Bioequivalence assessment of two formulations of empagliflozin in healthy adult subjects

Evelyn Pena, Alfredo Inatti, Anyoli Taly, José Gregorio Chacón, Xenon Serrano-Martin
{"title":"Bioequivalence assessment of two formulations of empagliflozin in healthy adult subjects","authors":"Evelyn Pena, Alfredo Inatti, Anyoli Taly, José Gregorio Chacón, Xenon Serrano-Martin","doi":"10.25259/ajpps_2023_019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study was to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) between Izaban® (test) and Jardiance® (reference) empagliflozin 25 mg, oral tablets, in healthy adult subjects. A randomized, open-label, two-sequence, and two-period crossover comparative oral bioavailability study was conducted on healthy adult subjects. It was tested BE in vivo using a comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation. Serial blood samples were collected up to 72 h following oral administration of the study drugs, plasma concentrations of empagliflozin were using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method. The test and reference drug products were considered bioequivalent when the geometric means of the test (T)/reference (R) ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fall within the range of 80.00–125.00%. For PK parameters, % T/R ratios and 90% CIs were Cmax: 105.11% (100.28–110.18%), area under curve (AUC0-t): 103.25% (99.62–107.00%), and AUC0-∞ 102.71% (99.26–106.28%). Our study demonstrated in vivo BE between the two empagliflozin formulations tested in healthy subjects under fasting conditions.","PeriodicalId":376259,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ajpps_2023_019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) between Izaban® (test) and Jardiance® (reference) empagliflozin 25 mg, oral tablets, in healthy adult subjects. A randomized, open-label, two-sequence, and two-period crossover comparative oral bioavailability study was conducted on healthy adult subjects. It was tested BE in vivo using a comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation. Serial blood samples were collected up to 72 h following oral administration of the study drugs, plasma concentrations of empagliflozin were using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method. The test and reference drug products were considered bioequivalent when the geometric means of the test (T)/reference (R) ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fall within the range of 80.00–125.00%. For PK parameters, % T/R ratios and 90% CIs were Cmax: 105.11% (100.28–110.18%), area under curve (AUC0-t): 103.25% (99.62–107.00%), and AUC0-∞ 102.71% (99.26–106.28%). Our study demonstrated in vivo BE between the two empagliflozin formulations tested in healthy subjects under fasting conditions.
对健康成年受试者服用的两种恩格列净制剂进行生物等效性评估
本研究旨在评估健康成年受试者服用伊扎班®(试验药)和Jardiance®(参比药)25毫克恩格列净口服片剂的生物等效性(BE)。 在健康成人受试者中开展了一项随机、开放标签、两序列、两阶段交叉的口服生物利用度比较研究。该研究采用比较药代动力学(PK)评估对 BE 进行了体内测试。研究采用液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS-MS)方法,在口服研究药物72小时后采集血样,测定血浆中恩格列净的浓度。 当试验(T)/参比(R)比值的几何平均数和 90% 置信区间(CIs)在 80.00-125.00% 范围内时,试验药物和参比药物产品被认为具有生物等效性。在 PK 参数方面,T/R 比值的百分比和 90% 置信区间分别为:Cmax:105.11%(100.28-110.18%);曲线下面积(AUC0-t):103.25%(99.62-100.18%);Cmax:105.11%(100.28-110.18%):103.25%(99.62-107.00%)和 AUC0-∞ 102.71%(99.26-106.28%)。 我们的研究表明,在空腹条件下,健康受试者体内测试的两种恩格列净制剂之间具有生物相容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信