The Narrative of Postmodern Ethics in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road

Huitong Chang
{"title":"The Narrative of Postmodern Ethics in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road","authors":"Huitong Chang","doi":"10.22158/wjeh.v5n4p130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Road has been called a “post-apocalyptic novel”, reflecting the ethical elements in the novel. From the perspective of rhetorical narratology, the rhetorical devices Cormac McCarthy used helped convey his postmodern ethics, which was uncertain and full of dilemmas. Firstly, McCarthy reversed the Grail motif and Abraham archetype in The Road, questioning the certainty of universal ethics and absolute faith based on the requirements of modernity with the Christian tradition. Besides, McCarthy used impersonal, debating dialogues to reveal ethical dilemmas, making both sides speak, then set neutral plots without favoring either side, which showed the ambiguity and difficulty of the ethical choices and guided the readers to reflect from both sides. Meanwhile, McCarthy portrayed the protagonists with both clarity and ambiguity, making the readers sympathetic but still make independent ethical judgement. He also portrayed clear faces of the passers-by to convey the theme of the Other, so as to make the readers feel the responsibility they had to strangers. By seeing the Other and making choices independently in moral dilemmas, individuals attain postmodern moral subjectivity.","PeriodicalId":228342,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Education and Humanities","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Education and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/wjeh.v5n4p130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Road has been called a “post-apocalyptic novel”, reflecting the ethical elements in the novel. From the perspective of rhetorical narratology, the rhetorical devices Cormac McCarthy used helped convey his postmodern ethics, which was uncertain and full of dilemmas. Firstly, McCarthy reversed the Grail motif and Abraham archetype in The Road, questioning the certainty of universal ethics and absolute faith based on the requirements of modernity with the Christian tradition. Besides, McCarthy used impersonal, debating dialogues to reveal ethical dilemmas, making both sides speak, then set neutral plots without favoring either side, which showed the ambiguity and difficulty of the ethical choices and guided the readers to reflect from both sides. Meanwhile, McCarthy portrayed the protagonists with both clarity and ambiguity, making the readers sympathetic but still make independent ethical judgement. He also portrayed clear faces of the passers-by to convey the theme of the Other, so as to make the readers feel the responsibility they had to strangers. By seeing the Other and making choices independently in moral dilemmas, individuals attain postmodern moral subjectivity.
科马克-麦卡锡《大路》中的后现代伦理叙事
大路》被称为 "后启示录小说",反映了小说中的伦理元素。从修辞叙事学的角度来看,科马克-麦卡锡所使用的修辞手法有助于传达其充满不确定性和困境的后现代伦理。首先,麦卡锡在《大路》中颠覆了圣杯主题和亚伯拉罕原型,以基督教传统质疑基于现代性要求的普世伦理和绝对信仰的确定性。其次,麦卡锡用非个人化的辩论式对话揭示伦理困境,让双方都说话,然后设置中立情节,不偏袒任何一方,表现出伦理选择的模糊性和艰难性,引导读者从正反两方面进行反思。同时,麦卡锡对主人公的刻画既清晰又模糊,让读者在同情的同时仍能做出独立的伦理判断。他还刻画了清晰的路人面孔,传达了 "他者 "的主题,让读者感受到自己对陌生人的责任。通过看到他者,并在道德困境中独立做出选择,个人获得了后现代道德主体性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信