{"title":"Breaking Up and the Value of Commitment","authors":"Richard Healey","doi":"10.3998/ergo.4636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While love and personal relationships are the subjects of rich and sophisticated literatures, philosophical writing about the end of special relationships is much harder to come by. However, the end of special relationships is a significant part of our lives and gives rise to a number of philosophical questions. In this article, I explore the normative significance of the end of special relationships, with a particular focus on the case of breaking up in the context of committed romantic relationships. Specifically, I address three questions. First, what does A do when A breaks up with B? Second, what normative effect will A’s breaking up with B have on the relationship-based duties, reasons, and permissions that are partly constitutive of A and B’s relationship? Third, how is the ability to break up consistent with the commitment that many longer-term romantic relationships involve? In response to the first and second questions, I argue that breaking up is a neglected example of a normative power and develop a tripartite account of the normative effects of exercising this power. In response to the third question, I develop an account of the nature and value of commitment within romantic relationships and show how the power to exit a relationship by breaking up is consistent with this form of commitment.","PeriodicalId":504477,"journal":{"name":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.4636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While love and personal relationships are the subjects of rich and sophisticated literatures, philosophical writing about the end of special relationships is much harder to come by. However, the end of special relationships is a significant part of our lives and gives rise to a number of philosophical questions. In this article, I explore the normative significance of the end of special relationships, with a particular focus on the case of breaking up in the context of committed romantic relationships. Specifically, I address three questions. First, what does A do when A breaks up with B? Second, what normative effect will A’s breaking up with B have on the relationship-based duties, reasons, and permissions that are partly constitutive of A and B’s relationship? Third, how is the ability to break up consistent with the commitment that many longer-term romantic relationships involve? In response to the first and second questions, I argue that breaking up is a neglected example of a normative power and develop a tripartite account of the normative effects of exercising this power. In response to the third question, I develop an account of the nature and value of commitment within romantic relationships and show how the power to exit a relationship by breaking up is consistent with this form of commitment.
爱情和人际关系是丰富而复杂的文学作品的主题,而关于特殊关系结束的哲学著作却难得一见。然而,特殊关系的终结是我们生活的一个重要部分,并引发了一系列哲学问题。在本文中,我将探讨特殊关系结束的规范意义,并特别关注在承诺的浪漫关系中分手的案例。具体而言,我将探讨三个问题。第一,当 A 与 B 分手时,A 会怎么做?第二,A 与 B 分手会对部分构成 A 和 B 关系的基于关系的义务、理由和许可产生什么规范性影响?第三,分手的能力与许多长期恋爱关系所涉及的承诺是如何一致的?在回答第一和第二个问题时,我认为分手是规范性权力的一个被忽视的例子,并对行使这种权力的规范性影响进行了三方面的阐述。在回答第三个问题时,我阐述了恋爱关系中承诺的性质和价值,并说明了通过分手退出恋爱关系的权力是如何与这种承诺形式相一致的。