A Study of Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Diversity in the River Sabarmati, Gujarat, India

Krishnakumar Vaghela, Devangee Shukla, Nayan K. Jain
{"title":"A Study of Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Diversity in the River Sabarmati, Gujarat, India","authors":"Krishnakumar Vaghela, Devangee Shukla, Nayan K. Jain","doi":"10.9734/ajee/2023/v22i4505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abiotic and biotic components are divided into two categories to describe the structural ecosystem. Aquatic plants and animals can find a suitable habitat in the river's water body. Planktons are an important component of the wetland ecology and may serve as a marker of altering water quality. Zooplankton mostly obtains its nutrition from phytoplankton, an ecosystem producer. Most fish larvae and other plankton-eating fishes feed primarily on zooplankton species. All aquatic ecosystems' dynamics revolve around primary productivity, which sustains various food chains and food webs. The overgrowth of macrophytes, pesticides from agricultural runoff, household garbage, sewage sludge, feces near rivers, bathing of domestic animals, washing of clothing and utensils, etc. have all put pressure on river ecosystems over the past many years. Most plants and animals struggle to survive in polluted environments, but those that can handle the stress of pollution on their own may be able to. These creatures can serve as pollution indicators, or more particularly, as bioindicators of the ecosystem's trophic condition. In this article, Sabarmati River's phytoplankton and zooplankton communities were evaluated at six different locations. The current investigations were researched from January 2017 to December 2019 over a period of around 3 years.  Several published plankton manuals were used for plankton collection and identification. Aquatic flora analyzed here in two respects i.e., phytoplankton and aquatic vegetation or aquatic weeds. Phytoplankton were represented by four groups, viz. Bacilariophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Cyanophyceae, and Euglenophyceae. Diversity study reveals common planktonic forms present at different sites of sampling. In general, aquatic weeds like Hydrilla, Valesneria, Chara, Nymphea, Pistia, Typha etc. were commonly found in the study area. Protozoa, Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifers are the main groups of zooplankton found in freshwater bodies. Six Molluscans and sixteen Arthropods were identified to be the most commonly occurring riparian fauna. The annual values of all zooplankton showed greater densities at site-1 and site-6 followed by other sites, respectively. When the data were analyzed for contribution of each phylum to the overall zooplankton densities, it was dominated by Protozoa and Arthropods throughout the study period. This was followed by Rotifera, Annelid and Nematoda, respectively. The percentile composition of protozoan fauna at six study sites suggested that on more than half of the sampling occasions their major contribution was recorded at sites 1, 2 and 6  followed by sites 5, 4 and 3, respectively.","PeriodicalId":502350,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajee/2023/v22i4505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abiotic and biotic components are divided into two categories to describe the structural ecosystem. Aquatic plants and animals can find a suitable habitat in the river's water body. Planktons are an important component of the wetland ecology and may serve as a marker of altering water quality. Zooplankton mostly obtains its nutrition from phytoplankton, an ecosystem producer. Most fish larvae and other plankton-eating fishes feed primarily on zooplankton species. All aquatic ecosystems' dynamics revolve around primary productivity, which sustains various food chains and food webs. The overgrowth of macrophytes, pesticides from agricultural runoff, household garbage, sewage sludge, feces near rivers, bathing of domestic animals, washing of clothing and utensils, etc. have all put pressure on river ecosystems over the past many years. Most plants and animals struggle to survive in polluted environments, but those that can handle the stress of pollution on their own may be able to. These creatures can serve as pollution indicators, or more particularly, as bioindicators of the ecosystem's trophic condition. In this article, Sabarmati River's phytoplankton and zooplankton communities were evaluated at six different locations. The current investigations were researched from January 2017 to December 2019 over a period of around 3 years.  Several published plankton manuals were used for plankton collection and identification. Aquatic flora analyzed here in two respects i.e., phytoplankton and aquatic vegetation or aquatic weeds. Phytoplankton were represented by four groups, viz. Bacilariophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Cyanophyceae, and Euglenophyceae. Diversity study reveals common planktonic forms present at different sites of sampling. In general, aquatic weeds like Hydrilla, Valesneria, Chara, Nymphea, Pistia, Typha etc. were commonly found in the study area. Protozoa, Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifers are the main groups of zooplankton found in freshwater bodies. Six Molluscans and sixteen Arthropods were identified to be the most commonly occurring riparian fauna. The annual values of all zooplankton showed greater densities at site-1 and site-6 followed by other sites, respectively. When the data were analyzed for contribution of each phylum to the overall zooplankton densities, it was dominated by Protozoa and Arthropods throughout the study period. This was followed by Rotifera, Annelid and Nematoda, respectively. The percentile composition of protozoan fauna at six study sites suggested that on more than half of the sampling occasions their major contribution was recorded at sites 1, 2 and 6  followed by sites 5, 4 and 3, respectively.
印度古吉拉特邦萨巴尔马蒂河浮游植物和浮游动物多样性研究
非生物成分和生物成分分为两类来描述结构性生态系统。水生动植物可以在河流水体中找到合适的栖息地。浮游生物是湿地生态的重要组成部分,可作为水质改变的标志。浮游动物主要从浮游植物中获取营养,浮游植物是生态系统的生产者。大多数鱼类幼体和其他吃浮游生物的鱼类主要以浮游动物为食。所有水生生态系统的动态都围绕着初级生产力,初级生产力维持着各种食物链和食物网。在过去的许多年里,大型植物的过度生长、农业径流产生的杀虫剂、生活垃圾、污水污泥、河流附近的粪便、家畜洗澡、衣物和用具的清洗等都给河流生态系统带来了压力。大多数植物和动物都难以在污染的环境中生存,但那些能够独自承受污染压力的植物和动物或许能够生存下来。这些生物可以作为污染指标,尤其是生态系统营养状况的生物指标。本文对萨巴尔马蒂河六个不同地点的浮游植物和浮游动物群落进行了评估。本次调查的研究时间为 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,历时约 3 年。 浮游生物的收集和鉴定使用了几本已出版的浮游生物手册。这里分析的水生植物群包括两个方面,即浮游植物和水生植被或水草。浮游植物分为四类,即藻类(Bacilariophyceae)、叶绿藻类(Chlorophyceae)、藻类(Cyanophyceae)和藻类(Euglenophyceae)。多样性研究揭示了不同采样地点常见的浮游生物形式。一般来说,研究区域常见的水生杂草有水草(Hydrilla)、缬草(Valesneria)、胭脂鱼(Chara)、鱼腥草(Nymphea)、鱼腥草(Pistia)、香蒲(Typha)等。原生动物、栉水母、桡足类和轮虫是淡水水体中发现的主要浮游动物类群。经鉴定,6 种软体动物和 16 种节肢动物是最常见的河岸动物群。所有浮游动物的年度值显示,1 号地点和 6 号地点的浮游动物密度较大,其他地点次之。在分析各门类对浮游动物总体密度的贡献时,发现在整个研究期间,原生动物和节肢动物占主导地位。其次分别是轮虫纲、环节动物纲和线虫纲。六个研究地点的原生动物百分位数组成表明,在一半以上的采样次数中,原生动物的主要分布地点分别是 1、2 和 6 号地点,其次是 5、4 和 3 号地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信