Joint statement by CETAF, SPNHC and BHL on DATA within scientific publications: clarification of [non]copyrightability

Laurence Bénichou, D. Agosti, W. Egloff, Elisa Hermann, Mariko Kageyama, Patricia Mergen, Constance Rinaldo, J. Buschbom
{"title":"Joint statement by CETAF, SPNHC and BHL on DATA within scientific publications: clarification of [non]copyrightability","authors":"Laurence Bénichou, D. Agosti, W. Egloff, Elisa Hermann, Mariko Kageyama, Patricia Mergen, Constance Rinaldo, J. Buschbom","doi":"10.3897/rio.9.e115466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The EU and other states have made legislative efforts to clarify data mining in copyrightable works, but the situation remains obscure and confusing, especially in a globalised field where international legislation can contribute to opacity. The present paper aims at asserting a common position of three communities representing biodiversity sciences and data specialists on this issue and to propose common and best practice guidelines so that they become universally accepted rules. As scientific data users, we take the standpoint that scientific data are not copyrightable and, furthermore, they can be accessed, shared and reused freely. Thus, once legal access has been gained to copyrighted publications, the data within those scholarly publications can be considered to be open data that is freely extractable. This set of recommendations has been reached specifically for scientific use and societal benefits.","PeriodicalId":92718,"journal":{"name":"Research ideas and outcomes","volume":"130 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research ideas and outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e115466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The EU and other states have made legislative efforts to clarify data mining in copyrightable works, but the situation remains obscure and confusing, especially in a globalised field where international legislation can contribute to opacity. The present paper aims at asserting a common position of three communities representing biodiversity sciences and data specialists on this issue and to propose common and best practice guidelines so that they become universally accepted rules. As scientific data users, we take the standpoint that scientific data are not copyrightable and, furthermore, they can be accessed, shared and reused freely. Thus, once legal access has been gained to copyrighted publications, the data within those scholarly publications can be considered to be open data that is freely extractable. This set of recommendations has been reached specifically for scientific use and societal benefits.
CETAF、SPNHC 和 BHL 关于科学出版物中的数据的联合声明:澄清[非]版权性
欧盟和其他国家在立法方面做出了努力,以澄清版权作品中的数据挖掘,但情况仍然模糊不清,尤其是在一个全球化的领域,国际立法可能会造成不透明。本文旨在就这一问题表明代表生物多样性科学和数据专家的三个群体的共同立场,并提出共同的最佳实践准则,使其成为普遍接受的规则。 作为科学数据的使用者,我们认为科学数据没有版权,而且可以自由获取、共享和重复使用。因此,一旦合法获取了受版权保护的出版物,这些学术出版物中的数据就可以被视为可自由提取的开放数据。这套建议是专门为科学使用和社会效益而提出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信