80% 以上的死亡是可以预防的。产科远程保健有可能惠及目前未得到医疗系统服务的孕妇,并提高严重孕产妇的发病率和死亡率;然而,还需要更多的研究来了解和监测其公平性、成本和最佳使用情况。现有研究表明,远程保健对某些产科健康结果能产生微小的积极影响,但这些研究结果很少按怀孕患者的人口统计学特征进行分层。为防止现有的健康不公平现象继续存在,需要解决产科远程保健研究中的差距。研究人员和政策制定者的主要知识差距包括结果、使用、患者和医疗服务提供者的满意度、患者可能节省的时间以及医疗系统节省的成本。要实现产科远程医疗服务的公平覆盖,需要私人和公共支付方明确州际医疗服务的规定、责任和风险,以及服务和支付的平等性。注:虽然我们在此尽可能使用孕妇和产后人群,以承认并非所有孕妇都被认定为女性,但我们偶尔也使用孕产妇来反映联邦、州和地方数据中使用的术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信