Safeguarding trust in a digital ecosystem

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Marcos Aguiar, Jeff Kiderman, Harsha Chandra Shekar, Oliver Schilke
{"title":"Safeguarding trust in a digital ecosystem","authors":"Marcos Aguiar, Jeff Kiderman, Harsha Chandra Shekar, Oliver Schilke","doi":"10.1108/jbs-08-2023-0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the significance of safeguards in digital ecosystems and their role in generating trust among participants. This paper argues that the right mix and number of safeguards are crucial for an ecosystem’s growth and success. It offers ecosystem orchestrators concrete guidelines for how to implement and monitor safeguards. Design/methodology/approach This research is based on both consulting experience and publicly available information on several digital ecosystems. Findings This research conceptualizes safeguards as precautionary mechanisms that mandate or promote desirable behavior in an effort to engender trust among ecosystem participants. Safeguards can take various forms, including passwords, escrow, user privacy controls, ratings and reviews and policies and contracts. Striking the right balance of safeguards – neither too few nor too many – is crucial for ecosystem orchestrators. This paper identifies the factors that determine the optimal mix of safeguards, including the power asymmetry between sellers and buyers, the sophistication of participants, the nature of transactions, the cost of negative outcomes and the cost-benefit tradeoff. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to illuminate the relationship between safeguards and trust in the context of digital ecosystem. It is also one of the few attempts to provide managerial guidance for ecosystem designers trying to structure their platform for trust.","PeriodicalId":55881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Strategy","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-08-2023-0157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the significance of safeguards in digital ecosystems and their role in generating trust among participants. This paper argues that the right mix and number of safeguards are crucial for an ecosystem’s growth and success. It offers ecosystem orchestrators concrete guidelines for how to implement and monitor safeguards. Design/methodology/approach This research is based on both consulting experience and publicly available information on several digital ecosystems. Findings This research conceptualizes safeguards as precautionary mechanisms that mandate or promote desirable behavior in an effort to engender trust among ecosystem participants. Safeguards can take various forms, including passwords, escrow, user privacy controls, ratings and reviews and policies and contracts. Striking the right balance of safeguards – neither too few nor too many – is crucial for ecosystem orchestrators. This paper identifies the factors that determine the optimal mix of safeguards, including the power asymmetry between sellers and buyers, the sophistication of participants, the nature of transactions, the cost of negative outcomes and the cost-benefit tradeoff. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to illuminate the relationship between safeguards and trust in the context of digital ecosystem. It is also one of the few attempts to provide managerial guidance for ecosystem designers trying to structure their platform for trust.
在数字生态系统中维护信任
目的 本文旨在阐述保障措施在数字生态系统中的意义及其在参与者之间产生信任的作用。本文认为,适当的保障措施组合和数量对于生态系统的发展和成功至关重要。本文为生态系统协调者提供了如何实施和监控保障措施的具体指导。 设计/方法/途径 本研究基于咨询经验和几个数字生态系统的公开信息。 研究结果 本研究将保障措施概念化为预防机制,强制或促进理想行为,以努力在生态系统参与者之间建立信任。保障措施有多种形式,包括密码、托管、用户隐私控制、评级和评论以及政策和合同。对于生态系统协调者来说,在保障措施之间取得适当的平衡(既不能太少,也不能太多)至关重要。本文指出了决定保障措施最佳组合的因素,包括卖方和买方之间的权力不对称、参与者的复杂程度、交易性质、负面结果的成本以及成本效益权衡。 独创性/价值 据作者所知,本研究是最早阐明数字生态系统中保障措施与信任之间关系的研究之一。这也是为数不多的为生态系统设计者提供管理指导的尝试之一,这些设计者试图构建他们的信任平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Business Strategy
Journal of Business Strategy Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Strategy publishes articles with a practical focus designed to help readers develop successful business strategies. Articles should say something new or different and may propose a unique perspective. They should not offer prescriptions to CEOs on how to manage, but rather be directed toward middle and senior managers at companies of all sizes and types, as well as consultants and academics who want to think about their businesses in new ways. Coverage: As one of the few journals dedicated to business strategy, JBS defines strategy in the broadest sense and thus covers topics as diverse as marketing strategy, innovation, developments in the global economy, mergers & acquisition integration and human resources. We have a penchant for substantive, provocative and well-written articles. We also like to break the mould and include articles on topics readers are unlikely to find in other business publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信