Rise of Bitcoin, Economic Inequality and the Ecology

IF 1.4 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Region Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.18335/region.v10i3.468
Gal Benshushan
{"title":"Rise of Bitcoin, Economic Inequality and the Ecology","authors":"Gal Benshushan","doi":"10.18335/region.v10i3.468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What do we know about the interrelations between economic inequality, ecology and the increased use of Bitcoin? The aim of the paper was to empirically test the relationship between economic and ecological effects related to the increase in Bitcoin’s network hashrate in a selection of countries that have the highest influx of crypto-mining. To test these three types of relationships, I collected a dataset concerning Bitcoin indicators, economic indicators and ecological indicators that were obtained from multiple trustworthy sources: OECD, World Bank, Fred Data, World Inequality Database (WID). Handling the data challenges, I used this unique panel dataset to explore the relationship between Bitcoin’s hashrate and two types of outcomes: (i) economic outcomes (such as the GDP which as we know relates to inequalities through the Kuznets curve) or direct measures of inequality (such as, income inequality (GINI) and the share of people with top 1% of income and 1% of wealth), and (ii) ecological outcomes (such as carbon emissions, carbon footprint and electronic waste). I found that the Bitcoin currency associates with certain redistribution of wealth, but the accumulation of crypto-currency-related wealth itself remains still concentrated in the wealth of the top 1%. Also, there is evidence for certain nonlinearities in the relationships with the ecological degradation, echoing the concept of the Kuznets curve.","PeriodicalId":43340,"journal":{"name":"Region","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v10i3.468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What do we know about the interrelations between economic inequality, ecology and the increased use of Bitcoin? The aim of the paper was to empirically test the relationship between economic and ecological effects related to the increase in Bitcoin’s network hashrate in a selection of countries that have the highest influx of crypto-mining. To test these three types of relationships, I collected a dataset concerning Bitcoin indicators, economic indicators and ecological indicators that were obtained from multiple trustworthy sources: OECD, World Bank, Fred Data, World Inequality Database (WID). Handling the data challenges, I used this unique panel dataset to explore the relationship between Bitcoin’s hashrate and two types of outcomes: (i) economic outcomes (such as the GDP which as we know relates to inequalities through the Kuznets curve) or direct measures of inequality (such as, income inequality (GINI) and the share of people with top 1% of income and 1% of wealth), and (ii) ecological outcomes (such as carbon emissions, carbon footprint and electronic waste). I found that the Bitcoin currency associates with certain redistribution of wealth, but the accumulation of crypto-currency-related wealth itself remains still concentrated in the wealth of the top 1%. Also, there is evidence for certain nonlinearities in the relationships with the ecological degradation, echoing the concept of the Kuznets curve.
比特币的崛起、经济不平等与生态环境
我们对经济不平等、生态和比特币使用增加之间的相互关系了解多少?本文旨在实证检验比特币网络哈希率的增长对经济和生态影响之间的关系。为了测试这三类关系,我收集了一个数据集,涉及比特币指标、经济指标和生态指标,这些数据来自多个值得信赖的来源:经合组织、世界银行、弗雷德数据、世界不平等数据库(WID)。在应对数据挑战的过程中,我使用了这个独特的面板数据集来探索比特币的哈希率与两类结果之间的关系:(i) 经济结果(如国内生产总值,我们知道国内生产总值通过库兹涅茨曲线与不平等相关)或不平等的直接衡量标准(如收入不平等(GINI)以及收入最高的 1%和财富最高的 1%的人口比例);(ii) 生态结果(如碳排放、碳足迹和电子垃圾)。我发现,比特币货币与某些财富再分配有关,但与加密货币相关的财富积累本身仍集中在收入最高的 1%人群的财富中。此外,有证据表明,比特币与生态退化之间存在一定的非线性关系,这与库兹涅茨曲线的概念不谋而合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Region
Region AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: REGION is the journal of ERSA (European Regional Science Association). It publishes original scientific work in Regional Science, Regional Economics, Economic Geography, and related areas. REGION is open access. It is freely available to readers and does not charge submission or publication fees from authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信