Satisfaction with Home Healthcare Provider Service in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Hybrid Closed Loop System: The SATURN Study

H. Hanaire, Nicolas Naiditch, V. Melki, Pierre Morcel, Nelly Puech, Emeric Scharbarg, Raquel Tirado-Godas, Guila Lancman, M. Schaller, Cécile Delval, Lucy Chaillous
{"title":"Satisfaction with Home Healthcare Provider Service in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Hybrid Closed Loop System: The SATURN Study","authors":"H. Hanaire, Nicolas Naiditch, V. Melki, Pierre Morcel, Nelly Puech, Emeric Scharbarg, Raquel Tirado-Godas, Guila Lancman, M. Schaller, Cécile Delval, Lucy Chaillous","doi":"10.33590/emjdiabet/10303508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems have the potential to improve glycaemic control in people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D). In France, patient technical education and assistance for HCL users is provided by trained nurses from home healthcare providers (HHP). The objective of this study was to evaluate satisfaction of people with T1D with HHP services. Methods: In total, 35 participants with T1D and a prescription for an HCL system were studied during 3 months after HCL initiation in two French hospitals. A series of questionnaires were completed by participants. The number of planned (per protocol) and unplanned HHP interactions was monitored. Glycaemic control at inclusion and Day 90 was compared; formal statistical testing was carried out post-hoc. Results: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) with HHP service was high both at Day 30 (mean CSQ-8 score: 28.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.0; 29.9) and at Day 90 (29.0; 95% CI: 27.9; 30.0). Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) score (standard deviation) decreased from 31.2 (±15.7) at inclusion to 23.1 (±16.8) at Day 90. Participants had a median number of four home visits and two phone calls, but important differences were observed between participants: total interactions with HHP nurses ranged between five and 12 contacts, and 45.7% of participants requested unplanned interactions. Glycaemic control improved significantly: mean time in range increased from 57.0% (±13.3) at inclusion to 71.4% (±9.4) at Day 90 (p<0.001). Conclusion: HHP services for early phase HCL implementation were met with high client satisfaction levels. Study results emphasise the need for a personalised HHP approach.","PeriodicalId":418035,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Diabetes","volume":"85 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/10303508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems have the potential to improve glycaemic control in people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D). In France, patient technical education and assistance for HCL users is provided by trained nurses from home healthcare providers (HHP). The objective of this study was to evaluate satisfaction of people with T1D with HHP services. Methods: In total, 35 participants with T1D and a prescription for an HCL system were studied during 3 months after HCL initiation in two French hospitals. A series of questionnaires were completed by participants. The number of planned (per protocol) and unplanned HHP interactions was monitored. Glycaemic control at inclusion and Day 90 was compared; formal statistical testing was carried out post-hoc. Results: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) with HHP service was high both at Day 30 (mean CSQ-8 score: 28.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.0; 29.9) and at Day 90 (29.0; 95% CI: 27.9; 30.0). Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) score (standard deviation) decreased from 31.2 (±15.7) at inclusion to 23.1 (±16.8) at Day 90. Participants had a median number of four home visits and two phone calls, but important differences were observed between participants: total interactions with HHP nurses ranged between five and 12 contacts, and 45.7% of participants requested unplanned interactions. Glycaemic control improved significantly: mean time in range increased from 57.0% (±13.3) at inclusion to 71.4% (±9.4) at Day 90 (p<0.001). Conclusion: HHP services for early phase HCL implementation were met with high client satisfaction levels. Study results emphasise the need for a personalised HHP approach.
使用混合闭环系统的 1 型糖尿病成人患者对家庭医疗服务提供者服务的满意度:SATURN 研究
导言混合闭环(HCL)系统具有改善 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者血糖控制的潜力。 在法国,HCL 用户的患者技术教育和援助由来自家庭保健提供商(HHP)的训练有素的护士提供。本研究旨在评估 T1D 患者对 HHP 服务的满意度。 研究方法在开始使用 HCL 后的 3 个月内,法国两家医院共对 35 名 T1D 患者和 HCL 系统处方患者进行了研究。参与者填写了一系列调查问卷。对计划内(按方案)和计划外的 HHP 互动次数进行了监测。比较了入院时和第 90 天的血糖控制情况;事后进行了正式的统计测试。 结果在第 30 天(CSQ-8 平均得分:28.9;95% 置信区间 [CI]:28.0;29.9)和第 90 天(29.0;95% 置信区间:27.9;30.0),客户对 HHP 服务的满意度均较高。低血糖恐惧调查-II (HFS-II) 评分(标准偏差)从纳入时的 31.2 (±15.7) 降至第 90 天时的 23.1 (±16.8)。 参与者的家访中位数为 4 次,电话中位数为 2 次,但不同参与者之间存在重大差异:与 HHP 护士的总互动次数在 5 到 12 次之间,45.7% 的参与者要求进行计划外互动。 血糖控制情况明显改善:血糖控制在范围内的平均时间从纳入时的 57.0% (±13.3) 增加到第 90 天时的 71.4% (±9.4) (p<0.001)。 结论早期阶段实施的保健计划服务获得了较高的客户满意度。研究结果表明,有必要采用个性化的保健服务方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信