General anesthesia is an independent predictor for worse maternal outcome in pregnant pulmonary arterial hypertension patients without cardiac shunt but not for those with shunt

Weida Lu, Min Li, Fuqing Ji, H. Feng, Liangyi Qie, Guo Li, Q. Ji, Mingying Ling, Fan Jiang, X. Cui
{"title":"General anesthesia is an independent predictor for worse maternal outcome in pregnant pulmonary arterial hypertension patients without cardiac shunt but not for those with shunt","authors":"Weida Lu, Min Li, Fuqing Ji, H. Feng, Liangyi Qie, Guo Li, Q. Ji, Mingying Ling, Fan Jiang, X. Cui","doi":"10.1097/ec9.0000000000000104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although pregnancy imposes extra risk in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), hemodynamic characteristics vary between PAH patients with and without cardiac shunts. However, previous studies did not take hemodynamic differences in PAH patients into consideration for pregnancy outcome analysis. We aimed to identify predictors for peripartum outcome of PAH patients without/with cardiac shunt. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of PAH gravidae parturiated by cesarean delivery (C-section) from 4 hospitals. Maternal death and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) occurring during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum were defined as composite end points. Risk factors for end points were analyzed separately in patients with and without cardiac shunt. The effect of general anesthesia on MACEs and maternal death was analyzed by Mantel-Haenszel hierarchical analysis considering cardiac shunts. One hundred eighty-one PAH gravidae were included, of whom 85 had PAH without cardiac shunt and 96 with shunt. Patients who met combined end points were 19/85 in those without shunt compared with 23/96 in those with shunt. The mortality rates were 11.8% and 9.4%, respectively. Both World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC) III/IV and general anesthesia were predictors for gravidae without shunt, whereas only WHO-FC III/IV was a predictor for gravidae with shunt. General anesthesia increased the MACE risk (odds ratio, 9.000; 95% confidence interval, 2.628–30.820) and maternal mortality (odds ratio, 11.000; 95% confidence interval, 2.595–46.622; P = 0.039) in patients without cardiac shunt but not in those with shunt during C-section. All PAH gravidae with WHO-FC III/IV are at high risk and should receive intensive care. General anesthesia should be avoided during C-section for PAH gravidae without a cardiac shunt.","PeriodicalId":72895,"journal":{"name":"Emergency and critical care medicine","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ec9.0000000000000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although pregnancy imposes extra risk in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), hemodynamic characteristics vary between PAH patients with and without cardiac shunts. However, previous studies did not take hemodynamic differences in PAH patients into consideration for pregnancy outcome analysis. We aimed to identify predictors for peripartum outcome of PAH patients without/with cardiac shunt. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of PAH gravidae parturiated by cesarean delivery (C-section) from 4 hospitals. Maternal death and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) occurring during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum were defined as composite end points. Risk factors for end points were analyzed separately in patients with and without cardiac shunt. The effect of general anesthesia on MACEs and maternal death was analyzed by Mantel-Haenszel hierarchical analysis considering cardiac shunts. One hundred eighty-one PAH gravidae were included, of whom 85 had PAH without cardiac shunt and 96 with shunt. Patients who met combined end points were 19/85 in those without shunt compared with 23/96 in those with shunt. The mortality rates were 11.8% and 9.4%, respectively. Both World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC) III/IV and general anesthesia were predictors for gravidae without shunt, whereas only WHO-FC III/IV was a predictor for gravidae with shunt. General anesthesia increased the MACE risk (odds ratio, 9.000; 95% confidence interval, 2.628–30.820) and maternal mortality (odds ratio, 11.000; 95% confidence interval, 2.595–46.622; P = 0.039) in patients without cardiac shunt but not in those with shunt during C-section. All PAH gravidae with WHO-FC III/IV are at high risk and should receive intensive care. General anesthesia should be avoided during C-section for PAH gravidae without a cardiac shunt.
全身麻醉是预测无心脏分流的肺动脉高压孕妇预后较差的独立因素,但对有分流的孕妇而言并非如此
虽然妊娠会给肺动脉高压(PAH)患者带来额外的风险,但有心脏分流和没有心脏分流的 PAH 患者的血液动力学特征是不同的。然而,以往的研究在分析妊娠结局时并未考虑 PAH 患者的血液动力学差异。我们的目的是确定无/有心脏分流的 PAH 患者围产期结局的预测因素。 我们回顾性分析了 4 家医院剖宫产 PAH 孕妇的病历。妊娠期或产后6周内发生的产妇死亡和重大心脏不良事件(MACE)被定义为综合终点。分别分析了有心脏分流和无心脏分流患者的终点风险因素。考虑到心脏分流因素,通过曼特尔-海恩泽尔层次分析法分析了全身麻醉对MACE和孕产妇死亡的影响。 共纳入了 181 名 PAH 孕妇,其中 85 名 PAH 孕妇无心脏分流,96 名 PAH 孕妇有心脏分流。达到综合终点的患者中,无分流者为19/85,而有分流者为23/96。死亡率分别为 11.8% 和 9.4%。世界卫生组织功能分级(WHO-FC)III/IV级和全身麻醉都是预测无分流妊娠的因素,而只有WHO-FC III/IV级是预测有分流妊娠的因素。全身麻醉增加了无心脏分流患者的 MACE 风险(几率比为 9.000;95% 置信区间为 2.628-30.820)和产妇死亡率(几率比为 11.000;95% 置信区间为 2.595-46.622;P = 0.039),但不会增加有分流患者的剖腹产风险。 所有 WHO-FC III/IV 级的 PAH 孕妇都属于高危人群,应接受重症监护。没有心脏分流的 PAH 孕妇在剖腹产时应避免全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信