Quantitative assessment of the breast implant malposition after augmentation mammaplasty

Y. Susak, А. B. І. Mohammad
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of the breast implant malposition after augmentation mammaplasty","authors":"Y. Susak, А. B. І. Mohammad","doi":"10.30978/gs-2023-2-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Slight displacement of breast implants from initial positioning is expected and inherent in submuscular augmentation mammoplasty (SAMP). However, due to various factors, displacement of implants can progress, causing discomfort, changes in the shape of the breast, and deterioration of aesthetics. The boundary between normality and pathology in the case of displacement of the mammary glands (MG) implants is currently unclear due to various reasons, including the lack of a quantitative measure of its assessment. Objective — to develop a quantitative assessment of breast implant malposition (BIM) and to determine its one‑year frequency within a year after SAMP. Materials and methods. The study included 112 women who underwent SAMP for hypomastia in the period from 2020 to 2022 at the Bogomolets National Medical University. The average age was 34.1±6.7 years, body mass index — 20.4±1.8 kg/m2; 78 (69.6%) women had a history of pregnancy and childbirth, and 75 (67.0%) were breastfeeding. Round prostheses with a smooth surface were implanted in all patients. The value of BIM was evaluated one year after SAMP according to the developed method as a percentage of the increase in the area of the non‑ossified area in relation to the area of the prosthesis. Results. In all women, there was a 7.94.5% (from 1.5% to 34.5%) displacement of the implants from their initial location in all MG. Among the vectors of BIM, lower‑lateral ones prevailed — 124 (55.4%) MG compared to 53 (28.6%) upper‑lateral ones, p=0.001. Lower 18 (8.0%) and upper‑lateral at 150° — 11 (4.9%) BIM were the least common. Symmetrical matching of prosthesis movement vectors in both MGs was observed in 75 (67.0%) women; in 37 (33.0%), they were different. The same values of BIM in both MGs were observed in 54 (48.2%) women. In other cases, the values of BIM were greater in the right MG — 40 (35.7%) or in the left MG — 18 (16.1%). Cluster analysis classified the displacement of implants into 4 degrees: the first — from 1.5% to 6.4%, the second — from 6.5% to 10.4%, the third — from 10.5% to 20.0%, and the fourth >20.0%. Conclusions. Using smooth‑surfaced, round implants, the displacement of all implants from their initial site was shown to be 7.9±4.5% one year following SAMP.","PeriodicalId":12661,"journal":{"name":"General Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30978/gs-2023-2-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slight displacement of breast implants from initial positioning is expected and inherent in submuscular augmentation mammoplasty (SAMP). However, due to various factors, displacement of implants can progress, causing discomfort, changes in the shape of the breast, and deterioration of aesthetics. The boundary between normality and pathology in the case of displacement of the mammary glands (MG) implants is currently unclear due to various reasons, including the lack of a quantitative measure of its assessment. Objective — to develop a quantitative assessment of breast implant malposition (BIM) and to determine its one‑year frequency within a year after SAMP. Materials and methods. The study included 112 women who underwent SAMP for hypomastia in the period from 2020 to 2022 at the Bogomolets National Medical University. The average age was 34.1±6.7 years, body mass index — 20.4±1.8 kg/m2; 78 (69.6%) women had a history of pregnancy and childbirth, and 75 (67.0%) were breastfeeding. Round prostheses with a smooth surface were implanted in all patients. The value of BIM was evaluated one year after SAMP according to the developed method as a percentage of the increase in the area of the non‑ossified area in relation to the area of the prosthesis. Results. In all women, there was a 7.94.5% (from 1.5% to 34.5%) displacement of the implants from their initial location in all MG. Among the vectors of BIM, lower‑lateral ones prevailed — 124 (55.4%) MG compared to 53 (28.6%) upper‑lateral ones, p=0.001. Lower 18 (8.0%) and upper‑lateral at 150° — 11 (4.9%) BIM were the least common. Symmetrical matching of prosthesis movement vectors in both MGs was observed in 75 (67.0%) women; in 37 (33.0%), they were different. The same values of BIM in both MGs were observed in 54 (48.2%) women. In other cases, the values of BIM were greater in the right MG — 40 (35.7%) or in the left MG — 18 (16.1%). Cluster analysis classified the displacement of implants into 4 degrees: the first — from 1.5% to 6.4%, the second — from 6.5% to 10.4%, the third — from 10.5% to 20.0%, and the fourth >20.0%. Conclusions. Using smooth‑surfaced, round implants, the displacement of all implants from their initial site was shown to be 7.9±4.5% one year following SAMP.
隆胸术后乳房假体错位的定量评估
在肌肉下隆胸术(SAMP)中,乳房假体从初始位置发生轻微移位是意料之中的,也是固有的。然而,由于各种因素的影响,假体移位可能会继续发展,导致不适、乳房形状改变和美观度下降。由于各种原因,包括缺乏定量评估方法,乳腺(MG)假体移位的正常与病理界限目前尚不明确。 目的--对乳房植入物错位(BIM)进行定量评估,并确定其在 SAMP 一年内的发生频率。 材料和方法。研究对象包括 2020 年至 2022 年期间在国立波哥莫列茨医科大学接受 SAMP 治疗乳房发育不良的 112 名女性。平均年龄为(34.1±6.7)岁,体重指数为(20.4±1.8)kg/m2;78 名(69.6%)妇女有怀孕和分娩史,75 名(67.0%)妇女处于哺乳期。所有患者都植入了表面光滑的圆形假体。根据开发的方法,在 SAMP 一年后评估了 BIM 值,即非骨化区域面积相对于假体面积的增加百分比。 结果显示在所有 MG 女性中,假体从初始位置移位的比例为 7.94.5%(从 1.5% 到 34.5%)。在 BIM 的矢量中,下外侧的矢量占多数 - 124 个(55.4%)MG,而上外侧的矢量为 53 个(28.6%),P=0.001。下侧 18 个(8.0%)和 150° 上侧 11 个(4.9%)的 BIM 最不常见。在 75 名(67.0%)女性中观察到,假体运动矢量在两个 MG 中对称匹配;在 37 名(33.0%)女性中,两者不同。有 54 名(48.2%)妇女的两个运动组的 BIM 值相同。在其他病例中,右侧乳腺的 BIM 值更大--40 例(35.7%)或左侧乳腺的 BIM 值更大--18 例(16.1%)。聚类分析将植入物移位分为四种程度:第一种--1.5%至6.4%,第二种--6.5%至10.4%,第三种--10.5%至20.0%,第四种>20.0%。 结论使用表面光滑的圆形种植体,SAMP 一年后所有种植体从初始位置的移位率为 7.9±4.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信