Northern Siberian Trade Route and Polar Urals Railway. Part 2

A. Editorial
{"title":"Northern Siberian Trade Route and Polar Urals Railway. Part 2","authors":"A. Editorial","doi":"10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-3-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reproduced article published in the journal «Zheleznodorozhnoe delo» in 1912 is devoted to a project to build a railway line linking the river network of Siberia (approximately from the current Salekhard to the Ob) with the Arctic coast in Varandey region, where it was supposed to build a seaport.Regardless of the fact that development of the transport infrastructure of the Polar Urals and the North of the European part of Russia eventually went the other way, the economic geography, the foreign trade balance changed, the article is interesting in the historical aspect by the balanced and verified approach to the comprehensive assessment of complex transport projects that was developed more than 110 years ago and their feasibility study. The authors of the project under consideration took into account, when arguing, many factors – of a strategic nature (development of the Siberian region, reduction of the transport load on the backbone transport network of the European part of the country, minimization of competition between domestic producers along the route of goods flows), foreign trade flows, seasonality of navigation along rivers and the Northern Sea Route, technical and economic aspects of construction, distribution of private and public investments, projected optimal tariffs and taxation, payback periods, taking into account payment of dividends, and many others.Of course, the content of factors taken into account and assessment methods have changed significantly since then. One of the paradoxes is that, despite new technologies, modern engineers already assess the risks and difficulties of building in the subpolar zone much higher, which at the beginning of the last century was considered almost an easy and cheaper option for building a railway.In general, we must give credit to the authors for complexity of their approaches, taking into account the time when they were made.","PeriodicalId":121504,"journal":{"name":"World of Transport and Transportation","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of Transport and Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-3-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A reproduced article published in the journal «Zheleznodorozhnoe delo» in 1912 is devoted to a project to build a railway line linking the river network of Siberia (approximately from the current Salekhard to the Ob) with the Arctic coast in Varandey region, where it was supposed to build a seaport.Regardless of the fact that development of the transport infrastructure of the Polar Urals and the North of the European part of Russia eventually went the other way, the economic geography, the foreign trade balance changed, the article is interesting in the historical aspect by the balanced and verified approach to the comprehensive assessment of complex transport projects that was developed more than 110 years ago and their feasibility study. The authors of the project under consideration took into account, when arguing, many factors – of a strategic nature (development of the Siberian region, reduction of the transport load on the backbone transport network of the European part of the country, minimization of competition between domestic producers along the route of goods flows), foreign trade flows, seasonality of navigation along rivers and the Northern Sea Route, technical and economic aspects of construction, distribution of private and public investments, projected optimal tariffs and taxation, payback periods, taking into account payment of dividends, and many others.Of course, the content of factors taken into account and assessment methods have changed significantly since then. One of the paradoxes is that, despite new technologies, modern engineers already assess the risks and difficulties of building in the subpolar zone much higher, which at the beginning of the last century was considered almost an easy and cheaper option for building a railway.In general, we must give credit to the authors for complexity of their approaches, taking into account the time when they were made.
北西伯利亚贸易路线和极地乌拉尔铁路。第二部分
1912 年发表在《热列兹诺多罗日刊》上的一篇转载文章专门介绍了修建一条连接西伯利亚河网(大约从现在的萨列哈尔德河到鄂毕河)与瓦兰迪地区北冰洋沿岸的铁路线的计划,该计划本应在那里修建一个海港。尽管极地乌拉尔和俄罗斯欧洲北部的交通基础设施的发展最终走向了另一个方向,经济地理和外贸平衡也发生了变化,但这篇文章在历史方面的意义在于,它以平衡和经过验证的方式对 110 多年前制定的复杂交通项目进行了全面评估,并对其进行了可行性研究。该项目作者在论证时考虑了许多因素--战略性质的因素(西伯利亚地区的发展、减轻欧洲地区骨干运输网络的运输负荷、最大限度地减少货物流动沿线国内生产商之间的竞争)、外贸流量、河流和北方海路沿线航行的季节性、建设的技术和经济方面、私人和公共投资的分配、预计的最佳关税和税收、投资回收期、考虑到红利的支付等等。当然,从那时起,考虑因素的内容和评估方法都发生了很大变化。其中一个悖论是,尽管有了新技术,但现代工程师对在次极地地区修建铁路的风险和困难的评估已经高出很多,而在上世纪初,修建铁路几乎被认为是一个简单而便宜的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信