The perceived quality of social interactions differs by modality and purpose: An event-contingent experience sampling study with older adults

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Gizem Hülür, Minxia Luo, Birthe Macdonald, Carlotta E. Grünjes
{"title":"The perceived quality of social interactions differs by modality and purpose: An event-contingent experience sampling study with older adults","authors":"Gizem Hülür, Minxia Luo, Birthe Macdonald, Carlotta E. Grünjes","doi":"10.1177/02654075231215269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older adults increasingly use digital technologies to communicate with others. The goal of the present study is to understand the role of interaction modality for the perceived quality of social interactions. We use data from 118 participants (age: M = 72 years, SD = 5, range = 65 to 94; 40% women), who reported on their social interactions (quality [valence, social relatedness, calmness, meaningfulness], modality [face-to-face in-person, telephone, text-based digital], and purposes [e.g., small talk, conflict]) over 21 days in an event-contingent experience sampling study that took place between April and November 2019. Text-based communication was rated lower in valence and social relatedness relative to face-to-face communication and telephone calls, and lower in meaningfulness relative to telephone calls. Face-to-face and telephone communication only differed in meaningfulness, with telephone calls being rated higher. Some of the associations between interaction modality and perceived quality were moderated by interaction purpose. For example, conflicts were perceived more negatively as indicated by lower valence, social relatedness, and calmness when they were carried out by text messages (vs. face-to-face or by telephone). Conflicts were rated higher in valence when they took place by telephone versus face-to-face. In summary, our findings suggest that the modality of daily social interactions plays an important role for their quality. We discuss implications of these findings for increasing well-being and social connectedness through technology-mediated communication.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231215269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults increasingly use digital technologies to communicate with others. The goal of the present study is to understand the role of interaction modality for the perceived quality of social interactions. We use data from 118 participants (age: M = 72 years, SD = 5, range = 65 to 94; 40% women), who reported on their social interactions (quality [valence, social relatedness, calmness, meaningfulness], modality [face-to-face in-person, telephone, text-based digital], and purposes [e.g., small talk, conflict]) over 21 days in an event-contingent experience sampling study that took place between April and November 2019. Text-based communication was rated lower in valence and social relatedness relative to face-to-face communication and telephone calls, and lower in meaningfulness relative to telephone calls. Face-to-face and telephone communication only differed in meaningfulness, with telephone calls being rated higher. Some of the associations between interaction modality and perceived quality were moderated by interaction purpose. For example, conflicts were perceived more negatively as indicated by lower valence, social relatedness, and calmness when they were carried out by text messages (vs. face-to-face or by telephone). Conflicts were rated higher in valence when they took place by telephone versus face-to-face. In summary, our findings suggest that the modality of daily social interactions plays an important role for their quality. We discuss implications of these findings for increasing well-being and social connectedness through technology-mediated communication.
社交互动的感知质量因方式和目的而异:一项针对老年人的事件权变经验取样研究
老年人越来越多地使用数字技术与他人交流。本研究的目的是了解互动模式在感知社交互动质量方面的作用。我们使用了 118 名参与者(年龄:M = 72 岁,SD = 5,范围 = 65 至 94;40% 为女性)的数据,他们在 2019 年 4 月至 11 月期间进行的一项事件权变经验取样研究中,报告了 21 天内的社交互动(质量[价值感、社会相关性、平静感、有意义]、方式[面对面亲身交流、电话、基于文本的数字交流]和目的[如闲聊、冲突])。与面对面交流和电话交流相比,文本交流在情感和社会相关性方面的评分较低;与电话交流相比,文本交流在意义方面的评分较低。面对面交流和电话交流仅在意义性方面存在差异,电话交流的意义性评分更高。互动方式与感知质量之间的某些关联受互动目的的调节。例如,通过短信(与面对面交流或电话交流相比)进行交流时,冲突的负面感知较低,表现为冲突的价值感、社会相关性和平静感较低。当冲突是通过电话而不是面对面的方式发生时,冲突的价值评价较高。总之,我们的研究结果表明,日常社交互动的方式对社交互动的质量起着重要作用。我们将讨论这些研究结果对通过以技术为媒介的交流来提高幸福感和社会联系的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信