Feature Selection on Grouping Students Into Lab Specializations for the Final Project Using Fuzzy C-Means

Indradi Rahmatullah, Gibran Satya Nugraha, Arik Aranta
{"title":"Feature Selection on Grouping Students Into Lab Specializations for the Final Project Using Fuzzy C-Means","authors":"Indradi Rahmatullah, Gibran Satya Nugraha, Arik Aranta","doi":"10.30812/matrik.v23i1.3341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The student’s Final Project is critical as a requirement to graduate from the University. In the PSTI at Mataram University, each student is required to choose a specialization lab to focus on the final project topic that they will work on. From the questionnaire, 57.7% of students answered that it is difficult to select a lab, and others answered that they prefer to determine the labs based on the grades of the courses that represent each lab. This research aimed to group and analyze students in the final project specialization lab by using the main method, namely Fuzzy C-Means (FCM). The methods used were FCM for clustering, Silhouette Coefficient for analysis of cluster quality results, Pearson Correlation, and Principal Component Analysis for the feature selection processing. The results of this study showed that the FCM method followed by a method for feature selection has better results than previous studies that used the K-Means method without feature selection; with this research result using 131 data, the cluster validation result is 0.501, after feature selection using Pearson correlation is 0.534. Thus, Fuzzy C-Means followed by the right feature selection method can group students into specialization laboratories with good results and can be further developed.","PeriodicalId":364657,"journal":{"name":"MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer","volume":"89 3-4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v23i1.3341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The student’s Final Project is critical as a requirement to graduate from the University. In the PSTI at Mataram University, each student is required to choose a specialization lab to focus on the final project topic that they will work on. From the questionnaire, 57.7% of students answered that it is difficult to select a lab, and others answered that they prefer to determine the labs based on the grades of the courses that represent each lab. This research aimed to group and analyze students in the final project specialization lab by using the main method, namely Fuzzy C-Means (FCM). The methods used were FCM for clustering, Silhouette Coefficient for analysis of cluster quality results, Pearson Correlation, and Principal Component Analysis for the feature selection processing. The results of this study showed that the FCM method followed by a method for feature selection has better results than previous studies that used the K-Means method without feature selection; with this research result using 131 data, the cluster validation result is 0.501, after feature selection using Pearson correlation is 0.534. Thus, Fuzzy C-Means followed by the right feature selection method can group students into specialization laboratories with good results and can be further developed.
使用模糊 C-Means 对学生进行毕业设计实验室专业分组的特征选择
学生的毕业设计是大学毕业的关键要求。在马打兰大学的 PSTI 中,每个学生都必须选择一个专业实验室,重点研究他们要完成的毕业设计课题。在问卷调查中,57.7%的学生回答说很难选择实验室,还有一些学生回答说他们更愿意根据代表每个实验室的课程的成绩来确定实验室。本研究旨在通过使用主要方法,即模糊 C-Means(FCM),对毕业设计专业实验室的学生进行分组和分析。使用的方法包括用于聚类的 FCM、用于聚类质量结果分析的 Silhouette Coefficient、用于特征选择处理的 Pearson Correlation 和 Principal Component Analysis。研究结果表明,与以往使用 K-Means 方法而不进行特征选择的研究相比,使用 FCM 方法后再进行特征选择的结果更好;在使用 131 个数据的研究结果中,聚类验证结果为 0.501,使用皮尔逊相关性进行特征选择后的聚类验证结果为 0.534。因此,采用正确的特征选择方法的模糊 C-Means 可以将学生分组到专业实验室,并取得良好的效果,可以进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信