Comparison of volume and centroid uncertainty of a cylindrical segment by two different methods

Q3 Engineering
Ronan Alves da Paixão, André Melo Carvalhais Dutra, E. C. de Oliveira
{"title":"Comparison of volume and centroid uncertainty of a cylindrical segment by two different methods","authors":"Ronan Alves da Paixão, André Melo Carvalhais Dutra, E. C. de Oliveira","doi":"10.21014/actaimeko.v12i4.1302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some solids are seldom studied analytically, unlike spheres, cylinders, and parallelepipeds. When researchers are interested in them, approximations by discretised meshes and numerical calculations are proposed. One of those is the cylindrical segment, which has applications in novel tilt-based industrial hydrometers. More specifically, the cylindrical segment has two means of being characterized: by measuring the radius, the middle height, and the cutting angle; and by measuring the radius and both the minimum height and the maximum height. In this study, one equation from the literature about the cylindrical segment is corrected, and the two measurement forms are compared, along with their impact on the uncertainty of the volume and barycenter of this solid. Particular results depend on specific input uncertainties, measurements, and objectives. Still, for most cases, it turned out that measuring the minimum and maximum heights generally provides lower uncertainty values for the evaluated calculations, especially the centroids.","PeriodicalId":37987,"journal":{"name":"Acta IMEKO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta IMEKO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v12i4.1302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some solids are seldom studied analytically, unlike spheres, cylinders, and parallelepipeds. When researchers are interested in them, approximations by discretised meshes and numerical calculations are proposed. One of those is the cylindrical segment, which has applications in novel tilt-based industrial hydrometers. More specifically, the cylindrical segment has two means of being characterized: by measuring the radius, the middle height, and the cutting angle; and by measuring the radius and both the minimum height and the maximum height. In this study, one equation from the literature about the cylindrical segment is corrected, and the two measurement forms are compared, along with their impact on the uncertainty of the volume and barycenter of this solid. Particular results depend on specific input uncertainties, measurements, and objectives. Still, for most cases, it turned out that measuring the minimum and maximum heights generally provides lower uncertainty values for the evaluated calculations, especially the centroids.
用两种不同方法比较圆柱段的体积和中心点不确定性
与球体、圆柱体和平行六面体不同,有些固体很少进行分析研究。当研究人员对它们感兴趣时,就会提出通过离散网格和数值计算来逼近它们。圆柱段就是其中之一,可应用于新型倾斜式工业比重计。更具体地说,圆柱段有两种表征方法:一种是测量半径、中间高度和切角;另一种是测量半径、最小高度和最大高度。在本研究中,对文献中有关圆柱段的一个方程进行了修正,并比较了两种测量形式,以及它们对该实体的体积和方心不确定度的影响。具体结果取决于特定的输入不确定性、测量和目标。不过,在大多数情况下,测量最小高度和最大高度通常能为评估计算提供较低的不确定度值,尤其是中心点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta IMEKO
Acta IMEKO Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The main goal of this journal is the enhancement of academic activities of IMEKO and a wider dissemination of scientific output from IMEKO TC events. High-quality papers presented at IMEKO conferences, workshops or congresses are seleted by the event organizers and the authors are invited to publish an enhanced version of their paper in this journal. The journal also publishes scientific articles on measurement and instrumentation not related to an IMEKO event.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信