Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Associated Factors in the Population of the Eye Cohort Study in Southeast Iran

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kourosh Shahraki, Abolfazl Tahkor, Fariba Shahraki Sanavi, Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam, Kiyanoosh Shahraki, M. Mahjoob, Fateme Alipour, Hassan Okati-Aliabad, Mehdi Mohammadi, Reza Malekzade, Hosein Poustchi
{"title":"Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Associated Factors in the Population of the Eye Cohort Study in Southeast Iran","authors":"Kourosh Shahraki, Abolfazl Tahkor, Fariba Shahraki Sanavi, Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam, Kiyanoosh Shahraki, M. Mahjoob, Fateme Alipour, Hassan Okati-Aliabad, Mehdi Mohammadi, Reza Malekzade, Hosein Poustchi","doi":"10.5812/healthscope-137161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The study aims to determine the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of refractive errors and its related factors among the adult population of southeastern Iran. Methods: The current study included 9280 individuals aged 35 to 70 years using a multistage random sample method from October 2015 to January 2019 as a part of a Persian cohort study in Zahedan. Uncorrected and corrected vision, objective noncycloplegic, and subjective refraction were measured, with all participants undergoing ophthalmoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, refraction, and retinoscopy. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 statistic software and described as percentage, odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval. Comparisons between groups and relationships among risk factors and refractive errors were performed with chi-square, nominal, and multiple regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of low and moderate myopia, high myopia, low and moderate hyperopia, high hyperopia, low and moderate astigmatism, and high astigmatism was 24.2 (95% CI: 22.40 - 25.90), 1.5(95% CI: 0.00 - 3.53), 16.1(95% CI: 14.20 - 17.90), 1.3(95% CI: 0.00 - 3.30), 35.6 (95% CI: 33.90 - 37.30), and 3.8 (95% CI: 1.80 - 5.70) percent, respectively. The prevalence of refractive errors significantly varied across different age groups overall and by sex (P = 0.01). The proportion of refractive errors also significantly differed by education (P = < 0.001). The prevalence of against the rule, with the rule, and oblique astigmatism was 32.8 % (95% CI: 31.10 - 34.20), 42.1% (40.50 - 43.60), and 24.9% (23.10 - 26.60), respectively. The risk of astigmatism was significantly lower in men than in women (OR = 0.75; 95 % CI: 0.60 - 0.90). Based on multiple regression, the risk of myopia (OR = 2.07; 95 % CI: 1.60 - 2.60) and hyperopia (OR = 25.38; 95 % CI: 18.70 - 34.3) was higher in the age group 65 to 75 years compared to the younger group. Conclusions: The present study provided valuable information on the prevalence of refractive errors in the adult population in south-eastern Iran. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive eye care services, particularly for older individuals and those with lower education levels. Further prospective research is warranted to explore the factors contributing to refractive errors and to develop effective strategies for its prevention and management.","PeriodicalId":12857,"journal":{"name":"Health Scope","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Scope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-137161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aims to determine the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of refractive errors and its related factors among the adult population of southeastern Iran. Methods: The current study included 9280 individuals aged 35 to 70 years using a multistage random sample method from October 2015 to January 2019 as a part of a Persian cohort study in Zahedan. Uncorrected and corrected vision, objective noncycloplegic, and subjective refraction were measured, with all participants undergoing ophthalmoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundoscopy, refraction, and retinoscopy. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 statistic software and described as percentage, odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval. Comparisons between groups and relationships among risk factors and refractive errors were performed with chi-square, nominal, and multiple regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of low and moderate myopia, high myopia, low and moderate hyperopia, high hyperopia, low and moderate astigmatism, and high astigmatism was 24.2 (95% CI: 22.40 - 25.90), 1.5(95% CI: 0.00 - 3.53), 16.1(95% CI: 14.20 - 17.90), 1.3(95% CI: 0.00 - 3.30), 35.6 (95% CI: 33.90 - 37.30), and 3.8 (95% CI: 1.80 - 5.70) percent, respectively. The prevalence of refractive errors significantly varied across different age groups overall and by sex (P = 0.01). The proportion of refractive errors also significantly differed by education (P = < 0.001). The prevalence of against the rule, with the rule, and oblique astigmatism was 32.8 % (95% CI: 31.10 - 34.20), 42.1% (40.50 - 43.60), and 24.9% (23.10 - 26.60), respectively. The risk of astigmatism was significantly lower in men than in women (OR = 0.75; 95 % CI: 0.60 - 0.90). Based on multiple regression, the risk of myopia (OR = 2.07; 95 % CI: 1.60 - 2.60) and hyperopia (OR = 25.38; 95 % CI: 18.70 - 34.3) was higher in the age group 65 to 75 years compared to the younger group. Conclusions: The present study provided valuable information on the prevalence of refractive errors in the adult population in south-eastern Iran. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive eye care services, particularly for older individuals and those with lower education levels. Further prospective research is warranted to explore the factors contributing to refractive errors and to develop effective strategies for its prevention and management.
伊朗东南部眼科队列研究人群中屈光不正的患病率及相关因素
研究目的本研究旨在确定伊朗东南部成年人口中屈光不正的年龄和性别调整患病率及其相关因素。研究方法作为扎黑丹波斯队列研究的一部分,本研究采用多阶段随机抽样方法,从 2015 年 10 月至 2019 年 1 月期间纳入了 9280 名年龄在 35 岁至 70 岁之间的人。所有参与者都接受了眼底镜检查、裂隙灯生物显微镜检查、眼底镜检查、屈光检查和视网膜镜检查,并测量了未矫正和矫正视力、客观非环视和主观屈光度。数据使用 SPSS 23.0 版统计软件进行分析,并以百分比、几率比例和 95% 置信区间进行描述。组间比较和风险因素与屈光不正之间的关系采用卡方、名义和多元回归分析法。结果低度和中度近视、高度近视、低度和中度远视、高度远视、低度和中度散光以及高度散光的发生率分别为 24.2(95% CI:22.40 - 25.90)、1.5(95% CI:0.00 - 3.53)、16.1(95% CI:14.20 - 17.90)、1.3(95% CI:0.00 - 3.30)、35.6(95% CI:33.90 - 37.30)和 3.8(95% CI:1.80 - 5.70)%。不同年龄组的屈光不正患病率总体上有显著差异,不同性别的患病率也有显著差异(P = 0.01)。屈光不正的比例也因教育程度不同而有显著差异(P = < 0.001)。违反规则、符合规则和斜散光的发生率分别为 32.8% (95% CI: 31.10 - 34.20)、42.1% (40.50 - 43.60) 和 24.9% (23.10 - 26.60)。男性发生散光的风险明显低于女性(OR = 0.75;95 % CI:0.60 - 0.90)。根据多元回归,65 至 75 岁年龄组的近视(OR = 2.07;95 % CI:1.60 - 2.60)和远视(OR = 25.38;95 % CI:18.70 - 34.3)风险高于年轻组。结论本研究提供了有关伊朗东南部成人屈光不正患病率的宝贵信息。研究结果表明,有必要提供全面的眼科保健服务,尤其是针对老年人和教育水平较低的人群。有必要进一步开展前瞻性研究,探讨导致屈光不正的因素,并制定有效的预防和管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Scope
Health Scope PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信