The different worlds of Google – A comparison of search results on conspiracy theories in 12 countries

Gerret von Nordheim, Tina Bettels-Schwabbauer, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw, Paulina Barczyszyn-Madziarz, Halyna Budivska, Philip Di Salvo, Filip Dingerkus, L. Guazina, Kwaku Krobea Asante, Michał Kuś, Sandra Lábová, Antonia Matei, Norbert Merkovity, F. Paulino, László Petrovszki-Oláh, M. Serwornoo, Jonas Valente, A. Wake, Viktória Zakinszky Toma
{"title":"The different worlds of Google – A comparison of search results on conspiracy theories in 12 countries","authors":"Gerret von Nordheim, Tina Bettels-Schwabbauer, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw, Paulina Barczyszyn-Madziarz, Halyna Budivska, Philip Di Salvo, Filip Dingerkus, L. Guazina, Kwaku Krobea Asante, Michał Kuś, Sandra Lábová, Antonia Matei, Norbert Merkovity, F. Paulino, László Petrovszki-Oláh, M. Serwornoo, Jonas Valente, A. Wake, Viktória Zakinszky Toma","doi":"10.1177/13548565231203102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Search engines play an important role in the spread of disinformation and conspiracy theories, accentuating the power of global platform companies such as Google to contribute to the digital (information) divide by providing search results of lesser quality in certain countries. We investigated this phenomenon by asking what kind of results users see when they search for information on eleven popular conspiracy theories (CTs) via Google. We analysed links from Google search results ( N = 1259) in 12 Western and non-Western countries and 10 languages. Overall, users are more likely to encounter neutral or debunking content when using Google to search for prominent CTs. However, for some CTs, strong country differences in the quality of search results emerge, showing clear correlations between categorical inequalities and unequal access to reliable information. In countries where journalists enjoy less freedom, people enjoy fewer democratic rights and are less able to rely on social elites, Google also provides less enlightening content on CTs than in developed and prosperous democracies. The countries thus disadvantaged are precisely those countries where there is a high propensity to believe in CTs according to comparative survey research. However, in countries where a global language is spoken, for example, English or Portuguese, there is no correlation between structural, country-specific factors and the quality of search results. In this sense, structurally disadvantaged countries seem to benefit from belonging to a larger language community.","PeriodicalId":505001,"journal":{"name":"Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies","volume":"178 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231203102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Search engines play an important role in the spread of disinformation and conspiracy theories, accentuating the power of global platform companies such as Google to contribute to the digital (information) divide by providing search results of lesser quality in certain countries. We investigated this phenomenon by asking what kind of results users see when they search for information on eleven popular conspiracy theories (CTs) via Google. We analysed links from Google search results ( N = 1259) in 12 Western and non-Western countries and 10 languages. Overall, users are more likely to encounter neutral or debunking content when using Google to search for prominent CTs. However, for some CTs, strong country differences in the quality of search results emerge, showing clear correlations between categorical inequalities and unequal access to reliable information. In countries where journalists enjoy less freedom, people enjoy fewer democratic rights and are less able to rely on social elites, Google also provides less enlightening content on CTs than in developed and prosperous democracies. The countries thus disadvantaged are precisely those countries where there is a high propensity to believe in CTs according to comparative survey research. However, in countries where a global language is spoken, for example, English or Portuguese, there is no correlation between structural, country-specific factors and the quality of search results. In this sense, structurally disadvantaged countries seem to benefit from belonging to a larger language community.
谷歌的不同世界--12 个国家的阴谋论搜索结果对比
搜索引擎在虚假信息和阴谋论的传播中扮演着重要角色,通过在某些国家提供质量较差的搜索结果,谷歌等全球平台公司加剧了数字(信息)鸿沟。我们通过询问用户通过谷歌搜索十一种流行阴谋论(CT)的信息时会看到什么样的结果来研究这一现象。我们分析了 12 个西方和非西方国家、10 种语言的谷歌搜索结果链接(N = 1259)。总体而言,用户在使用谷歌搜索著名的阴谋论时,更有可能遇到中立或揭穿阴谋论的内容。然而,对于某些负面新闻,各国的搜索结果质量存在很大差异,这表明分类不平等与获取可靠信息的机会不平等之间存在明显的相关性。在记者享有较少自由、人民享有较少民主权利、较难依赖社会精英的国家,谷歌提供的关于反恐的启发性内容也少于发达和繁荣的民主国家。根据比较调查研究,处于不利地位的国家恰恰是那些相信 CT 的倾向性较高的国家。然而,在使用全球语言(如英语或葡萄牙语)的国家,结构性、国别因素与搜索结果质量之间并无关联。从这个意义上说,结构上处于劣势的国家似乎可以从属于一个更大的语言社区中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信