Enhancing Traffic Density Detection and Synthesis through Topological Attributes and Generative Methods

Jonayet Miah, Md Sabbirul Haque, Duc M. Cao, Md Abu Sayed
{"title":"Enhancing Traffic Density Detection and Synthesis through Topological Attributes and Generative Methods","authors":"Jonayet Miah, Md Sabbirul Haque, Duc M. Cao, Md Abu Sayed","doi":"10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the utilization of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) within the realm of traffic forecasting, a critical aspect of intelligent transportation systems. The accuracy of traffic predictions is pivotal for various applications, including trip planning, road traffic control, and vehicle routing. The research comprehensively explores three notable GNN architectures—Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), GraphSAGE (Graph Sample and Aggregation), and Gated Graph Neural Networks (GGNNs)—specifically in the context of traffic prediction. Each architecture's methodology is meticulously examined, encompassing layer configurations, activation functions, and hyperparameters. With the primary aim of minimizing prediction errors, the study identifies GGNNs as the most effective choice among the three models. The outcomes, presented in terms of Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), reveal intriguing insights. While GCNs exhibit an RMSE of 9.25 and an MAE of 8.2, GraphSAGE demonstrates improved performance with an RMSE of 8.5 and an MAE of 7.6. Gated Graph Neural Networks (GGNNs) emerge as the leading model, showcasing the lowest RMSE of 9.2 and an impressive MAE of 7.0. However, the study acknowledges the dynamic nature of these results, emphasizing their dependency on factors such as the dataset, graph structure, feature engineering, and hyperparameter tuning.","PeriodicalId":509154,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.4.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the utilization of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) within the realm of traffic forecasting, a critical aspect of intelligent transportation systems. The accuracy of traffic predictions is pivotal for various applications, including trip planning, road traffic control, and vehicle routing. The research comprehensively explores three notable GNN architectures—Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), GraphSAGE (Graph Sample and Aggregation), and Gated Graph Neural Networks (GGNNs)—specifically in the context of traffic prediction. Each architecture's methodology is meticulously examined, encompassing layer configurations, activation functions, and hyperparameters. With the primary aim of minimizing prediction errors, the study identifies GGNNs as the most effective choice among the three models. The outcomes, presented in terms of Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), reveal intriguing insights. While GCNs exhibit an RMSE of 9.25 and an MAE of 8.2, GraphSAGE demonstrates improved performance with an RMSE of 8.5 and an MAE of 7.6. Gated Graph Neural Networks (GGNNs) emerge as the leading model, showcasing the lowest RMSE of 9.2 and an impressive MAE of 7.0. However, the study acknowledges the dynamic nature of these results, emphasizing their dependency on factors such as the dataset, graph structure, feature engineering, and hyperparameter tuning.
通过拓扑属性和生成方法加强交通密度检测和合成
本研究调查了图神经网络(GNN)在交通预测领域的应用,交通预测是智能交通系统的一个重要方面。交通预测的准确性对各种应用至关重要,包括行程规划、道路交通控制和车辆路由选择。本研究全面探讨了三种著名的图神经网络架构--图卷积网络(GCN)、图采样与聚合(GraphSAGE)和门控图神经网络(GGNN)--特别是在交通预测方面。对每种架构的方法都进行了细致的研究,包括层配置、激活函数和超参数。以最小化预测误差为主要目标,研究发现 GGNN 是三种模型中最有效的选择。以均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)表示的结果揭示了耐人寻味的见解。GCN 的 RMSE 为 9.25,MAE 为 8.2,而 GraphSAGE 的 RMSE 为 8.5,MAE 为 7.6,性能有所提高。门控图神经网络 (GGNN) 成为领先模型,其 RMSE 最低,为 9.2,MAE 为 7.0,令人印象深刻。不过,研究承认这些结果是动态的,强调它们取决于数据集、图结构、特征工程和超参数调整等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信