Heat Mitigation in the Southeastern United States: Are Cooling Centers Equitable and Strategic?

IF 0.6 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Michael J. Allen, Jennifer L. Whytlaw, Nicole Hutton, Jeremy S. Hoffman
{"title":"Heat Mitigation in the Southeastern United States: Are Cooling Centers Equitable and Strategic?","authors":"Michael J. Allen, Jennifer L. Whytlaw, Nicole Hutton, Jeremy S. Hoffman","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2023.a912266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In the face of anthropogenic climate change, the ability of communities to reduce the heat-health burden remains a significant public health issue. This research is the first to identify cooling centers across the southeastern United States, providing a resource for stakeholders. The study evaluates the spatial relationship of these venues for heat-vulnerable populations. Using a survey and publicly available data, researchers identified 1,433 cooling centers, though significant variability exists across states and local jurisdictions. Of the nine states examined, Tennessee was the only location with a health system–supported cooling center network. Only 36 percent of the Southeast's population lives within a fifteen-minute drive of a cooling center. In most states, less than 10 percent of vulnerable populations (elderly, non-white, below poverty) are within this driveshed. Most cooling centers were found in urban environments, although heat vulnerability is not exclusively a city issue. Further research is needed to strengthen cross-agency collaboration and evaluate the effectiveness of cooling centers in areas of both high and low population density. Some states have integrated heat as part of hazard mitigation plans, but additional research is needed to explore how these plans go beyond hazard identification and strengthen vulnerable communities' ability to mitigate heat risk.","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"3 1","pages":"366 - 385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Geographer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2023.a912266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:In the face of anthropogenic climate change, the ability of communities to reduce the heat-health burden remains a significant public health issue. This research is the first to identify cooling centers across the southeastern United States, providing a resource for stakeholders. The study evaluates the spatial relationship of these venues for heat-vulnerable populations. Using a survey and publicly available data, researchers identified 1,433 cooling centers, though significant variability exists across states and local jurisdictions. Of the nine states examined, Tennessee was the only location with a health system–supported cooling center network. Only 36 percent of the Southeast's population lives within a fifteen-minute drive of a cooling center. In most states, less than 10 percent of vulnerable populations (elderly, non-white, below poverty) are within this driveshed. Most cooling centers were found in urban environments, although heat vulnerability is not exclusively a city issue. Further research is needed to strengthen cross-agency collaboration and evaluate the effectiveness of cooling centers in areas of both high and low population density. Some states have integrated heat as part of hazard mitigation plans, but additional research is needed to explore how these plans go beyond hazard identification and strengthen vulnerable communities' ability to mitigate heat risk.
美国东南部的防暑降温措施:冷却中心是否具有公平性和战略性?
摘要:面对人为气候变化,社区减少高温健康负担的能力仍然是一个重要的公共卫生问题。这项研究首次确定了美国东南部的降温中心,为利益相关者提供了资源。该研究评估了这些场所与易受高温影响人群的空间关系。通过调查和公开数据,研究人员确定了 1,433 个冷却中心,但各州和地方辖区之间存在很大差异。在所调查的九个州中,田纳西州是唯一一个拥有卫生系统支持的降温中心网络的地区。东南部只有 36% 的人口居住在距离冷却中心 15 分钟车程的范围内。在大多数州,只有不到 10% 的弱势群体(老年人、非白人、贫困人口)生活在这个车程范围内。大多数降温中心都位于城市环境中,尽管高温脆弱性并不完全是一个城市问题。需要进一步开展研究,以加强跨机构合作,并评估降温中心在人口密度高和人口密度低地区的有效性。一些州已将防暑降温作为危害缓解计划的一部分,但还需要开展更多研究,探讨这些计划如何超越危害识别,加强脆弱社区缓解高温风险的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Southeastern Geographer is a biannual publication of the Southeastern Division of Association of American Geographers. The journal has published the academic work of geographers and other social and physical scientists since 1961. Peer-reviewed articles and essays are published along with book reviews, organization and conference reports, and commentaries. The journal welcomes manuscripts on any geographical subject as long as it reflects sound scholarship and contains significant contributions to geographical understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信