Reema Qayoom, Z. Mumtaz, Faisal Qadir, Abdul Mueed, Ghulam Kubra, Muhammad Mohsin
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Sub-Specialty Selection Among Adult Cardiology Fellows: Does Gender Play a Role?","authors":"Reema Qayoom, Z. Mumtaz, Faisal Qadir, Abdul Mueed, Ghulam Kubra, Muhammad Mohsin","doi":"10.47144/phj.v56isupplement_2.2680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study is aimed to determine the factors that influence the selection of sub-specialty training among adult cardiology FITs and whether this differs by gender. Methodology: A multiple-choice online survey was conducted on 198 cardiology Fellows-in-training (FITs) in Pakistan from January-May 2023 to assess the determinants of their career paths in clinical cardiac electrophysiology, interventional cardiology, cardiac imaging, and critical care. The survey tool was used for data collection. Results: A total of 198 FITs completed the survey; 36% anticipated specializing in interventional cardiology (IC), 28% in Electrophysiology (EP), 12% in critical care (CC), 15% in cardiac imaging (CI) and 9% were unsure. Among IC and CC group, there was male FIT dominance (70% and 54% respectively) and likelihood of getting employment after completing training was most important factor in both sub-specialties (P <0.001) . Among EP and CI group, there was predominance of women FIT (76% and 56% respectively). The most important factor that influenced FITs to pursue EP was a strong interest in the field and female role model (P <0.001), while for CI minimal radiation exposure and flexibility in job were important factors (all P<0.001). Conclusion: Female FITs are less inclined to choose interventional cardiology as future career path because of increased radiation exposure and old-boys club. Conversely there is growing trend for female FITS inclination towards choosing Electrophysiology, this is in contrast to similar study conducted internationally.","PeriodicalId":42273,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Heart Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v56isupplement_2.2680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study is aimed to determine the factors that influence the selection of sub-specialty training among adult cardiology FITs and whether this differs by gender. Methodology: A multiple-choice online survey was conducted on 198 cardiology Fellows-in-training (FITs) in Pakistan from January-May 2023 to assess the determinants of their career paths in clinical cardiac electrophysiology, interventional cardiology, cardiac imaging, and critical care. The survey tool was used for data collection. Results: A total of 198 FITs completed the survey; 36% anticipated specializing in interventional cardiology (IC), 28% in Electrophysiology (EP), 12% in critical care (CC), 15% in cardiac imaging (CI) and 9% were unsure. Among IC and CC group, there was male FIT dominance (70% and 54% respectively) and likelihood of getting employment after completing training was most important factor in both sub-specialties (P <0.001) . Among EP and CI group, there was predominance of women FIT (76% and 56% respectively). The most important factor that influenced FITs to pursue EP was a strong interest in the field and female role model (P <0.001), while for CI minimal radiation exposure and flexibility in job were important factors (all P<0.001). Conclusion: Female FITs are less inclined to choose interventional cardiology as future career path because of increased radiation exposure and old-boys club. Conversely there is growing trend for female FITS inclination towards choosing Electrophysiology, this is in contrast to similar study conducted internationally.
研究目的本研究旨在确定影响成人心脏病学 FIT 人员选择亚专科培训的因素,以及这些因素是否因性别而异。研究方法:在 2023 年 1 月至 5 月期间,对巴基斯坦的 198 名心脏病学培训生(FITs)进行了多项选择在线调查,以评估他们在临床心脏电生理学、介入心脏病学、心脏成像和重症监护方面的职业道路的决定因素。数据收集采用了调查工具。结果:共有 198 名 FIT 完成了调查,其中 36% 预计将专攻介入心脏病学 (IC),28% 专攻电生理学 (EP),12% 专攻重症监护 (CC),15% 专攻心脏成像 (CI),9% 不确定。在 IC 和 CC 组中,男性 FIT 占主导地位(分别为 70% 和 54%),完成培训后就业的可能性是这两个亚专科最重要的因素(P <0.001)。在 EP 和 CI 组中,女性 FIT 占主导地位(分别为 76% 和 56%)。影响 FIT 从事 EP 的最重要因素是对该领域的浓厚兴趣和女性榜样(P<0.001),而对 CI 而言,最小辐射暴露和工作灵活性是重要因素(均 P<0.001)。结论女性 FITs 不太愿意选择介入心脏病学作为未来的职业道路,因为辐射暴露增加和老男孩俱乐部。相反,女性 FITS 越来越倾向于选择电生理学,这与国际上开展的类似研究形成了鲜明对比。