To Study the Efficacy of Intraamniotic Prostaglandin F2 Alpha versus Mifepristone and Misoprostol Combination for Mid-trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Admiral Anupam NM Kapur, V. S. J. Rao, M. K. Tangri, Reema Kumar Bhatt, Hrishikesh Magdum
{"title":"To Study the Efficacy of Intraamniotic Prostaglandin F2 Alpha versus Mifepristone and Misoprostol Combination for Mid-trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy","authors":"Admiral Anupam NM Kapur, V. S. J. Rao, M. K. Tangri, Reema Kumar Bhatt, Hrishikesh Magdum","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_78_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aims to compare the effectiveness, induction to abortion interval, blood loss, and side effect profile between administration of intraamniotic prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2a) with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy in mid-trimester. Prospective observational study. The study was conducted by dividing the women with indicated mid-trimester abortions into two groups of 20 women each. Group-I received Tablet Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day 1 and then after 48 h, Tablet Misoprostol 400 mg given per vaginally every 4 h till abortion was completed or a maximum of 5 doses whichever was earlier. Group-II received a single injection of PGF2a (250 mg) intra-amniotically under ultrasonography guidance. Group comparisons were made using t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test for normally/nonnormally distributed continuous data, respectively, and Chi-square test for categorical variables. SPSS version 23 was used for analysis. P < 0.05 was taken as the cut-off for statistical significance. The success rate was 100% in both the groups. There was a significant difference in the mean induction to abortion interval between Group-I, the mean being 12.92 ± 2.68 h compared to Group-II being 33.08 ± 6.35 h (P < 0.001). Group-I had a mean blood loss of 221 ± 55.15 mL, significantly more than Group-II 160 ± 25.13 mL (P < 0.001). Twenty-five percent of the Group-I woman had retained products of conception with none in Group-II (P = 0.029). The pain score was better in Group II (pain score 4.4 vs. 5.7, P < 0.001). Fewer women developed chills in Group II compared to Group I (0% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). PGF2a is equally effective as a combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol in mid-trimester abortion. Although it has a longer induction to abortion interval, it appears to be better with respect to the completeness of evacuation, lesser blood loss, and better patient tolerance.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":"59 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_78_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to compare the effectiveness, induction to abortion interval, blood loss, and side effect profile between administration of intraamniotic prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2a) with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy in mid-trimester. Prospective observational study. The study was conducted by dividing the women with indicated mid-trimester abortions into two groups of 20 women each. Group-I received Tablet Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day 1 and then after 48 h, Tablet Misoprostol 400 mg given per vaginally every 4 h till abortion was completed or a maximum of 5 doses whichever was earlier. Group-II received a single injection of PGF2a (250 mg) intra-amniotically under ultrasonography guidance. Group comparisons were made using t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test for normally/nonnormally distributed continuous data, respectively, and Chi-square test for categorical variables. SPSS version 23 was used for analysis. P < 0.05 was taken as the cut-off for statistical significance. The success rate was 100% in both the groups. There was a significant difference in the mean induction to abortion interval between Group-I, the mean being 12.92 ± 2.68 h compared to Group-II being 33.08 ± 6.35 h (P < 0.001). Group-I had a mean blood loss of 221 ± 55.15 mL, significantly more than Group-II 160 ± 25.13 mL (P < 0.001). Twenty-five percent of the Group-I woman had retained products of conception with none in Group-II (P = 0.029). The pain score was better in Group II (pain score 4.4 vs. 5.7, P < 0.001). Fewer women developed chills in Group II compared to Group I (0% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). PGF2a is equally effective as a combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol in mid-trimester abortion. Although it has a longer induction to abortion interval, it appears to be better with respect to the completeness of evacuation, lesser blood loss, and better patient tolerance.
研究羊膜腔内前列腺素 F2 Alpha 与米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用于中期妊娠医学终止的有效性
目的:本研究旨在比较羊膜腔内注射前列腺素 F2 alpha(PGF2a)与米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用于妊娠中期药物终止妊娠的有效性、从引产到流产的间隔时间、失血量和副作用情况。前瞻性观察研究。 研究将有指征的中期妊娠流产妇女分为两组,每组 20 人。第一组在第 1 天口服米非司酮片 200 毫克,48 小时后每 4 小时阴道注射米索前列醇片 400 毫克,直至流产完成或最多注射 5 次,以时间在前者为准。第二组在超声波引导下,在羊膜腔内注射一次 PGF2a(250 毫克)。对正态/非正态分布的连续数据分别采用 t 检验/曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行分组比较,对分类变量采用卡方检验。分析采用 SPSS 23 版本。统计显著性以 P < 0.05 为界限。 两组的成功率均为 100%。第一组从引产到流产的平均间隔时间为(12.92 ± 2.68)小时,第二组为(33.08 ± 6.35)小时(P < 0.001)。第一组的平均失血量为 221 ± 55.15 毫升,明显高于第二组的 160 ± 25.13 毫升(P < 0.001)。25% 的 I 组妇女有受孕产物残留,而 II 组没有(P = 0.029)。第二组的疼痛评分较好(疼痛评分 4.4 对 5.7,P < 0.001)。与第一组相比,第二组中出现寒颤的女性更少(0% 对 50%,P < 0.001)。 在中期妊娠流产中,PGF2a 与米非司酮和米索前列醇联合用药同样有效。虽然PGF2a从诱导到流产的时间间隔较长,但在排空完整性、失血量和患者耐受性方面似乎更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信