A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR IPO UNDERPERFORMANCE PREDICTION

Pravinkumar Sonsare, Ashtavinayak Pande, Akshay Kurve, Sudhanshu Kumar, Chinmay Shanbhag
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR IPO UNDERPERFORMANCE PREDICTION","authors":"Pravinkumar Sonsare, Ashtavinayak Pande, Akshay Kurve, Sudhanshu Kumar, Chinmay Shanbhag","doi":"10.46947/joaasr562023621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)  are a popular way for companies to raise capital and enter the public markets. However, many IPOs underperform and fail to meet the expectations of investors. In this research paper, we explore the use of different machine learning models, namely AdaBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, ANN and SVM, for predicting IPO underperformance. We collect and pre-process a dataset of IPOs from the past few years, and use it to train and evaluate the performance of each model. Our results show that Artificial Neural Network model is better suited for predicting IPO underperformance. Additionally, our analysis provides insights into the factors that contribute to underperformance and highlights the importance of certain features in predicting IPO performance. Our research provides valuable information for investors and financial analysts interested in predicting the performance of IPOs and mitigating the risks associated with IPO investments. We have tested machine learning models, namely AdaBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, ANN and SVM. After Comparing the accuracy of all the models, we arrived at the conclusion that ANN model performed the best with an accuracy of 68.11%.","PeriodicalId":274343,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ADVANCED APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ADVANCED APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46947/joaasr562023621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)  are a popular way for companies to raise capital and enter the public markets. However, many IPOs underperform and fail to meet the expectations of investors. In this research paper, we explore the use of different machine learning models, namely AdaBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, ANN and SVM, for predicting IPO underperformance. We collect and pre-process a dataset of IPOs from the past few years, and use it to train and evaluate the performance of each model. Our results show that Artificial Neural Network model is better suited for predicting IPO underperformance. Additionally, our analysis provides insights into the factors that contribute to underperformance and highlights the importance of certain features in predicting IPO performance. Our research provides valuable information for investors and financial analysts interested in predicting the performance of IPOs and mitigating the risks associated with IPO investments. We have tested machine learning models, namely AdaBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, ANN and SVM. After Comparing the accuracy of all the models, we arrived at the conclusion that ANN model performed the best with an accuracy of 68.11%.
用于 IPO 业绩不佳预测的机器学习算法比较分析
首次公开募股(IPO)是公司筹集资金和进入公共市场的一种流行方式。然而,许多首次公开募股表现不佳,未能达到投资者的预期。在本研究论文中,我们探索了不同机器学习模型(即 AdaBoost、随机森林、逻辑回归、ANN 和 SVM)在预测 IPO 表现不佳方面的应用。我们收集并预处理了过去几年的 IPO 数据集,并用它来训练和评估每个模型的性能。结果表明,人工神经网络模型更适合预测 IPO 表现不佳。此外,我们的分析深入揭示了导致表现不佳的因素,并强调了某些特征在预测 IPO 表现方面的重要性。我们的研究为有意预测 IPO 表现和降低 IPO 投资相关风险的投资者和金融分析师提供了有价值的信息。我们测试了机器学习模型,即 AdaBoost、Random Forest、Logistic Regression、ANN 和 SVM。在比较了所有模型的准确性后,我们得出结论:ANN 模型的准确性为 68.11%,表现最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信