Comparative evaluation of disinfectant efficacy against biofilm-residing microorganisms

Lyudmila S. Fedorova, Anastasia V. Ilyakova
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of disinfectant efficacy against biofilm-residing microorganisms","authors":"Lyudmila S. Fedorova, Anastasia V. Ilyakova","doi":"10.36233/0372-9311-422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Bacteria in biofilms (BFs) have increased resistance to antibacterial agents, including disinfectants; however, the efficacy level varies depending on the chosen treatment. Therefore, evaluation of efficacy of main disinfectants against BF-residing microorganisms is of scientific and practical interest. The purpose of the study was to explore the effect of disinfectants from various chemical groups on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria residing in BFs. Materials and methods. The effect of the following disinfectants has been evaluated: alkyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride (ADBAC), tertiary amine (TA), polyhexamethylene guanidine chloride (PHMG), hydrogen peroxide (HP), chloramine (CA), dichloroisocyanuric acid sodium salt (Na DCC), sodium hypochlorite (HC), ethyl alcohol (EA), glutaraldehyde (GA)) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538-P BFs. BFs were grown in 96-well plates at 37ºC for 24 hours and then exposed to biocide solutions. The efficacy of disinfectants was evaluated by the number of remaining viable cells and BF relative density. Results. The analyzed bacterial strains formed moderate BFs; the average number of viable cells in BFs was 6.51 ± 0.19 lg. The viable bacterial cell counts in BFs reduced by more than 4 lg when exposed to HP solutions at a concentration of 6%, Na DCC solution — 0.1% (by active chlorine), HC — 1% (by active chlorine), CA – 1% (by product), PHMG — 0.05%, TA — 1.0 %. The BF density decreased by more than 70%. ADBAC solutions at concentrations of 0.1–1.0%, TA — 0.05%, HP — 3%, Na DCC solution — 0.05% (by active chlorine) caused a 2-lg reduction in viable cell counts in BFs. The efficacy of chlorine-active compounds and HP increased when 0.5% sulfonol was added. GA (0.25–1.00%) and EA (40–70%) solutions were ineffective against BF microorganisms. Conclusion. A promising potential in combating microbial biofilms is demonstrated by disinfectants from the group of oxidizing agents (chlorine-active and oxygen-containing), TA and PHMG; using ADBAC as an individual compound is ineffective; aldehydes and alcohols are unable to destroy BFs and eliminate microorganisms in them.","PeriodicalId":508236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiology, epidemiology and immunobiology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiology, epidemiology and immunobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36233/0372-9311-422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Bacteria in biofilms (BFs) have increased resistance to antibacterial agents, including disinfectants; however, the efficacy level varies depending on the chosen treatment. Therefore, evaluation of efficacy of main disinfectants against BF-residing microorganisms is of scientific and practical interest. The purpose of the study was to explore the effect of disinfectants from various chemical groups on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria residing in BFs. Materials and methods. The effect of the following disinfectants has been evaluated: alkyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride (ADBAC), tertiary amine (TA), polyhexamethylene guanidine chloride (PHMG), hydrogen peroxide (HP), chloramine (CA), dichloroisocyanuric acid sodium salt (Na DCC), sodium hypochlorite (HC), ethyl alcohol (EA), glutaraldehyde (GA)) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538-P BFs. BFs were grown in 96-well plates at 37ºC for 24 hours and then exposed to biocide solutions. The efficacy of disinfectants was evaluated by the number of remaining viable cells and BF relative density. Results. The analyzed bacterial strains formed moderate BFs; the average number of viable cells in BFs was 6.51 ± 0.19 lg. The viable bacterial cell counts in BFs reduced by more than 4 lg when exposed to HP solutions at a concentration of 6%, Na DCC solution — 0.1% (by active chlorine), HC — 1% (by active chlorine), CA – 1% (by product), PHMG — 0.05%, TA — 1.0 %. The BF density decreased by more than 70%. ADBAC solutions at concentrations of 0.1–1.0%, TA — 0.05%, HP — 3%, Na DCC solution — 0.05% (by active chlorine) caused a 2-lg reduction in viable cell counts in BFs. The efficacy of chlorine-active compounds and HP increased when 0.5% sulfonol was added. GA (0.25–1.00%) and EA (40–70%) solutions were ineffective against BF microorganisms. Conclusion. A promising potential in combating microbial biofilms is demonstrated by disinfectants from the group of oxidizing agents (chlorine-active and oxygen-containing), TA and PHMG; using ADBAC as an individual compound is ineffective; aldehydes and alcohols are unable to destroy BFs and eliminate microorganisms in them.
比较评估消毒剂对寄居生物膜微生物的功效
导言。生物膜(BF)中的细菌对包括消毒剂在内的抗菌剂的耐药性越来越强;然而,根据所选治疗方法的不同,药效水平也不尽相同。因此,评估主要消毒剂对寄居在生物膜中的微生物的疗效具有科学和实际意义。 本研究的目的是探讨不同化学组的消毒剂对生物处理设施中的革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌的影响。 材料和方法对以下消毒剂的效果进行了评估:烷基二甲基苄基氯化铵 (ADBAC)、叔胺 (TA)、聚六亚甲基氯化胍 (PHMG)、过氧化氢 (HP)、氯胺 (CA)、二氯异氰尿酸钠盐(Na DCC)、次氯酸钠(HC)、乙醇(EA)、戊二醛(GA))对铜绿假单胞菌 ATCC 15442 和金黄色葡萄球菌 ATCC 6538-P BFs 的作用。BF 在 96 孔板中于 37ºC 下生长 24 小时,然后暴露于杀菌剂溶液中。通过剩余存活细胞数和 BF 相对密度来评估消毒剂的功效。 结果接触浓度为 6% 的 HP 溶液、0.1% 的 Na DCC 溶液(以活性氯计)、1% 的 HC 溶液(以活性氯计)、1% 的 CA 溶液(以产品计)、0.05% 的 PHMG 溶液和 1.0% 的 TA 溶液时,BF 中的存活细菌细胞数减少了 4 lg 以上。BF 密度降低了 70% 以上。浓度为 0.1-1.0% 的 ADBAC 溶液、浓度为 0.05% 的 TA 溶液、浓度为 3% 的 HP 溶液、浓度为 0.05% 的 Na DCC 溶液(以活性氯计)可使 BF 中的存活细胞数减少 2-lg。当加入 0.5% 的磺醇时,氯活性化合物和 HP 的功效会增加。GA(0.25-1.00%)和 EA(40-70%)溶液对 BF 微生物无效。 结论氧化剂(氯活性剂和含氧剂)、TA 和 PHMG 类消毒剂在抗微生物生物膜方面具有广阔的潜力;将 ADBAC 作为单独的化合物使用效果不佳;醛类和醇类无法破坏 BF 并消灭其中的微生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信