Leaf carbon and nitrogen stoichiometric variation along environmental gradients

Huiying Xu, Han Wang, I. Prentice, S. Harrison
{"title":"Leaf carbon and nitrogen stoichiometric variation along environmental gradients","authors":"Huiying Xu, Han Wang, I. Prentice, S. Harrison","doi":"10.5194/bg-20-4511-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Leaf stoichiometric traits are central to ecosystem function and biogeochemical cycling, yet no accepted theory predicts their variation along environmental gradients. Using data in the China Plant Trait Database version 2, we aimed to characterize variation in leaf carbon and nitrogen per unit mass (Cmass, Nmass) and their ratio and to test an eco-evolutionary optimality model for Nmass. Community-mean trait values were related to climate variables by multiple linear regression. Climatic optima and tolerances of major genera were estimated; Pagel's λ was used to quantify phylogenetic controls, and Bayesian phylogenetic linear mixed models to assess the contributions of climate, species identity, and phylogeny. Optimality-based predictions of community-mean Nmass were compared to observed values. All traits showed strong phylogenetic signals. Climate explained only 18 % of C:N ratio variation among species but 45 % among communities, highlighting the role of taxonomic replacement in mediating community-level responses. Geographic distributions of deciduous taxa were separated primarily by moisture and evergreens by temperature. Cmass increased with irradiance but decreased with moisture and temperature. Nmass declined with all three variables. C:N ratio variations were dominated by Nmass. The coefficients relating Nmass to the ratio of maximum carboxylation capacity at 25 ∘C (Vcmax25) and leaf mass per area (Ma) were influenced by leaf area index. The optimality model captured 68 % and 53 % of variation between communities for Vcmax25 and Ma, respectively, and 21 % for Nmass. We conclude that stoichiometric variations along climate gradients are achieved largely by environmental selection among species and clades with different intraspecific trait values. Variations in leaf C:N ratio are mainly determined by Nmass, and optimality-based modelling shows useful predictive ability for community-mean Nmass. These findings should help to improve the representation of C:N coupling in ecosystem models.","PeriodicalId":502171,"journal":{"name":"Biogeosciences","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4511-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Leaf stoichiometric traits are central to ecosystem function and biogeochemical cycling, yet no accepted theory predicts their variation along environmental gradients. Using data in the China Plant Trait Database version 2, we aimed to characterize variation in leaf carbon and nitrogen per unit mass (Cmass, Nmass) and their ratio and to test an eco-evolutionary optimality model for Nmass. Community-mean trait values were related to climate variables by multiple linear regression. Climatic optima and tolerances of major genera were estimated; Pagel's λ was used to quantify phylogenetic controls, and Bayesian phylogenetic linear mixed models to assess the contributions of climate, species identity, and phylogeny. Optimality-based predictions of community-mean Nmass were compared to observed values. All traits showed strong phylogenetic signals. Climate explained only 18 % of C:N ratio variation among species but 45 % among communities, highlighting the role of taxonomic replacement in mediating community-level responses. Geographic distributions of deciduous taxa were separated primarily by moisture and evergreens by temperature. Cmass increased with irradiance but decreased with moisture and temperature. Nmass declined with all three variables. C:N ratio variations were dominated by Nmass. The coefficients relating Nmass to the ratio of maximum carboxylation capacity at 25 ∘C (Vcmax25) and leaf mass per area (Ma) were influenced by leaf area index. The optimality model captured 68 % and 53 % of variation between communities for Vcmax25 and Ma, respectively, and 21 % for Nmass. We conclude that stoichiometric variations along climate gradients are achieved largely by environmental selection among species and clades with different intraspecific trait values. Variations in leaf C:N ratio are mainly determined by Nmass, and optimality-based modelling shows useful predictive ability for community-mean Nmass. These findings should help to improve the representation of C:N coupling in ecosystem models.
叶片碳和氮的化学计量随环境梯度的变化而变化
摘要叶片的化学计量性状是生态系统功能和生物地球化学循环的核心,但目前还没有公认的理论能预测其在环境梯度上的变化。利用中国植物性状数据库第二版中的数据,我们旨在描述单位质量叶片碳、氮(Cmass、Nmass)及其比值的变化特征,并检验Nmass的生态进化优化模型。通过多元线性回归,将群落平均性状值与气候变量联系起来。对主要种属的最佳气候和耐受性进行了估算;使用 Pagel's λ 对系统发育控制进行了量化,并使用贝叶斯系统发育线性混合模型对气候、物种特征和系统发育的贡献进行了评估。基于最优化的群落平均 Nmass 预测值与观测值进行了比较。所有性状都显示出强烈的系统发育信号。气候只解释了物种间 18% 的碳氮比变化,但却解释了群落间 45% 的碳氮比变化,这突出表明了分类替代在群落水平反应中的中介作用。落叶类群的地理分布主要受湿度影响,而常绿类群则受温度影响。Cmass随辐照度的增加而增加,但随湿度和温度的增加而减少。氮质量则随着所有三个变量的变化而下降。碳氮比的变化主要受氮质量的影响。Nmass 与 25 ∘C 时最大羧化能力(Vcmax25)和单位面积叶片质量(Ma)之比的相关系数受叶面积指数的影响。优化模型分别捕获了群落间 Vcmax25 和 Ma 变异的 68% 和 53%,捕获了 Nmass 变异的 21%。我们的结论是,气候梯度上的化学计量变化主要是通过具有不同种内性状值的物种和支系之间的环境选择实现的。叶片 C:N 比率的变化主要由 Nmass 决定,基于优化的建模显示了对群落平均 Nmass 的有用预测能力。这些发现将有助于改进生态系统模型中对 C:N 耦合的表述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信