Investigation of Views and Experiences of Medical Interns on the Facilitating and Inhibiting Factors Affecting the Quality of Education in the Clinical Education System

Ghaedamini H, Farahbakhsh S, Amirbeigi Ar, Ghaedamini Ar, Saghafi Z, Ghaedamini Am, Daneshi S
{"title":"Investigation of Views and Experiences of Medical Interns on the Facilitating and Inhibiting Factors Affecting the Quality of Education in the Clinical Education System","authors":"Ghaedamini H, Farahbakhsh S, Amirbeigi Ar, Ghaedamini Ar, Saghafi Z, Ghaedamini Am, Daneshi S","doi":"10.18502/jmed.v18i3.14123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Clinical education is the most important part of medical education that provides a golden opportunity for medical students to combine their theoretical mix with the clinical environment, and this is important in the countries of the style of the arena of medicine Special attention is paid. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine the views and experiences of medical students as facilitators and inhibitors of clinical education quality. Methods: This is qualitative research and a phenomenological approach was used. The study population consisted of medical students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Target-based sampling was performed on 40 medical students. The method for collecting information was a deep interview with the participants. The data were analyzed by the Colaizzi method. Results: Two initial codes were extracted in the form of two main themes (facilitating and inhibiting factors) and 10 sub-themes including providing motivational patterns and creating interest in interns, the high scientific and educational level of attending professors, use of technology, authorizing more responsibility, inappropriate treatment, inappropriate educational planning, inappropriate evaluation method, low-quality mornings, lack of facilities, and overwhelming of some wards were classified. Conclusion: Considering these factors, it is possible to raise the quality of clinical education to the highest possible level and educate responsible and responsible physicians for generations.","PeriodicalId":30509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","volume":"20 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmed.v18i3.14123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical education is the most important part of medical education that provides a golden opportunity for medical students to combine their theoretical mix with the clinical environment, and this is important in the countries of the style of the arena of medicine Special attention is paid. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine the views and experiences of medical students as facilitators and inhibitors of clinical education quality. Methods: This is qualitative research and a phenomenological approach was used. The study population consisted of medical students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Target-based sampling was performed on 40 medical students. The method for collecting information was a deep interview with the participants. The data were analyzed by the Colaizzi method. Results: Two initial codes were extracted in the form of two main themes (facilitating and inhibiting factors) and 10 sub-themes including providing motivational patterns and creating interest in interns, the high scientific and educational level of attending professors, use of technology, authorizing more responsibility, inappropriate treatment, inappropriate educational planning, inappropriate evaluation method, low-quality mornings, lack of facilities, and overwhelming of some wards were classified. Conclusion: Considering these factors, it is possible to raise the quality of clinical education to the highest possible level and educate responsible and responsible physicians for generations.
调查医学实习生对影响临床教育系统教育质量的促进和抑制因素的看法和经验
导言:临床教育是医学教育中最重要的部分,它为医学生提供了一个将理论结合临床环境的黄金机会,这一点在医学舞台风格的国家非常重要。因此,本研究旨在探讨医学生对临床教育质量的促进因素和抑制因素的看法和经验。 研究方法:本研究为定性研究,采用现象学方法。研究对象包括克尔曼医科大学的医学生。对 40 名医学生进行了目标抽样。收集信息的方法是对参与者进行深度访谈。采用科莱兹方法对数据进行分析。 结果:以两个主主题(促进因素和抑制因素)的形式提取了两个初始代码,并对 10 个子主题进行了分类,包括提供激励模式和激发实习生的兴趣、主讲教授的科学和教育水平高、使用技术、授权更多责任、不恰当的治疗、不恰当的教育规划、不恰当的评估方法、低质量的早晨、缺乏设施以及某些病房不堪重负。 结论考虑到这些因素,有可能将临床教育的质量提高到尽可能高的水平,培养出一代又一代有责任感和担当的医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信